沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心的病人家属对病人症状负担的看法和对姑息治疗服务的满意度

Steven Callaghan, Gassan Abudari, Kim Sadler, Muneerah Almutairi, Fawad Ahmad, Wafa Alalwani
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心的病人家属对病人症状负担的看法和对姑息治疗服务的满意度","authors":"Steven Callaghan, Gassan Abudari, Kim Sadler, Muneerah Almutairi, Fawad Ahmad, Wafa Alalwani","doi":"10.36348/sjnhc.2024.v07i01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore the family caregivers (FCs) perception of patients’ symptom burden as well as their experience and satisfaction with specialized palliative care services (PCS) in a tertiary care center in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: A cross-sectional design assessed patients known to the PCS in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabic from May 2023 to September 2023. FCs perceptions of patient’s symptom burden and satisfaction with PCS were studied through the Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care Scale (FAMCARE-2) and Arabic Questionnaire for Symptom Assessment (AQSA). Results: A convenience sample of 264 FCs agreed to participate (response rate = 94%). Approximately half of the participants were male (n=146; 55.7%). Participants were mostly aged between 30 to 50 years (n =148; 56%). Approximately half were receiving disease-modifying treatments. 101 (38.3%) had a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order. There was high satisfaction with how the services respected the dignity FCs (M = 4.6; SD=0.6). FCs were less satisfied with ‘the practical assistance provided by the PCS’ (M = 4.1; SD = 0.9). Satisfaction was higher in the outpatient setting (M = 4.3, SD = 0.7). The most severe symptom reported by FCs was ‘tiredness’, followed by ‘pain’. The mildest ones were ‘shortness of breath’, followed by ‘nausea/vomiting’. Conclusion: Overall, FCs have reported a positive experience with inpatient and outpatient PCS. FCs' greater satisfaction was observed in the outpatient setting with the possible rationale that inpatients are often more unstable and symptomatic.","PeriodicalId":498237,"journal":{"name":"Saudi journal of nursing and health care","volume":"374 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Caregivers Perceptions of Patient’s Symptom Burden and Satisfaction with Palliative Care Services in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Steven Callaghan, Gassan Abudari, Kim Sadler, Muneerah Almutairi, Fawad Ahmad, Wafa Alalwani\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/sjnhc.2024.v07i01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to explore the family caregivers (FCs) perception of patients’ symptom burden as well as their experience and satisfaction with specialized palliative care services (PCS) in a tertiary care center in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: A cross-sectional design assessed patients known to the PCS in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabic from May 2023 to September 2023. FCs perceptions of patient’s symptom burden and satisfaction with PCS were studied through the Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care Scale (FAMCARE-2) and Arabic Questionnaire for Symptom Assessment (AQSA). Results: A convenience sample of 264 FCs agreed to participate (response rate = 94%). Approximately half of the participants were male (n=146; 55.7%). Participants were mostly aged between 30 to 50 years (n =148; 56%). Approximately half were receiving disease-modifying treatments. 101 (38.3%) had a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order. There was high satisfaction with how the services respected the dignity FCs (M = 4.6; SD=0.6). FCs were less satisfied with ‘the practical assistance provided by the PCS’ (M = 4.1; SD = 0.9). Satisfaction was higher in the outpatient setting (M = 4.3, SD = 0.7). The most severe symptom reported by FCs was ‘tiredness’, followed by ‘pain’. The mildest ones were ‘shortness of breath’, followed by ‘nausea/vomiting’. Conclusion: Overall, FCs have reported a positive experience with inpatient and outpatient PCS. FCs' greater satisfaction was observed in the outpatient setting with the possible rationale that inpatients are often more unstable and symptomatic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":498237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi journal of nursing and health care\",\"volume\":\"374 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi journal of nursing and health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjnhc.2024.v07i01.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi journal of nursing and health care","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjnhc.2024.v07i01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)一家三级医疗中心的家庭护理者(FCs)对患者症状负担的感知,以及他们对专业姑息关怀服务(PCS)的体验和满意度。研究方法采用横断面设计,对 2023 年 5 月至 2023 年 9 月期间在沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心接受姑息关怀服务的已知患者进行评估。通过家属对临终关怀满意度量表(FAMCARE-2)和阿拉伯语症状评估问卷(AQSA)研究了家属对患者症状负担的看法以及对 PCS 的满意度。结果:264名临终关怀者同意参加此次研究(回复率=94%)。约半数参与者为男性(n=146;55.7%)。参与者的年龄大多在 30 至 50 岁之间(n=148;56%)。约半数参与者正在接受疾病修饰治疗。101人(38.3%)下达了 "不尝试人工呼吸"(DNAR)命令。功能界别对服务尊重其尊严的满意度很高(M = 4.6;SD=0.6)。功能界别对 "个人护理服务提供的实际帮助 "的满意度较低(M = 4.1;SD = 0.9)。在门诊环境中,满意度较高(中=4.3,标度=0.7)。功能界别报告的最严重的症状是 "疲倦",其次是 "疼痛"。最轻微的症状是 "呼吸急促",其次是 "恶心/呕吐"。结论总体而言,功能界别对住院和门诊 PCS 的体验良好。据观察,功能界别对门诊病人的满意度更高,其原因可能是住院病人的病情往往更不稳定,症状更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Caregivers Perceptions of Patient’s Symptom Burden and Satisfaction with Palliative Care Services in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia
This study aimed to explore the family caregivers (FCs) perception of patients’ symptom burden as well as their experience and satisfaction with specialized palliative care services (PCS) in a tertiary care center in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: A cross-sectional design assessed patients known to the PCS in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabic from May 2023 to September 2023. FCs perceptions of patient’s symptom burden and satisfaction with PCS were studied through the Family Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care Scale (FAMCARE-2) and Arabic Questionnaire for Symptom Assessment (AQSA). Results: A convenience sample of 264 FCs agreed to participate (response rate = 94%). Approximately half of the participants were male (n=146; 55.7%). Participants were mostly aged between 30 to 50 years (n =148; 56%). Approximately half were receiving disease-modifying treatments. 101 (38.3%) had a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order. There was high satisfaction with how the services respected the dignity FCs (M = 4.6; SD=0.6). FCs were less satisfied with ‘the practical assistance provided by the PCS’ (M = 4.1; SD = 0.9). Satisfaction was higher in the outpatient setting (M = 4.3, SD = 0.7). The most severe symptom reported by FCs was ‘tiredness’, followed by ‘pain’. The mildest ones were ‘shortness of breath’, followed by ‘nausea/vomiting’. Conclusion: Overall, FCs have reported a positive experience with inpatient and outpatient PCS. FCs' greater satisfaction was observed in the outpatient setting with the possible rationale that inpatients are often more unstable and symptomatic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信