种植园生活:印度尼西亚油棕区的企业占领。塔尼亚-默里-李(Tania MurrayLi)、普乔-塞梅迪(PujoSemedi)著,杜伦和伦敦:杜克大学出版社。第 256 页。26.95 美元(PB);102.95 美元(HB)。ISBN: 9781478014959, 9781478013990

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Joseph Alejandro Martinez Salinas
{"title":"种植园生活:印度尼西亚油棕区的企业占领。塔尼亚-默里-李(Tania MurrayLi)、普乔-塞梅迪(PujoSemedi)著,杜伦和伦敦:杜克大学出版社。第 256 页。26.95 美元(PB);102.95 美元(HB)。ISBN: 9781478014959, 9781478013990","authors":"Joseph Alejandro Martinez Salinas","doi":"10.1111/joac.12575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This timely book by Tania Li and Pujo Semedi offers a grounded account of how the operation of plantations transforms space. <i>Plantation Life</i> focuses on the transformations enacted by corporations owning and running those plantations and the ‘social, economic, and political relations that plantation corporations set in place […] and […] the forms of life they generate’ (p. 3). The authors present the life of workers and communities in the <i>Natco</i> and <i>Priva</i> oil palm plantations, the former state-owned and the latter privately owned. This detailed approach to ‘plantation life’ conceptualizes the presence of corporations in the form of occupation and shows how such occupation creates certain forms of abandonment. The authors deploy a rich ethnographic and historical approach to place these plantations at the crossroads of different unique conjunctures, spatial, social, legal and political, which enable ‘corporate profits’ and produce certain ‘forms of life’. This book's content is based on more than 5 years of field research in Tanjung, in Indonesian Borneo, incorporating a decolonial, collaborative and situated approach.</p><p>From 2010 to 2015, the authors along with a team of 60 undergraduate and graduate students conducted interviews, surveys and participant observation. This fine-grained ethnography contributes to a burgeoning scholarly conversation about plantations and the ‘plantationocene’ (Davis et al., <span>2019</span>; Haraway, <span>2015</span>; Haraway &amp; Anna, <span>2019</span>; Tsing, <span>2015</span>; Wolford, <span>2021</span>). This time, Li and Semejo turn their attention to the interfaces between corporations and state power that enable plantations to be profitable endeavours. Their account shows how the operation of modern plantations implies wider transformations in the life of villagers and workers in the plantation zone through the forms of occupation that it entails. In the enforcement of state mandates to bring ‘development’ to remote areas, companies decide which forms of life they nurture and which ones they abandon. In this capacity, plantations limit access of community members to land and water and create new forms of citizenship, in conditions outside the control of local communities. In this corporate-shaped landscape, communities have adapted their livelihoods to resist and, in a way, also benefit from the plantation corporations by receiving bribes or even stealing. The authors present their argument in seven chapters, including the introduction and conclusion.</p><p>In the introduction, Li and Semedi lay out the theoretical concepts informing the book ‘corporate occupation’, ‘imperial debris’ and ‘extractive regimes’. In Indonesia, plantation corporations fulfil the double mandate of serving the public good and creating profits in a way that delegates state power to those corporations. This mandate defines the ‘occupation’ that enables plantation corporations to organize life bio-politically. This organization of life is based on the racial categories and assessments that shape the colonial government and land law in Indonesia, in particular, the myth of the ‘lazy native’ that has organized land use since the 18th century. Histories of coffee, tea and rubber colonial Dutch plantations in Indonesia are the blueprint of the relations between the Indonesian government and palm oil plantations today as well as the regimes through which plantations extract value. Such ‘extractive regimes’ shape contemporary plantations in Indonesia in the form of ‘illicit extraction’ and an ‘order of impunity’ (p. 14). State incentives for plantations that come from the colonial period have developed into a regime of ‘corporate welfare’ (Hall, <span>2012</span>), paired with strong repression from the government in the 1960s that eliminated unions and workers' organizations. In this context, a rent-seeking ‘mafia system’ has developed as a tool to capture some of the profits produced by the plantation, privatize public resources and secure access to land for plantations. This system takes advantage of ‘choke points in bureaucratic structures’ (p. 17) and operates through state institutions. The subsequent five chapters delineate how corporate plantations enact changes in workers' and villagers' livelihoods and the landscape.</p><p>Chapter 1, ‘Establishing plantations’, pays attention to the creation of plantations <i>Natco</i> and <i>Priva</i> and to the process through which land was acquired. <i>Natco</i> was established in the 1980s in the location of a former rubber plantation that did not occupy the totality of the land that was allocated to operate. When the concession was granted to <i>Natco</i>, the company decided to utilize the totality of the land, replacing trees and crops that were planted by local Dayak communities in the previously unoccupied areas. The authors refer to the histories of local elders who remember how <i>Natco</i> did not respect existing land uses and rights that originated during the time of Dutch colonialism, forcing oil palm plantations in the region and replacing existing fruit and rubber trees without paying compensation to villagers. This occupation was legitimized by a deployment of the colonial imaginary of unproductive and irrational local communities, even when it was met with resistance. In the case of <i>Priva</i>, the plantation was established on a concession bought by the company owner. The land was occupied in collaboration with the national authorities and the Ministry of Transmigration of Indonesia, which brought migrants from other regions in the country. Local community leaders were involved in the process of persuading and forcing villagers to lease land for the plantation, so the concession was able to expand. The procedures of obtaining land leases created opportunities for community leaders, government officials and plantation administrators to alter concession maps, capture rents and access land. As suggested by the authors, the ‘corporations were an occupying force’ (p. 57), which, by taking over the land of farmers and their rice and rubber fields, also negatively impacted their livelihoods and landscapes. These impacts create forms of degraded citizenship that nominally recognize Dayak and Malay workers and villagers as bearers of rights but deny the effective realization of those rights in the face of expanding oil palm plantations.</p><p>Chapter 2, ‘Holding Workers’, discusses the strategies used by <i>Natco</i> and <i>Priva</i> to secure labour. As labour is not bonded, the decision of workers to work for these plantations depends on their perceptions of the working and power conditions in which they negotiate access to work. Here, the experience of seven workers serves as evidence for the authors. This chapter highlights the contradiction between a discourse that poses plantation corporations as providers of stable jobs in remote areas and the reality of plantations relying on casual workers who endure exploitative working conditions, especially when there is a labour reserve to draw from. The existence of this ‘labour reserve army’ is an effective compelling force to secure labour in both plantations. This chapter traces how this force collates down to the calculations and risk assessments that workers make to decide whether or not they continue working for these corporations. Workers include in their assessments their feelings of ‘security, loyalty, precarity and fury’ (p. 89), making of affect a central element in the organization of labour-capital relations in plantations. ‘Familism’, as the logic organizing relations between workers and managers, allows for the operation of a ‘mafia system’ that serves to distribute resources across different actors. This system creates a symbiotic relationship with the corporation, which in some cases is considered unfair by workers. These ‘mafia practices’ constitute a form of life generated by corporate plantations that in some cases has been the object of resistance by workers in Tanjung. Such mafia practices included the hiring of migrant workers to reduce labour costs for the plantation but also the hiring of these migrant workers by older plantation workers to hold production bonuses. In some cases, new workers are hired based on their kin relations and not their skills to carry out plantation tasks. These practices also extend to plantation managers who tamper with the harvest size and even add fictitious employees to the payroll in order to obtain a cut from the payments of plantation workers.</p><p>Chapter 3, ‘Fragile Plots’, focuses on the conditions of contracted palm oil production. The subjects in this chapter are landed farmers, ‘oil palm out-growers’ who live under occupation by the plantation corporations. This occupation is ‘territorial’ and ‘dispersed in multiple practices, sites and institutions that enable […] the corporation to extract value from their labour while avoiding responsibility for their fate’ (p. 93). This chapter focuses exclusively on the case of <i>Priva</i>, which has the upper hand in its relation with the farmers on which it depends. This dependency has been produced by debt and infrastructure inside the plantations. Debt, cooperatives and roads make producers effectively reliant on the corporation running <i>Priva</i>. Transmigrants who came to the region looking for a bright future as independent farmers found themselves exploited through tool booths that allocated control over the flow of income to plantation managers and village leaders. From price manipulation and inflated debt figures to unfair deductions from producers' incomes made in cooperatives, the out-growers scheme is defined by exploitation. In this chapter, Li and Semejo present this exploitation in stark contrast with the thriving lives of independent farmers dedicated to rice and rubber production in Tanjung, while out-growers are unable to cover their needs with income from their 2-ha oil palm plots.</p><p>Chapter 4, ‘Forms of Life’, pays attention to the legal and institutional arrangements that sustain the occupation of these corporate plantations. In plantation zones, law is applied selectively, in a way that has both protected corporations and made them vulnerable to extortion. It has also created forms of citizenship that entitle producers to rights that are not enforceable. Plantations secure support and protection from the government through the mandate of government officials to support the operation of these plantations as well as by funding campaigns of village and district authorities. In the case of <i>Priva</i>, the company bribes journalists, government officers and village leaders to gather community support and avoid negative reports in the press and government agencies. In <i>Natco</i>, disputes with workers and theft cases were resolved internally without resorting to the police, in line with the ‘familism’ that organizes relations inside the plantation: ‘Families demand loyalty, and everyone is expected to help guard the family's reputation’ (p. 130), the authors recall. This familism that organizes labour-capital relations is accompanied by the project of creating an ‘exemplary site of modernity’ (p. 131) through the plantation. This project implied the deployment of of gender, ethnic and racial hierarchies between plantation managers and workers and between plantation staff and neighbouring Malay and Dayak communities.</p><p>Chapter 5, ‘Corporate Presence’, looks at the existing critiques of the corporate regime organizing plantation production in Indonesia. Li and Semejo center on three aspects of these critiques that have contributed to the expansion of plantations, instead of effectively questioning this regime. The first aspect is the limited scope of critiques at the transnational, policy, provincial, and district levels. Those fall short of recognizing the forms of exploitation and occupation that sustain palm oil plantations across the country. Technical fixes aimed to ensure production is sustainable, transparent, respectful of human rights, and compliant with the law take the plantation occupation and their corporate mandates for granted. The second aspect is the reformist character of sustainability initiatives that aim to make ‘bad oil’ good, repeating ‘the narrative that oil palm is intrinsically good’ (p. 167). Initiatives such as the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil and the policy of No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation operate on the assumption that implementation of certain standards can ensure that oil palm plantations operate in ‘harmony’ with local communities and the environment (p. 176). The third aspect identified by the authors refers to the lack of criticism of the apparent efficiency of corporate plantations for growing oil palm and their appropriateness in contributing to employment generation and local development. Professional management is deemed more appropriate, even when smallholder production is more efficient per unit of land, creates more diverse and secure livelihoods for communities and is more resilient in the face of market changes. This discourse is matched with a series of policies that privilege corporate plantation production with favourable regulation, tax breaks, protest quelling and financial bailouts.</p><p>In the conclusion, Li and Semejo present their conceptualization of ‘corporate occupation’ as a political technology (p. 185) that aligns different subjects and practices to secure the production for profit in plantations. This deployment allows the authors to enrich the political economy approach presented in this book, with an analysis of the imperial debris: the state's mandates and actors that form the occupation regime. The double-edged sword of coercion and impunity marks this regime, as well as the ‘degradation of citizenship’ of workers and villagers alike. These elements, central to the plantation occupation regime, have also proved to be deleterious for corporations by exposing them to bribery and theft inside the ‘mafia system’.</p><p>Overall, this is an engaging and insightful piece that provokes the reader to think of corporations as an occupying force that shapes and is shaped by forms of state power. Plantations here are conceptualized in the intersection between the state and corporations, organizing life beyond the moment of production. Li and Semejo contribute here to current conversations in social reproduction theory that pay attention to the production and reproduction of life under capitalism, even if this is not directly referenced in the book (see, e.g., Bhattacharya, <span>2017</span>; Katz, <span>2001</span>; Mezzadri, <span>2019</span>). As shown in <i>Plantation Life</i>, These processes are neither incidental nor peripherical for capitalist production. Instead, forms of life created through the occupation regime are instrumental to capital accumulation. Contributing to a better understanding of the articulation between these different forms of life, this book points to the role that state power and its institutions play in capitalism.</p><p>While the book does not refer explicitly to the relationship between state and capital, this question lies at the core of the argument presented. State institutions and regulations are organized simultaneously by modern and colonial ideologies in a configuration that puts them at the service of profit production and distribution. Policies implemented by states can be thought of as mediations of global dynamics of value production and accumulation under capitalism (Charnock &amp; Starosta, <span>2018</span>). Shaped by the specific historical conditions and spaces where these practices take place, state policies and institutions contribute in various ways to accumulation. <i>Plantation Life</i> points at those state-capital relations and offers insights into how these relations impact the livelihoods and the landscape inhabited by villagers and workers in oil palm plantation zones, both as domination force and object of resistance.</p><p>Collaborative analysis and writing constitute an additional interesting element of the book. Li and Semejo have included an appendix presenting the challenges of writing collaboratively and considering the racial, linguistic, and colonial relations of power that define the process. Both authors approach their research from different standpoints and intellectual traditions (the book's preface starts with a conversation between Li and Semejo on what the plantation is and explains how the two authors arrive at different definitions based on their personal trajectories). However, in a rare and significant effort, the authors dedicate a section of the book to show how they account for those differences in the moment of writing, considering the implications of writing this piece in English, the colonial language of global academia.</p><p>This book is a significant contribution to understanding labour-capital relations in modern plantations and constitutes a valuable reading for those working in oil palm production and Indonesia. This detailed and deep exploration of life under plantation occupation will serve as a reference for others who can subsequently replicate this effort to study other plantations. As Li and Semejo observe, this book invites comparison to help us understand why these forms of life appear and refine our theoretical understanding of corporations, state power, and accumulation in the time of the ‘global plantation’ and the ‘plantationocene’.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12575","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plantation life: Corporate occupation in Indonesia's oil palm zone. By Tania Murray Li, Pujo Semedi, Durham and London: Duke University Press. 2021. pp. 256. $26.95 (pb); $102.95 (hb). ISBN: 9781478014959, 9781478013990\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Alejandro Martinez Salinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joac.12575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This timely book by Tania Li and Pujo Semedi offers a grounded account of how the operation of plantations transforms space. <i>Plantation Life</i> focuses on the transformations enacted by corporations owning and running those plantations and the ‘social, economic, and political relations that plantation corporations set in place […] and […] the forms of life they generate’ (p. 3). The authors present the life of workers and communities in the <i>Natco</i> and <i>Priva</i> oil palm plantations, the former state-owned and the latter privately owned. This detailed approach to ‘plantation life’ conceptualizes the presence of corporations in the form of occupation and shows how such occupation creates certain forms of abandonment. The authors deploy a rich ethnographic and historical approach to place these plantations at the crossroads of different unique conjunctures, spatial, social, legal and political, which enable ‘corporate profits’ and produce certain ‘forms of life’. This book's content is based on more than 5 years of field research in Tanjung, in Indonesian Borneo, incorporating a decolonial, collaborative and situated approach.</p><p>From 2010 to 2015, the authors along with a team of 60 undergraduate and graduate students conducted interviews, surveys and participant observation. This fine-grained ethnography contributes to a burgeoning scholarly conversation about plantations and the ‘plantationocene’ (Davis et al., <span>2019</span>; Haraway, <span>2015</span>; Haraway &amp; Anna, <span>2019</span>; Tsing, <span>2015</span>; Wolford, <span>2021</span>). This time, Li and Semejo turn their attention to the interfaces between corporations and state power that enable plantations to be profitable endeavours. Their account shows how the operation of modern plantations implies wider transformations in the life of villagers and workers in the plantation zone through the forms of occupation that it entails. In the enforcement of state mandates to bring ‘development’ to remote areas, companies decide which forms of life they nurture and which ones they abandon. In this capacity, plantations limit access of community members to land and water and create new forms of citizenship, in conditions outside the control of local communities. In this corporate-shaped landscape, communities have adapted their livelihoods to resist and, in a way, also benefit from the plantation corporations by receiving bribes or even stealing. The authors present their argument in seven chapters, including the introduction and conclusion.</p><p>In the introduction, Li and Semedi lay out the theoretical concepts informing the book ‘corporate occupation’, ‘imperial debris’ and ‘extractive regimes’. In Indonesia, plantation corporations fulfil the double mandate of serving the public good and creating profits in a way that delegates state power to those corporations. This mandate defines the ‘occupation’ that enables plantation corporations to organize life bio-politically. This organization of life is based on the racial categories and assessments that shape the colonial government and land law in Indonesia, in particular, the myth of the ‘lazy native’ that has organized land use since the 18th century. Histories of coffee, tea and rubber colonial Dutch plantations in Indonesia are the blueprint of the relations between the Indonesian government and palm oil plantations today as well as the regimes through which plantations extract value. Such ‘extractive regimes’ shape contemporary plantations in Indonesia in the form of ‘illicit extraction’ and an ‘order of impunity’ (p. 14). State incentives for plantations that come from the colonial period have developed into a regime of ‘corporate welfare’ (Hall, <span>2012</span>), paired with strong repression from the government in the 1960s that eliminated unions and workers' organizations. In this context, a rent-seeking ‘mafia system’ has developed as a tool to capture some of the profits produced by the plantation, privatize public resources and secure access to land for plantations. This system takes advantage of ‘choke points in bureaucratic structures’ (p. 17) and operates through state institutions. The subsequent five chapters delineate how corporate plantations enact changes in workers' and villagers' livelihoods and the landscape.</p><p>Chapter 1, ‘Establishing plantations’, pays attention to the creation of plantations <i>Natco</i> and <i>Priva</i> and to the process through which land was acquired. <i>Natco</i> was established in the 1980s in the location of a former rubber plantation that did not occupy the totality of the land that was allocated to operate. When the concession was granted to <i>Natco</i>, the company decided to utilize the totality of the land, replacing trees and crops that were planted by local Dayak communities in the previously unoccupied areas. The authors refer to the histories of local elders who remember how <i>Natco</i> did not respect existing land uses and rights that originated during the time of Dutch colonialism, forcing oil palm plantations in the region and replacing existing fruit and rubber trees without paying compensation to villagers. This occupation was legitimized by a deployment of the colonial imaginary of unproductive and irrational local communities, even when it was met with resistance. In the case of <i>Priva</i>, the plantation was established on a concession bought by the company owner. The land was occupied in collaboration with the national authorities and the Ministry of Transmigration of Indonesia, which brought migrants from other regions in the country. Local community leaders were involved in the process of persuading and forcing villagers to lease land for the plantation, so the concession was able to expand. The procedures of obtaining land leases created opportunities for community leaders, government officials and plantation administrators to alter concession maps, capture rents and access land. As suggested by the authors, the ‘corporations were an occupying force’ (p. 57), which, by taking over the land of farmers and their rice and rubber fields, also negatively impacted their livelihoods and landscapes. These impacts create forms of degraded citizenship that nominally recognize Dayak and Malay workers and villagers as bearers of rights but deny the effective realization of those rights in the face of expanding oil palm plantations.</p><p>Chapter 2, ‘Holding Workers’, discusses the strategies used by <i>Natco</i> and <i>Priva</i> to secure labour. As labour is not bonded, the decision of workers to work for these plantations depends on their perceptions of the working and power conditions in which they negotiate access to work. Here, the experience of seven workers serves as evidence for the authors. This chapter highlights the contradiction between a discourse that poses plantation corporations as providers of stable jobs in remote areas and the reality of plantations relying on casual workers who endure exploitative working conditions, especially when there is a labour reserve to draw from. The existence of this ‘labour reserve army’ is an effective compelling force to secure labour in both plantations. This chapter traces how this force collates down to the calculations and risk assessments that workers make to decide whether or not they continue working for these corporations. Workers include in their assessments their feelings of ‘security, loyalty, precarity and fury’ (p. 89), making of affect a central element in the organization of labour-capital relations in plantations. ‘Familism’, as the logic organizing relations between workers and managers, allows for the operation of a ‘mafia system’ that serves to distribute resources across different actors. This system creates a symbiotic relationship with the corporation, which in some cases is considered unfair by workers. These ‘mafia practices’ constitute a form of life generated by corporate plantations that in some cases has been the object of resistance by workers in Tanjung. Such mafia practices included the hiring of migrant workers to reduce labour costs for the plantation but also the hiring of these migrant workers by older plantation workers to hold production bonuses. In some cases, new workers are hired based on their kin relations and not their skills to carry out plantation tasks. These practices also extend to plantation managers who tamper with the harvest size and even add fictitious employees to the payroll in order to obtain a cut from the payments of plantation workers.</p><p>Chapter 3, ‘Fragile Plots’, focuses on the conditions of contracted palm oil production. The subjects in this chapter are landed farmers, ‘oil palm out-growers’ who live under occupation by the plantation corporations. This occupation is ‘territorial’ and ‘dispersed in multiple practices, sites and institutions that enable […] the corporation to extract value from their labour while avoiding responsibility for their fate’ (p. 93). This chapter focuses exclusively on the case of <i>Priva</i>, which has the upper hand in its relation with the farmers on which it depends. This dependency has been produced by debt and infrastructure inside the plantations. Debt, cooperatives and roads make producers effectively reliant on the corporation running <i>Priva</i>. Transmigrants who came to the region looking for a bright future as independent farmers found themselves exploited through tool booths that allocated control over the flow of income to plantation managers and village leaders. From price manipulation and inflated debt figures to unfair deductions from producers' incomes made in cooperatives, the out-growers scheme is defined by exploitation. In this chapter, Li and Semejo present this exploitation in stark contrast with the thriving lives of independent farmers dedicated to rice and rubber production in Tanjung, while out-growers are unable to cover their needs with income from their 2-ha oil palm plots.</p><p>Chapter 4, ‘Forms of Life’, pays attention to the legal and institutional arrangements that sustain the occupation of these corporate plantations. In plantation zones, law is applied selectively, in a way that has both protected corporations and made them vulnerable to extortion. It has also created forms of citizenship that entitle producers to rights that are not enforceable. Plantations secure support and protection from the government through the mandate of government officials to support the operation of these plantations as well as by funding campaigns of village and district authorities. In the case of <i>Priva</i>, the company bribes journalists, government officers and village leaders to gather community support and avoid negative reports in the press and government agencies. In <i>Natco</i>, disputes with workers and theft cases were resolved internally without resorting to the police, in line with the ‘familism’ that organizes relations inside the plantation: ‘Families demand loyalty, and everyone is expected to help guard the family's reputation’ (p. 130), the authors recall. This familism that organizes labour-capital relations is accompanied by the project of creating an ‘exemplary site of modernity’ (p. 131) through the plantation. This project implied the deployment of of gender, ethnic and racial hierarchies between plantation managers and workers and between plantation staff and neighbouring Malay and Dayak communities.</p><p>Chapter 5, ‘Corporate Presence’, looks at the existing critiques of the corporate regime organizing plantation production in Indonesia. Li and Semejo center on three aspects of these critiques that have contributed to the expansion of plantations, instead of effectively questioning this regime. The first aspect is the limited scope of critiques at the transnational, policy, provincial, and district levels. Those fall short of recognizing the forms of exploitation and occupation that sustain palm oil plantations across the country. Technical fixes aimed to ensure production is sustainable, transparent, respectful of human rights, and compliant with the law take the plantation occupation and their corporate mandates for granted. The second aspect is the reformist character of sustainability initiatives that aim to make ‘bad oil’ good, repeating ‘the narrative that oil palm is intrinsically good’ (p. 167). Initiatives such as the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil and the policy of No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation operate on the assumption that implementation of certain standards can ensure that oil palm plantations operate in ‘harmony’ with local communities and the environment (p. 176). The third aspect identified by the authors refers to the lack of criticism of the apparent efficiency of corporate plantations for growing oil palm and their appropriateness in contributing to employment generation and local development. Professional management is deemed more appropriate, even when smallholder production is more efficient per unit of land, creates more diverse and secure livelihoods for communities and is more resilient in the face of market changes. This discourse is matched with a series of policies that privilege corporate plantation production with favourable regulation, tax breaks, protest quelling and financial bailouts.</p><p>In the conclusion, Li and Semejo present their conceptualization of ‘corporate occupation’ as a political technology (p. 185) that aligns different subjects and practices to secure the production for profit in plantations. This deployment allows the authors to enrich the political economy approach presented in this book, with an analysis of the imperial debris: the state's mandates and actors that form the occupation regime. The double-edged sword of coercion and impunity marks this regime, as well as the ‘degradation of citizenship’ of workers and villagers alike. These elements, central to the plantation occupation regime, have also proved to be deleterious for corporations by exposing them to bribery and theft inside the ‘mafia system’.</p><p>Overall, this is an engaging and insightful piece that provokes the reader to think of corporations as an occupying force that shapes and is shaped by forms of state power. Plantations here are conceptualized in the intersection between the state and corporations, organizing life beyond the moment of production. Li and Semejo contribute here to current conversations in social reproduction theory that pay attention to the production and reproduction of life under capitalism, even if this is not directly referenced in the book (see, e.g., Bhattacharya, <span>2017</span>; Katz, <span>2001</span>; Mezzadri, <span>2019</span>). As shown in <i>Plantation Life</i>, These processes are neither incidental nor peripherical for capitalist production. Instead, forms of life created through the occupation regime are instrumental to capital accumulation. Contributing to a better understanding of the articulation between these different forms of life, this book points to the role that state power and its institutions play in capitalism.</p><p>While the book does not refer explicitly to the relationship between state and capital, this question lies at the core of the argument presented. State institutions and regulations are organized simultaneously by modern and colonial ideologies in a configuration that puts them at the service of profit production and distribution. Policies implemented by states can be thought of as mediations of global dynamics of value production and accumulation under capitalism (Charnock &amp; Starosta, <span>2018</span>). Shaped by the specific historical conditions and spaces where these practices take place, state policies and institutions contribute in various ways to accumulation. <i>Plantation Life</i> points at those state-capital relations and offers insights into how these relations impact the livelihoods and the landscape inhabited by villagers and workers in oil palm plantation zones, both as domination force and object of resistance.</p><p>Collaborative analysis and writing constitute an additional interesting element of the book. Li and Semejo have included an appendix presenting the challenges of writing collaboratively and considering the racial, linguistic, and colonial relations of power that define the process. Both authors approach their research from different standpoints and intellectual traditions (the book's preface starts with a conversation between Li and Semejo on what the plantation is and explains how the two authors arrive at different definitions based on their personal trajectories). However, in a rare and significant effort, the authors dedicate a section of the book to show how they account for those differences in the moment of writing, considering the implications of writing this piece in English, the colonial language of global academia.</p><p>This book is a significant contribution to understanding labour-capital relations in modern plantations and constitutes a valuable reading for those working in oil palm production and Indonesia. This detailed and deep exploration of life under plantation occupation will serve as a reference for others who can subsequently replicate this effort to study other plantations. As Li and Semejo observe, this book invites comparison to help us understand why these forms of life appear and refine our theoretical understanding of corporations, state power, and accumulation in the time of the ‘global plantation’ and the ‘plantationocene’.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agrarian Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12575\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agrarian Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.12575\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.12575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塔尼亚-李(Tania Li)和普乔-塞梅迪(Pujo Semedi)撰写的这本及时的著作对种植园的运作如何改变空间进行了深入的阐述。种植园生活》重点关注拥有和经营这些种植园的公司所进行的变革,以及 "种植园公司所建立的社会、经济和政治关系[......]和[......]它们所产生的生活形式"(第 3 页)。作者介绍了 Natco 和 Priva(前者为国有,后者为私有)油棕种植园工人和社区的生活。这种详细介绍 "种植园生活 "的方法将企业的存在以占领的形式概念化,并展示了这种占领如何造成某种形式的遗弃。作者运用丰富的人种学和历史学方法,将这些种植园置于空间、社会、法律和政治等不同的独特结合点的十字路口,这些结合点促成了 "企业利润 "并产生了某些 "生活形式"。本书的内容基于在印尼婆罗洲丹绒进行的5年多实地研究,采用了非殖民、合作和情境方法。从2010年到2015年,作者与一个由60名本科生和研究生组成的团队进行了访谈、调查和参与观察。这一精细的人种学研究为有关种植园和 "种植园世 "的蓬勃发展的学术对话做出了贡献(戴维斯等人,2019;哈拉维,2015;哈拉维&amp;安娜,2019;青,2015;沃尔福德,2021)。这一次,Li 和 Semejo 将目光转向了企业与国家权力之间的关系,正是这种关系使得种植园成为有利可图的事业。他们的论述表明,现代种植园的运作如何通过其所带来的职业形式,对种植园区村民和工人的生活产生更广泛的影响。公司在执行国家为偏远地区带来 "发展 "的任务时,决定了哪些生活形式需要培育,哪些需要放弃。因此,种植园限制了社区成员对土地和水的使用,并在当地社区无法控制的条件下创造了新的公民形式。在这种企业化的环境中,社区调整了自己的生计,以抵制种植园企业,并在某种程度上通过收受贿赂甚至偷窃从种植园企业获益。在引言中,李和塞梅迪阐述了本书的理论概念 "企业占领"、"帝国碎片 "和 "采掘制度"。在印尼,种植园企业履行着服务公共利益和创造利润的双重使命,并将国家权力授予这些企业。这种使命界定了 "占领",使种植园公司能够以生物政治的方式组织生活。这种对生活的组织基于形成印度尼西亚殖民政府和土地法的种族分类和评估,特别是自 18 世纪以来组织土地使用的 "懒惰的本地人 "神话。荷兰殖民时期在印尼的咖啡、茶叶和橡胶种植园的历史是今天印尼政府与棕榈油种植园之间关系的蓝图,也是种植园榨取价值的制度。这种 "采掘制度 "以 "非法采掘 "和 "有罪不罚的秩序"(第 14 页)的形式塑造了印尼当代的种植园。殖民时期国家对种植园的鼓励措施已发展成为一种 "企业福利 "制度(Hall,2012 年),再加上 20 世纪 60 年代政府对工会和工人组织的强力镇压。在这种情况下,一种寻租的 "黑手党制度 "发展起来,成为攫取种植园生产的部分利润、将公共资源私有化并确保种植园获得土地的工具。这一体系利用 "官僚结构中的咽喉"(第 17 页),通过国家机构运作。第一章 "建立种植园 "关注 Natco 和 Priva 种植园的建立以及土地的获取过程。Natco 种植园成立于 20 世纪 80 年代,原址是一个橡胶种植园,但该橡胶种植园并未占用划拨给其经营的全部土地。当特许权授予 Natco 公司时,该公司决定利用全部土地,取代当地达雅克社区在以前未被占用的地区种植的树木和作物。 在本章中,李和塞米乔将这种剥削与丹戎地区致力于水稻和橡胶生产的独立农民欣欣向荣的生活形成鲜明对比,而外来种植者却无法用 2 公顷油棕地的收入来满足自己的需求。第 4 章 "生活形式 "关注维持这些公司种植园的法律和制度安排。在种植园区,法律被有选择性地适用,这种方式既保护了公司,也使他们容易受到勒索。它还创造了公民权的形式,使生产者有权享有无法强制执行的权利。种植园通过授权政府官员支持这些种植园的运营,以及资助村庄和地区当局的活动,获得政府的支持和保护。以 Priva 公司为例,该公司贿赂记者、政府官员和村领导,以争取社区支持,避免媒体和政府机构的负面报道。在 Natco 公司,与工人的纠纷和盗窃案件都在内部解决,无需求助于警方,这与种植园内部的 "家庭主义 "关系是一致的:"家庭要求忠诚,每个人都要帮助维护家庭的声誉"(第 130 页)。这种组织劳动与资本关系的家庭主义伴随着通过种植园创建 "现代性典范"(第 131 页)的项目。这一项目意味着在种植园管理者和工人之间,以及种植园员工和邻近的马来人和达雅克人社区之间部署性别、民族和种族等级制度。第 5 章 "企业存在 "探讨了对组织印尼种植园生产的企业制度的现有批评。Li 和 Semejo 着重探讨了这些批判的三个方面,这些批判助长了种植园的扩张,而不是有效地质疑这一制度。第一个方面是跨国、政策、省和地区层面的批评范围有限。这些批评没有认识到支撑全国棕榈油种植园的剥削和占领形式。旨在确保生产可持续、透明、尊重人权和遵守法律的技术性修复措施将种植园的占领及其企业任务视为理所当然。第二个方面是可持续发展倡议的改良主义特征,其目的是让 "坏油 "变好,重复 "油棕榈树本质上是好的"(第 167 页)。可持续棕榈油圆桌会议 "和 "无砍伐、无泥炭、无开采 "政策等倡议所依据的假设是,执行某些标准可以确保油棕种植园与当地社区和环境 "和谐 "相处(第 176 页)。作者指出的第三个方面是,对企业种植园种植油棕的明显效率及其在创造就业机会和促进当地发展方面的适当性缺乏批评。专业化管理被认为更合适,即使小农生产在单位土地上更有效率,为社区创造更多样化和更安全的生计,在面对市场变化时更有弹性。在结论中,Li 和 Semejo 将 "企业占领 "概念化为一种政治技术(第 185 页),将不同的主体和实践结合起来,以确保种植园的利润生产。这一部署使作者得以丰富本书中的政治经济学方法,对帝国碎片进行分析:构成占领制度的国家授权和行动者。胁迫和有罪不罚这把双刃剑是这一制度的标志,也是工人和村民 "公民权退化 "的标志。总之,这是一篇引人入胜、见解深刻的文章,引发读者将企业视为一种占领力量,它塑造了国家权力的形式,同时也被国家权力的形式所塑造。在这里,种植园被概念化为国家与企业之间的交叉点,在生产的瞬间之外组织生活。李和塞米乔在此为当前社会再生产理论的对话做出了贡献,这些对话关注资本主义下生活的生产和再生产,即使书中没有直接提到这一点(参见,例如,Bhattacharya, 2017; Katz, 2001; Mezzadri, 2019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plantation life: Corporate occupation in Indonesia's oil palm zone. By Tania Murray Li, Pujo Semedi, Durham and London: Duke University Press. 2021. pp. 256. $26.95 (pb); $102.95 (hb). ISBN: 9781478014959, 9781478013990

This timely book by Tania Li and Pujo Semedi offers a grounded account of how the operation of plantations transforms space. Plantation Life focuses on the transformations enacted by corporations owning and running those plantations and the ‘social, economic, and political relations that plantation corporations set in place […] and […] the forms of life they generate’ (p. 3). The authors present the life of workers and communities in the Natco and Priva oil palm plantations, the former state-owned and the latter privately owned. This detailed approach to ‘plantation life’ conceptualizes the presence of corporations in the form of occupation and shows how such occupation creates certain forms of abandonment. The authors deploy a rich ethnographic and historical approach to place these plantations at the crossroads of different unique conjunctures, spatial, social, legal and political, which enable ‘corporate profits’ and produce certain ‘forms of life’. This book's content is based on more than 5 years of field research in Tanjung, in Indonesian Borneo, incorporating a decolonial, collaborative and situated approach.

From 2010 to 2015, the authors along with a team of 60 undergraduate and graduate students conducted interviews, surveys and participant observation. This fine-grained ethnography contributes to a burgeoning scholarly conversation about plantations and the ‘plantationocene’ (Davis et al., 2019; Haraway, 2015; Haraway & Anna, 2019; Tsing, 2015; Wolford, 2021). This time, Li and Semejo turn their attention to the interfaces between corporations and state power that enable plantations to be profitable endeavours. Their account shows how the operation of modern plantations implies wider transformations in the life of villagers and workers in the plantation zone through the forms of occupation that it entails. In the enforcement of state mandates to bring ‘development’ to remote areas, companies decide which forms of life they nurture and which ones they abandon. In this capacity, plantations limit access of community members to land and water and create new forms of citizenship, in conditions outside the control of local communities. In this corporate-shaped landscape, communities have adapted their livelihoods to resist and, in a way, also benefit from the plantation corporations by receiving bribes or even stealing. The authors present their argument in seven chapters, including the introduction and conclusion.

In the introduction, Li and Semedi lay out the theoretical concepts informing the book ‘corporate occupation’, ‘imperial debris’ and ‘extractive regimes’. In Indonesia, plantation corporations fulfil the double mandate of serving the public good and creating profits in a way that delegates state power to those corporations. This mandate defines the ‘occupation’ that enables plantation corporations to organize life bio-politically. This organization of life is based on the racial categories and assessments that shape the colonial government and land law in Indonesia, in particular, the myth of the ‘lazy native’ that has organized land use since the 18th century. Histories of coffee, tea and rubber colonial Dutch plantations in Indonesia are the blueprint of the relations between the Indonesian government and palm oil plantations today as well as the regimes through which plantations extract value. Such ‘extractive regimes’ shape contemporary plantations in Indonesia in the form of ‘illicit extraction’ and an ‘order of impunity’ (p. 14). State incentives for plantations that come from the colonial period have developed into a regime of ‘corporate welfare’ (Hall, 2012), paired with strong repression from the government in the 1960s that eliminated unions and workers' organizations. In this context, a rent-seeking ‘mafia system’ has developed as a tool to capture some of the profits produced by the plantation, privatize public resources and secure access to land for plantations. This system takes advantage of ‘choke points in bureaucratic structures’ (p. 17) and operates through state institutions. The subsequent five chapters delineate how corporate plantations enact changes in workers' and villagers' livelihoods and the landscape.

Chapter 1, ‘Establishing plantations’, pays attention to the creation of plantations Natco and Priva and to the process through which land was acquired. Natco was established in the 1980s in the location of a former rubber plantation that did not occupy the totality of the land that was allocated to operate. When the concession was granted to Natco, the company decided to utilize the totality of the land, replacing trees and crops that were planted by local Dayak communities in the previously unoccupied areas. The authors refer to the histories of local elders who remember how Natco did not respect existing land uses and rights that originated during the time of Dutch colonialism, forcing oil palm plantations in the region and replacing existing fruit and rubber trees without paying compensation to villagers. This occupation was legitimized by a deployment of the colonial imaginary of unproductive and irrational local communities, even when it was met with resistance. In the case of Priva, the plantation was established on a concession bought by the company owner. The land was occupied in collaboration with the national authorities and the Ministry of Transmigration of Indonesia, which brought migrants from other regions in the country. Local community leaders were involved in the process of persuading and forcing villagers to lease land for the plantation, so the concession was able to expand. The procedures of obtaining land leases created opportunities for community leaders, government officials and plantation administrators to alter concession maps, capture rents and access land. As suggested by the authors, the ‘corporations were an occupying force’ (p. 57), which, by taking over the land of farmers and their rice and rubber fields, also negatively impacted their livelihoods and landscapes. These impacts create forms of degraded citizenship that nominally recognize Dayak and Malay workers and villagers as bearers of rights but deny the effective realization of those rights in the face of expanding oil palm plantations.

Chapter 2, ‘Holding Workers’, discusses the strategies used by Natco and Priva to secure labour. As labour is not bonded, the decision of workers to work for these plantations depends on their perceptions of the working and power conditions in which they negotiate access to work. Here, the experience of seven workers serves as evidence for the authors. This chapter highlights the contradiction between a discourse that poses plantation corporations as providers of stable jobs in remote areas and the reality of plantations relying on casual workers who endure exploitative working conditions, especially when there is a labour reserve to draw from. The existence of this ‘labour reserve army’ is an effective compelling force to secure labour in both plantations. This chapter traces how this force collates down to the calculations and risk assessments that workers make to decide whether or not they continue working for these corporations. Workers include in their assessments their feelings of ‘security, loyalty, precarity and fury’ (p. 89), making of affect a central element in the organization of labour-capital relations in plantations. ‘Familism’, as the logic organizing relations between workers and managers, allows for the operation of a ‘mafia system’ that serves to distribute resources across different actors. This system creates a symbiotic relationship with the corporation, which in some cases is considered unfair by workers. These ‘mafia practices’ constitute a form of life generated by corporate plantations that in some cases has been the object of resistance by workers in Tanjung. Such mafia practices included the hiring of migrant workers to reduce labour costs for the plantation but also the hiring of these migrant workers by older plantation workers to hold production bonuses. In some cases, new workers are hired based on their kin relations and not their skills to carry out plantation tasks. These practices also extend to plantation managers who tamper with the harvest size and even add fictitious employees to the payroll in order to obtain a cut from the payments of plantation workers.

Chapter 3, ‘Fragile Plots’, focuses on the conditions of contracted palm oil production. The subjects in this chapter are landed farmers, ‘oil palm out-growers’ who live under occupation by the plantation corporations. This occupation is ‘territorial’ and ‘dispersed in multiple practices, sites and institutions that enable […] the corporation to extract value from their labour while avoiding responsibility for their fate’ (p. 93). This chapter focuses exclusively on the case of Priva, which has the upper hand in its relation with the farmers on which it depends. This dependency has been produced by debt and infrastructure inside the plantations. Debt, cooperatives and roads make producers effectively reliant on the corporation running Priva. Transmigrants who came to the region looking for a bright future as independent farmers found themselves exploited through tool booths that allocated control over the flow of income to plantation managers and village leaders. From price manipulation and inflated debt figures to unfair deductions from producers' incomes made in cooperatives, the out-growers scheme is defined by exploitation. In this chapter, Li and Semejo present this exploitation in stark contrast with the thriving lives of independent farmers dedicated to rice and rubber production in Tanjung, while out-growers are unable to cover their needs with income from their 2-ha oil palm plots.

Chapter 4, ‘Forms of Life’, pays attention to the legal and institutional arrangements that sustain the occupation of these corporate plantations. In plantation zones, law is applied selectively, in a way that has both protected corporations and made them vulnerable to extortion. It has also created forms of citizenship that entitle producers to rights that are not enforceable. Plantations secure support and protection from the government through the mandate of government officials to support the operation of these plantations as well as by funding campaigns of village and district authorities. In the case of Priva, the company bribes journalists, government officers and village leaders to gather community support and avoid negative reports in the press and government agencies. In Natco, disputes with workers and theft cases were resolved internally without resorting to the police, in line with the ‘familism’ that organizes relations inside the plantation: ‘Families demand loyalty, and everyone is expected to help guard the family's reputation’ (p. 130), the authors recall. This familism that organizes labour-capital relations is accompanied by the project of creating an ‘exemplary site of modernity’ (p. 131) through the plantation. This project implied the deployment of of gender, ethnic and racial hierarchies between plantation managers and workers and between plantation staff and neighbouring Malay and Dayak communities.

Chapter 5, ‘Corporate Presence’, looks at the existing critiques of the corporate regime organizing plantation production in Indonesia. Li and Semejo center on three aspects of these critiques that have contributed to the expansion of plantations, instead of effectively questioning this regime. The first aspect is the limited scope of critiques at the transnational, policy, provincial, and district levels. Those fall short of recognizing the forms of exploitation and occupation that sustain palm oil plantations across the country. Technical fixes aimed to ensure production is sustainable, transparent, respectful of human rights, and compliant with the law take the plantation occupation and their corporate mandates for granted. The second aspect is the reformist character of sustainability initiatives that aim to make ‘bad oil’ good, repeating ‘the narrative that oil palm is intrinsically good’ (p. 167). Initiatives such as the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil and the policy of No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation operate on the assumption that implementation of certain standards can ensure that oil palm plantations operate in ‘harmony’ with local communities and the environment (p. 176). The third aspect identified by the authors refers to the lack of criticism of the apparent efficiency of corporate plantations for growing oil palm and their appropriateness in contributing to employment generation and local development. Professional management is deemed more appropriate, even when smallholder production is more efficient per unit of land, creates more diverse and secure livelihoods for communities and is more resilient in the face of market changes. This discourse is matched with a series of policies that privilege corporate plantation production with favourable regulation, tax breaks, protest quelling and financial bailouts.

In the conclusion, Li and Semejo present their conceptualization of ‘corporate occupation’ as a political technology (p. 185) that aligns different subjects and practices to secure the production for profit in plantations. This deployment allows the authors to enrich the political economy approach presented in this book, with an analysis of the imperial debris: the state's mandates and actors that form the occupation regime. The double-edged sword of coercion and impunity marks this regime, as well as the ‘degradation of citizenship’ of workers and villagers alike. These elements, central to the plantation occupation regime, have also proved to be deleterious for corporations by exposing them to bribery and theft inside the ‘mafia system’.

Overall, this is an engaging and insightful piece that provokes the reader to think of corporations as an occupying force that shapes and is shaped by forms of state power. Plantations here are conceptualized in the intersection between the state and corporations, organizing life beyond the moment of production. Li and Semejo contribute here to current conversations in social reproduction theory that pay attention to the production and reproduction of life under capitalism, even if this is not directly referenced in the book (see, e.g., Bhattacharya, 2017; Katz, 2001; Mezzadri, 2019). As shown in Plantation Life, These processes are neither incidental nor peripherical for capitalist production. Instead, forms of life created through the occupation regime are instrumental to capital accumulation. Contributing to a better understanding of the articulation between these different forms of life, this book points to the role that state power and its institutions play in capitalism.

While the book does not refer explicitly to the relationship between state and capital, this question lies at the core of the argument presented. State institutions and regulations are organized simultaneously by modern and colonial ideologies in a configuration that puts them at the service of profit production and distribution. Policies implemented by states can be thought of as mediations of global dynamics of value production and accumulation under capitalism (Charnock & Starosta, 2018). Shaped by the specific historical conditions and spaces where these practices take place, state policies and institutions contribute in various ways to accumulation. Plantation Life points at those state-capital relations and offers insights into how these relations impact the livelihoods and the landscape inhabited by villagers and workers in oil palm plantation zones, both as domination force and object of resistance.

Collaborative analysis and writing constitute an additional interesting element of the book. Li and Semejo have included an appendix presenting the challenges of writing collaboratively and considering the racial, linguistic, and colonial relations of power that define the process. Both authors approach their research from different standpoints and intellectual traditions (the book's preface starts with a conversation between Li and Semejo on what the plantation is and explains how the two authors arrive at different definitions based on their personal trajectories). However, in a rare and significant effort, the authors dedicate a section of the book to show how they account for those differences in the moment of writing, considering the implications of writing this piece in English, the colonial language of global academia.

This book is a significant contribution to understanding labour-capital relations in modern plantations and constitutes a valuable reading for those working in oil palm production and Indonesia. This detailed and deep exploration of life under plantation occupation will serve as a reference for others who can subsequently replicate this effort to study other plantations. As Li and Semejo observe, this book invites comparison to help us understand why these forms of life appear and refine our theoretical understanding of corporations, state power, and accumulation in the time of the ‘global plantation’ and the ‘plantationocene’.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信