Ressy Fitria, Michael Timothy, Roald Marck J. Revellame
{"title":"利用基于能量和水平衡的水文模型评估蒸散量","authors":"Ressy Fitria, Michael Timothy, Roald Marck J. Revellame","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2024.499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The reliability of evapotranspiration (ET) models is crucial to comprehending land–atmosphere interactions and water balance dynamics in various available resources of the model. This study compared two different models based on energy and water balance models, a surface energy balance system (SEBS) and SPHY, and evaluated against ground observation data from flux towers for different land cover characteristics (forest and savanna) in Southeast Africa. We found that both models have a good correlation with flux tower data for both sites (ZM-Mon and ZM-Kru). The SEBS model showed a lower root-mean-square error (RMSE; 2.17 mm day−1) at the savanna site (ZM-Kru) than the SPHY model (2.27 mm day−1). However, at the forest site (ZM-Mon), the SEBS model showed a higher RMSE value (1.90 mm day−1) than the SPHY model (0.88 mm day−1). Then, we analyzed the ET model's sensitivity to the precipitation variable. We found that SPHY overestimated ET during the winter season and underestimated it during the summer season, which might be influenced by the dependency of the SPHY model to water excess and water shortage stress parameters in ET calculations. Overall, SPHY, with fewer input data, showed a reasonably good result compared to the SEBS. The results revealed that each model possesses its unique strengths and limitations in relation to specific land covers and vegetation composition, offering opportunities for improvement and optimization.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of evapotranspiration using energy-based and water balance hydrological models\",\"authors\":\"Ressy Fitria, Michael Timothy, Roald Marck J. Revellame\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wcc.2024.499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The reliability of evapotranspiration (ET) models is crucial to comprehending land–atmosphere interactions and water balance dynamics in various available resources of the model. This study compared two different models based on energy and water balance models, a surface energy balance system (SEBS) and SPHY, and evaluated against ground observation data from flux towers for different land cover characteristics (forest and savanna) in Southeast Africa. We found that both models have a good correlation with flux tower data for both sites (ZM-Mon and ZM-Kru). The SEBS model showed a lower root-mean-square error (RMSE; 2.17 mm day−1) at the savanna site (ZM-Kru) than the SPHY model (2.27 mm day−1). However, at the forest site (ZM-Mon), the SEBS model showed a higher RMSE value (1.90 mm day−1) than the SPHY model (0.88 mm day−1). Then, we analyzed the ET model's sensitivity to the precipitation variable. We found that SPHY overestimated ET during the winter season and underestimated it during the summer season, which might be influenced by the dependency of the SPHY model to water excess and water shortage stress parameters in ET calculations. Overall, SPHY, with fewer input data, showed a reasonably good result compared to the SEBS. The results revealed that each model possesses its unique strengths and limitations in relation to specific land covers and vegetation composition, offering opportunities for improvement and optimization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"79 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of evapotranspiration using energy-based and water balance hydrological models
The reliability of evapotranspiration (ET) models is crucial to comprehending land–atmosphere interactions and water balance dynamics in various available resources of the model. This study compared two different models based on energy and water balance models, a surface energy balance system (SEBS) and SPHY, and evaluated against ground observation data from flux towers for different land cover characteristics (forest and savanna) in Southeast Africa. We found that both models have a good correlation with flux tower data for both sites (ZM-Mon and ZM-Kru). The SEBS model showed a lower root-mean-square error (RMSE; 2.17 mm day−1) at the savanna site (ZM-Kru) than the SPHY model (2.27 mm day−1). However, at the forest site (ZM-Mon), the SEBS model showed a higher RMSE value (1.90 mm day−1) than the SPHY model (0.88 mm day−1). Then, we analyzed the ET model's sensitivity to the precipitation variable. We found that SPHY overestimated ET during the winter season and underestimated it during the summer season, which might be influenced by the dependency of the SPHY model to water excess and water shortage stress parameters in ET calculations. Overall, SPHY, with fewer input data, showed a reasonably good result compared to the SEBS. The results revealed that each model possesses its unique strengths and limitations in relation to specific land covers and vegetation composition, offering opportunities for improvement and optimization.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications.
The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.