利用相似性比较法分析电子文本中的作者身份

Devi Ambarwati Puspitasari, Hanif Fakhrurroja, Adi Sutrisno
{"title":"利用相似性比较法分析电子文本中的作者身份","authors":"Devi Ambarwati Puspitasari, Hanif Fakhrurroja, Adi Sutrisno","doi":"10.26499/li.v42i1.544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most recent changes to the criteria in legal process for scientific evidence have emphasized scientific methods of authorship analysis. This study examined the authorship of electronic texts using a quantitative method based on forensic stylistics and computer technologies. This study uses 300 digital texts produced by 100 authors, including 100 questioned texts (Q-text) and 200 known texts (K-text). Personal texts of WhatsApp messages are used in this study as electronic texts. Authorship analysis was conducted by tracing the n-gram and testing all the text sets using the Similarity Comparison Method (SCM). Based on the results of the word 1-gram test, the SCM accuracy was found to be quite high, ranging from 85% to 96%. The findings of employing the tiny set are promising, with the various stylistic traits offering dependable accuracy ranging from 92% to 98.5%. The character-level n-gram tracing indicates a key feature of authorship attribution.","PeriodicalId":221379,"journal":{"name":"Linguistik Indonesia","volume":"333 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AUTHORSHIP ANALYSIS IN ELECTRONIC TEXTS USING SIMILARITY COMPARISON METHOD\",\"authors\":\"Devi Ambarwati Puspitasari, Hanif Fakhrurroja, Adi Sutrisno\",\"doi\":\"10.26499/li.v42i1.544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most recent changes to the criteria in legal process for scientific evidence have emphasized scientific methods of authorship analysis. This study examined the authorship of electronic texts using a quantitative method based on forensic stylistics and computer technologies. This study uses 300 digital texts produced by 100 authors, including 100 questioned texts (Q-text) and 200 known texts (K-text). Personal texts of WhatsApp messages are used in this study as electronic texts. Authorship analysis was conducted by tracing the n-gram and testing all the text sets using the Similarity Comparison Method (SCM). Based on the results of the word 1-gram test, the SCM accuracy was found to be quite high, ranging from 85% to 96%. The findings of employing the tiny set are promising, with the various stylistic traits offering dependable accuracy ranging from 92% to 98.5%. The character-level n-gram tracing indicates a key feature of authorship attribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistik Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"333 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistik Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v42i1.544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistik Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v42i1.544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法律程序中科学证据标准的最新变化强调了作者身份分析的科学方法。本研究采用基于法医文体学和计算机技术的定量方法,对电子文本的作者身份进行了研究。本研究使用了 100 名作者制作的 300 个数字文本,包括 100 个疑问文本(Q-text)和 200 个已知文本(K-text)。本研究使用 WhatsApp 消息中的个人文本作为电子文本。作者分析是通过追踪 n-gram,并使用相似性比较法(SCM)测试所有文本集。根据单词 1-gram 测试的结果,发现 SCM 的准确率相当高,从 85% 到 96% 不等。使用微小集的结果很有希望,各种文体特征的准确率在 92% 到 98.5% 之间,值得信赖。字符级 n-gram 追踪显示了作者归属的一个关键特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AUTHORSHIP ANALYSIS IN ELECTRONIC TEXTS USING SIMILARITY COMPARISON METHOD
The most recent changes to the criteria in legal process for scientific evidence have emphasized scientific methods of authorship analysis. This study examined the authorship of electronic texts using a quantitative method based on forensic stylistics and computer technologies. This study uses 300 digital texts produced by 100 authors, including 100 questioned texts (Q-text) and 200 known texts (K-text). Personal texts of WhatsApp messages are used in this study as electronic texts. Authorship analysis was conducted by tracing the n-gram and testing all the text sets using the Similarity Comparison Method (SCM). Based on the results of the word 1-gram test, the SCM accuracy was found to be quite high, ranging from 85% to 96%. The findings of employing the tiny set are promising, with the various stylistic traits offering dependable accuracy ranging from 92% to 98.5%. The character-level n-gram tracing indicates a key feature of authorship attribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信