观察自动化管理使用自助采样包的情况

Q4 Multidisciplinary
D. Gavars, Egīls Gulbis, Mikus Gavars, Jānis Stašulāns, Valdis Gavars, Justīne Grundmane, Anna Stašulāne
{"title":"观察自动化管理使用自助采样包的情况","authors":"D. Gavars, Egīls Gulbis, Mikus Gavars, Jānis Stašulāns, Valdis Gavars, Justīne Grundmane, Anna Stašulāne","doi":"10.2478/prolas-2024-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the current times of ever-growing prevalence of infectious diseases, it is requisite to explore ways to provide the safest and most effective medical care for our patients. The aim of this study is to explain how the issues raised by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were addressed by the E. Gulbis Laboratory in Latvia. The study looks back on the goal to introduce an automated and effective solution for the management of self-collected samples. The study is primarily aimed to formulate the conclusions about the data and use of automation in the self-sample kit collection. Results were collected from 18 automated (contactless) sample collection devices used by E. Gulbis Laboratory. Sixty-four thousand two hundred fifty-seven (64,257) saliva kits for SARSCoV-2 PCR testing were employed. It was found that 3.92% of them were positive (SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA found in saliva sample). The average processing time in automated devices located in the capital city was 11.13 hours, in the suburbs — 15.52 hours, rest of the country — 17.60 hours. The average age of patients that choose an automatic device to hand in their saliva sample kits was 33.94 years. These results suggest that by using the automated device, patient contacts are decreased, and direct communication with medical staff is excluded, which reduces the risk of infection during processing. Automated devices make sample kit distribution available 24 hours. They save workforce resources in the laboratory that are already very limited, especially during a pandemic period.","PeriodicalId":20651,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observation of Automated Management Use of Self-Sampling Kits\",\"authors\":\"D. Gavars, Egīls Gulbis, Mikus Gavars, Jānis Stašulāns, Valdis Gavars, Justīne Grundmane, Anna Stašulāne\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/prolas-2024-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the current times of ever-growing prevalence of infectious diseases, it is requisite to explore ways to provide the safest and most effective medical care for our patients. The aim of this study is to explain how the issues raised by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were addressed by the E. Gulbis Laboratory in Latvia. The study looks back on the goal to introduce an automated and effective solution for the management of self-collected samples. The study is primarily aimed to formulate the conclusions about the data and use of automation in the self-sample kit collection. Results were collected from 18 automated (contactless) sample collection devices used by E. Gulbis Laboratory. Sixty-four thousand two hundred fifty-seven (64,257) saliva kits for SARSCoV-2 PCR testing were employed. It was found that 3.92% of them were positive (SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA found in saliva sample). The average processing time in automated devices located in the capital city was 11.13 hours, in the suburbs — 15.52 hours, rest of the country — 17.60 hours. The average age of patients that choose an automatic device to hand in their saliva sample kits was 33.94 years. These results suggest that by using the automated device, patient contacts are decreased, and direct communication with medical staff is excluded, which reduces the risk of infection during processing. Automated devices make sample kit distribution available 24 hours. They save workforce resources in the laboratory that are already very limited, especially during a pandemic period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2024-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2024-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前传染病日益流行的时代,有必要探索如何为病人提供最安全、最有效的医疗服务。本研究旨在解释拉脱维亚 E. Gulbis 实验室是如何解决 SARS-CoV-2 大流行所带来的问题的。本研究回顾了拉脱维亚 E. Gulbis 实验室为管理自采样本而引入自动化有效解决方案的目标。该研究的主要目的是就数据和自动化在自采样包收集中的应用得出结论。E. Gulbis 实验室使用的 18 个自动化(非接触式)样本采集设备收集了结果。使用了六万四千二百五十七(64,257)个唾液试剂盒进行 SARSCoV-2 PCR 检测。结果发现,其中 3.92% 呈阳性(唾液样本中发现 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 RNA)。首都的自动设备平均处理时间为 11.13 小时,郊区为 15.52 小时,全国其他地区为 17.60 小时。选择自动设备递交唾液样本包的患者平均年龄为 33.94 岁。这些结果表明,通过使用自动装置,减少了与患者的接触,排除了与医务人员的直接交流,从而降低了处理过程中的感染风险。自动化设备可 24 小时分发样本试剂盒。它们节省了实验室本已非常有限的劳动力资源,尤其是在大流行期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observation of Automated Management Use of Self-Sampling Kits
In the current times of ever-growing prevalence of infectious diseases, it is requisite to explore ways to provide the safest and most effective medical care for our patients. The aim of this study is to explain how the issues raised by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were addressed by the E. Gulbis Laboratory in Latvia. The study looks back on the goal to introduce an automated and effective solution for the management of self-collected samples. The study is primarily aimed to formulate the conclusions about the data and use of automation in the self-sample kit collection. Results were collected from 18 automated (contactless) sample collection devices used by E. Gulbis Laboratory. Sixty-four thousand two hundred fifty-seven (64,257) saliva kits for SARSCoV-2 PCR testing were employed. It was found that 3.92% of them were positive (SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA found in saliva sample). The average processing time in automated devices located in the capital city was 11.13 hours, in the suburbs — 15.52 hours, rest of the country — 17.60 hours. The average age of patients that choose an automatic device to hand in their saliva sample kits was 33.94 years. These results suggest that by using the automated device, patient contacts are decreased, and direct communication with medical staff is excluded, which reduces the risk of infection during processing. Automated devices make sample kit distribution available 24 hours. They save workforce resources in the laboratory that are already very limited, especially during a pandemic period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信