Anand Brahmandam MD , Joshua Huttler BA , Kirthi Bellamkonda MSc , Ocean Setia MD , Jonathan A. Cardella MD , William Stewart PhD , Raul J. Guzman MD , Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar MD, MS, MPH
{"title":"股骨头、腹股沟韧带和股总动脉分叉的放射关系,以实现最佳血管通路","authors":"Anand Brahmandam MD , Joshua Huttler BA , Kirthi Bellamkonda MSc , Ocean Setia MD , Jonathan A. Cardella MD , William Stewart PhD , Raul J. Guzman MD , Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar MD, MS, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jvssci.2024.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Common femoral artery (CFA) access is commonly used for endovascular interventions. Access site complications contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. This study characterizes the radiographic variability in the relationship of the femoral head, the inguinal ligament, and the CFA bifurcation, to identify the zone of optimal CFA access.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Human cadaver dissection of the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation was performed. The inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation were marked with radiopaque pins and plain anteroposterior radiographs were obtained. Radiographic measurements of the femoral head length, the distance of the top of the femoral head to the inguinal ligament, and to the CFA bifurcation were obtained. Results were reported as percentage of femoral head covered by the inguinal ligament or the CFA bifurcation relative to the top of the femoral head. A heatmap was derived to determine a safe access zone between the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-five groin dissections (male, n = 20; female, n = 25) were performed in 26 cadavers. The mean overlap of the inguinal ligament with the femoral head was 11.2 mm (range, −19.4 to 27.4 mm). There were no age (<85 vs ≥85 years) or sex-related differences. In 82.6% of cadaveric CFA exposures, there was overlap between the inguinal ligament and femoral head (mean, 27.7%; range, −85.7% to 70.1%), with 55.6% having a >25% overlap. In 11.1%, there was an overlap between the lower one-third of the femoral head and the CFA bifurcation. Cumulatively, heatmap analysis depicted a >80% likelihood of avoiding the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation below the midpoint of the femoral head.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant variability exists in the relationship between the inguinal ligament, CFA bifurcation, and the femoral head, suggesting the lack of a consistently safe access zone. The safest access zone in >80% of patients lies below the radiographic midpoint of the femoral head and the inferior aspect of the femoral head.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74035,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular science","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350324000075/pdfft?md5=74563e889c098870416176f9c73dad33&pid=1-s2.0-S2666350324000075-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The radiographic relationship of the femoral head, inguinal ligament, and common femoral artery bifurcation for optimal vascular access\",\"authors\":\"Anand Brahmandam MD , Joshua Huttler BA , Kirthi Bellamkonda MSc , Ocean Setia MD , Jonathan A. Cardella MD , William Stewart PhD , Raul J. Guzman MD , Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar MD, MS, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvssci.2024.100196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Common femoral artery (CFA) access is commonly used for endovascular interventions. Access site complications contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. This study characterizes the radiographic variability in the relationship of the femoral head, the inguinal ligament, and the CFA bifurcation, to identify the zone of optimal CFA access.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Human cadaver dissection of the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation was performed. The inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation were marked with radiopaque pins and plain anteroposterior radiographs were obtained. Radiographic measurements of the femoral head length, the distance of the top of the femoral head to the inguinal ligament, and to the CFA bifurcation were obtained. Results were reported as percentage of femoral head covered by the inguinal ligament or the CFA bifurcation relative to the top of the femoral head. A heatmap was derived to determine a safe access zone between the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-five groin dissections (male, n = 20; female, n = 25) were performed in 26 cadavers. The mean overlap of the inguinal ligament with the femoral head was 11.2 mm (range, −19.4 to 27.4 mm). There were no age (<85 vs ≥85 years) or sex-related differences. In 82.6% of cadaveric CFA exposures, there was overlap between the inguinal ligament and femoral head (mean, 27.7%; range, −85.7% to 70.1%), with 55.6% having a >25% overlap. In 11.1%, there was an overlap between the lower one-third of the femoral head and the CFA bifurcation. Cumulatively, heatmap analysis depicted a >80% likelihood of avoiding the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation below the midpoint of the femoral head.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant variability exists in the relationship between the inguinal ligament, CFA bifurcation, and the femoral head, suggesting the lack of a consistently safe access zone. The safest access zone in >80% of patients lies below the radiographic midpoint of the femoral head and the inferior aspect of the femoral head.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350324000075/pdfft?md5=74563e889c098870416176f9c73dad33&pid=1-s2.0-S2666350324000075-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350324000075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350324000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的股总动脉(CFA)入路通常用于血管内介入治疗。入路部位并发症会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。本研究描述了股骨头、腹股沟韧带和 CFA 分叉关系的影像学变异性,以确定最佳 CFA 入路区域。腹股沟韧带和主动脉分叉处用不透射线的针做标记,并拍摄普通的前胸X光片。对股骨头长度、股骨头顶部到腹股沟韧带的距离以及到CFA分叉的距离进行X光测量。测量结果以腹股沟韧带或CFA分叉相对于股骨头顶部覆盖股骨头的百分比进行报告。结果在26具尸体上进行了45例腹股沟解剖(男性,n = 20;女性,n = 25)。腹股沟韧带与股骨头的平均重叠度为 11.2 毫米(范围:-19.4 至 27.4 毫米)。没有年龄(85 岁与≥85 岁)或性别差异。在82.6%的尸体CFA暴露中,腹股沟韧带和股骨头之间存在重叠(平均为27.7%;范围为-85.7%至70.1%),其中55.6%的重叠率为25%。11.1%的患者股骨头下1/3与CFA分叉处重叠。结论腹股沟韧带、CFA分叉和股骨头之间的关系存在显著差异,表明缺乏一致的安全进入区。80%的患者的最安全入路区位于股骨头放射学中点和股骨头下侧的下方。
The radiographic relationship of the femoral head, inguinal ligament, and common femoral artery bifurcation for optimal vascular access
Objective
Common femoral artery (CFA) access is commonly used for endovascular interventions. Access site complications contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. This study characterizes the radiographic variability in the relationship of the femoral head, the inguinal ligament, and the CFA bifurcation, to identify the zone of optimal CFA access.
Methods
Human cadaver dissection of the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation was performed. The inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation were marked with radiopaque pins and plain anteroposterior radiographs were obtained. Radiographic measurements of the femoral head length, the distance of the top of the femoral head to the inguinal ligament, and to the CFA bifurcation were obtained. Results were reported as percentage of femoral head covered by the inguinal ligament or the CFA bifurcation relative to the top of the femoral head. A heatmap was derived to determine a safe access zone between the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation.
Results
Forty-five groin dissections (male, n = 20; female, n = 25) were performed in 26 cadavers. The mean overlap of the inguinal ligament with the femoral head was 11.2 mm (range, −19.4 to 27.4 mm). There were no age (<85 vs ≥85 years) or sex-related differences. In 82.6% of cadaveric CFA exposures, there was overlap between the inguinal ligament and femoral head (mean, 27.7%; range, −85.7% to 70.1%), with 55.6% having a >25% overlap. In 11.1%, there was an overlap between the lower one-third of the femoral head and the CFA bifurcation. Cumulatively, heatmap analysis depicted a >80% likelihood of avoiding the inguinal ligament and CFA bifurcation below the midpoint of the femoral head.
Conclusions
Significant variability exists in the relationship between the inguinal ligament, CFA bifurcation, and the femoral head, suggesting the lack of a consistently safe access zone. The safest access zone in >80% of patients lies below the radiographic midpoint of the femoral head and the inferior aspect of the femoral head.