使用 GRADE 证据决策框架与少数民族社区组织共同达成建议:以英国 COVID-19 疫苗接种为例。

Shaun Treweek, Miriam Brazzelli, Annette Crosse, Sunil Daga, Talia Isaacs, Ria Sunga
{"title":"使用 GRADE 证据决策框架与少数民族社区组织共同达成建议:以英国 COVID-19 疫苗接种为例。","authors":"Shaun Treweek, Miriam Brazzelli, Annette Crosse, Sunil Daga, Talia Isaacs, Ria Sunga","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4489633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo make recommendations regarding factors that affect COVID-19 vaccine uptake by ethnic minority individuals in the UK, together with strategies that could be used to increase uptake.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN AND SETTING\nThe results of two rapid systematic reviews- one identifying factors that affect respiratory vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults, the other identifying experimental evaluations of strategies to increase vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults- were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks to support discussion with a panel of ethnic minority community organisations, community-focused small companies and academics of the relevance of the review findings to the UK COVID context. Aided by the Frameworks, the panel made recommendations for factors that need to be addressed to increase vaccine uptake, and for which strategies might be used to increase uptake.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOur two reviews contained 31 relevant research studies published in English between 2016 and 2021, all of which were from the UK (8/31), the US (20) and Australia (3). We identified six factors- two linked to trust, three linked to information and one on accessibility - that affected uptake. Strategies that had been evaluated fell into three categories: using trusted messengers, tailoring the message and increasing convenience. These were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks and discussed over a series of meetings with individuals from nine ethnic minority community organisations, two community-focused small companies and academics. Community partners provided insight into why ethnic minority individuals in the UK had lower vaccine uptake, particularly with regard to the impact of non-health related UK Government policy on individuals' heath decision-making. Recommendations included recognising that trust will be low among some ethnic groups, thinking more broadly as to who messengers should be in a low-trust environment, ensuring that information is tailored to the information needs of specific ethnic groups and working to increase convenience. Our results are at https://www.collaborationforchange.co.uk.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nGRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks could be used more widely to structure discussions of research evidence between researchers, community organisations and other non-research partners.","PeriodicalId":510190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"531 ","pages":"111268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the GRADE Evidence to Decision Framework to reach recommendations together with ethnic minority community organisations: the example of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Treweek, Miriam Brazzelli, Annette Crosse, Sunil Daga, Talia Isaacs, Ria Sunga\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4489633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo make recommendations regarding factors that affect COVID-19 vaccine uptake by ethnic minority individuals in the UK, together with strategies that could be used to increase uptake.\\n\\n\\nSTUDY DESIGN AND SETTING\\nThe results of two rapid systematic reviews- one identifying factors that affect respiratory vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults, the other identifying experimental evaluations of strategies to increase vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults- were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks to support discussion with a panel of ethnic minority community organisations, community-focused small companies and academics of the relevance of the review findings to the UK COVID context. Aided by the Frameworks, the panel made recommendations for factors that need to be addressed to increase vaccine uptake, and for which strategies might be used to increase uptake.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOur two reviews contained 31 relevant research studies published in English between 2016 and 2021, all of which were from the UK (8/31), the US (20) and Australia (3). We identified six factors- two linked to trust, three linked to information and one on accessibility - that affected uptake. Strategies that had been evaluated fell into three categories: using trusted messengers, tailoring the message and increasing convenience. These were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks and discussed over a series of meetings with individuals from nine ethnic minority community organisations, two community-focused small companies and academics. Community partners provided insight into why ethnic minority individuals in the UK had lower vaccine uptake, particularly with regard to the impact of non-health related UK Government policy on individuals' heath decision-making. Recommendations included recognising that trust will be low among some ethnic groups, thinking more broadly as to who messengers should be in a low-trust environment, ensuring that information is tailored to the information needs of specific ethnic groups and working to increase convenience. Our results are at https://www.collaborationforchange.co.uk.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nGRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks could be used more widely to structure discussions of research evidence between researchers, community organisations and other non-research partners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"531 \",\"pages\":\"111268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4489633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4489633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的就影响英国少数民族接种 COVID-19 疫苗的因素以及提高接种率的策略提出建议。研究设计与背景两篇快速系统综述的结果--一篇确定了影响少数民族成年人呼吸道疫苗接种率的因素,另一篇确定了提高少数民族成年人疫苗接种率策略的实验评估--被纳入 GRADE 证据决策框架,以支持少数民族社区组织、以社区为重点的小型公司和学者小组讨论综述结果与英国 COVID 情况的相关性。结果我们的两篇综述包含了 2016 年至 2021 年间用英语发表的 31 项相关研究,所有研究均来自英国(8/31)、美国(20)和澳大利亚(3)。我们确定了影响接受度的六个因素--两个与信任有关,三个与信息有关,一个与可及性有关。经过评估的策略分为三类:使用可信的信使、定制信息和提高便利性。这些策略被纳入 GRADE "从证据到决策 "框架,并在一系列会议上与来自九个少数民族社区组织、两家以社区为重点的小公司的个人和学者进行了讨论。社区合作伙伴深入探讨了英国少数族裔个人疫苗接种率较低的原因,特别是英国政府与健康无关的政策对个人健康决策的影响。提出的建议包括:认识到某些种族群体的信任度较低;更广泛地考虑在信任度较低的环境中谁是信息传递者;确保信息符合特定种族群体的信息需求;努力提高便利性。我们的结果见 https://www.collaborationforchange.co.uk.CONCLUSIONGRADE "从证据到决策 "框架可更广泛地用于组织研究人员、社区组织和其他非研究合作伙伴之间的研究证据讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the GRADE Evidence to Decision Framework to reach recommendations together with ethnic minority community organisations: the example of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the UK.
OBJECTIVE To make recommendations regarding factors that affect COVID-19 vaccine uptake by ethnic minority individuals in the UK, together with strategies that could be used to increase uptake. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The results of two rapid systematic reviews- one identifying factors that affect respiratory vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults, the other identifying experimental evaluations of strategies to increase vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults- were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks to support discussion with a panel of ethnic minority community organisations, community-focused small companies and academics of the relevance of the review findings to the UK COVID context. Aided by the Frameworks, the panel made recommendations for factors that need to be addressed to increase vaccine uptake, and for which strategies might be used to increase uptake. RESULTS Our two reviews contained 31 relevant research studies published in English between 2016 and 2021, all of which were from the UK (8/31), the US (20) and Australia (3). We identified six factors- two linked to trust, three linked to information and one on accessibility - that affected uptake. Strategies that had been evaluated fell into three categories: using trusted messengers, tailoring the message and increasing convenience. These were put into GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks and discussed over a series of meetings with individuals from nine ethnic minority community organisations, two community-focused small companies and academics. Community partners provided insight into why ethnic minority individuals in the UK had lower vaccine uptake, particularly with regard to the impact of non-health related UK Government policy on individuals' heath decision-making. Recommendations included recognising that trust will be low among some ethnic groups, thinking more broadly as to who messengers should be in a low-trust environment, ensuring that information is tailored to the information needs of specific ethnic groups and working to increase convenience. Our results are at https://www.collaborationforchange.co.uk. CONCLUSION GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks could be used more widely to structure discussions of research evidence between researchers, community organisations and other non-research partners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信