杀螨剂对蜜蜂蜂群中破坏变种虫侵扰的影响及其对下咽腺的组织学影响。

A. Amro, Asmaa ABD ALLA, Rasha Salem, Mohamed EL-SAYİED HASHİSH
{"title":"杀螨剂对蜜蜂蜂群中破坏变种虫侵扰的影响及其对下咽腺的组织学影响。","authors":"A. Amro, Asmaa ABD ALLA, Rasha Salem, Mohamed EL-SAYİED HASHİSH","doi":"10.31467/uluaricilik.1410005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the random role of some acaricides, which are the most commonly used in Egypt for controlling Varroa destructor on Hypopharyngeal Glands of honeybee. The acaricides used in this study were Varroakiller, Menthocaros, Amitraz, Varroby, and formic acid. Results showed that the total number of fallen mites was 53.5, 47, 28.6, 26, and 24.5 for Varroakiller, Menthocaros, Amitraz, Varroby, and formic acid, respectively, compared to 16 mites in the control group. For sealed worker brood areas (SWBA), the treatments included Varroakiller (129.125 in2), formic acid (90.125 in2), Varroby (87.50 in2), Menthocaros (51.07 in2), and Amitraz (40.05 in2), while the SWBA for control colonies was 17.65 in2. Histological studies of the hypopharyngeal gland showed that although, Varroakiller effectively controlled Varroa mites and had no direct impact on worker bees or egg-laying areas, it considerably impacted the hypopharyngeal glands, which could ultimately affect the bee colony. Moreover, formic acid recorded a lower number of fallen Varroa with acceptable outcomes for egg-laying areas and sealed workers. This, coupled with the fact that formic acid was deemed the most significant due to its effectiveness over a short period, resulted in a reduction percentage of 100% after 24 days.","PeriodicalId":104346,"journal":{"name":"Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPACT OF ACARICIDES ON VARROA DESTRUCTOR INFESTATION IN HONEYBEE COLONIES (APIS MELLIFERA) AND THEIR HISTOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON HYPOPHARYNGEAL GLANDS.\",\"authors\":\"A. Amro, Asmaa ABD ALLA, Rasha Salem, Mohamed EL-SAYİED HASHİSH\",\"doi\":\"10.31467/uluaricilik.1410005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to determine the random role of some acaricides, which are the most commonly used in Egypt for controlling Varroa destructor on Hypopharyngeal Glands of honeybee. The acaricides used in this study were Varroakiller, Menthocaros, Amitraz, Varroby, and formic acid. Results showed that the total number of fallen mites was 53.5, 47, 28.6, 26, and 24.5 for Varroakiller, Menthocaros, Amitraz, Varroby, and formic acid, respectively, compared to 16 mites in the control group. For sealed worker brood areas (SWBA), the treatments included Varroakiller (129.125 in2), formic acid (90.125 in2), Varroby (87.50 in2), Menthocaros (51.07 in2), and Amitraz (40.05 in2), while the SWBA for control colonies was 17.65 in2. Histological studies of the hypopharyngeal gland showed that although, Varroakiller effectively controlled Varroa mites and had no direct impact on worker bees or egg-laying areas, it considerably impacted the hypopharyngeal glands, which could ultimately affect the bee colony. Moreover, formic acid recorded a lower number of fallen Varroa with acceptable outcomes for egg-laying areas and sealed workers. This, coupled with the fact that formic acid was deemed the most significant due to its effectiveness over a short period, resulted in a reduction percentage of 100% after 24 days.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"61 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.1410005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.1410005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定一些杀螨剂的随机作用,这些杀螨剂在埃及最常用于控制蜜蜂咽下腺上的破坏性精原虫。本研究使用的杀螨剂有 Varroakiller、Menthocaros、Amitraz、Varroby 和甲酸。结果表明,与对照组的 16 只螨虫相比,Varroakiller、Menthocaros、Amitraz、Varroby 和甲酸的落螨总数分别为 53.5、47、28.6、26 和 24.5 只。在密封工蚁育雏区(SWBA)方面,处理组包括 Varroakiller(129.125 平方英寸)、甲酸(90.125 平方英寸)、Varroby(87.50 平方英寸)、Menthocaros(51.07 平方英寸)和 Amitraz(40.05 平方英寸),而对照组的密封工蚁育雏区为 17.65 平方英寸。对下咽腺的组织学研究表明,虽然 Varroakiller 有效地控制了瓦氏螨,对工蜂或产卵区没有直接影响,但它对下咽腺有很大影响,最终会影响蜂群。此外,甲酸还能减少倒伏的瓦氏螨数量,对产卵区和密封工蜂的影响是可以接受的。再加上甲酸因其在短期内的有效性而被认为是最有效的,因此 24 天后的减少率达到了 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPACT OF ACARICIDES ON VARROA DESTRUCTOR INFESTATION IN HONEYBEE COLONIES (APIS MELLIFERA) AND THEIR HISTOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON HYPOPHARYNGEAL GLANDS.
This study aimed to determine the random role of some acaricides, which are the most commonly used in Egypt for controlling Varroa destructor on Hypopharyngeal Glands of honeybee. The acaricides used in this study were Varroakiller, Menthocaros, Amitraz, Varroby, and formic acid. Results showed that the total number of fallen mites was 53.5, 47, 28.6, 26, and 24.5 for Varroakiller, Menthocaros, Amitraz, Varroby, and formic acid, respectively, compared to 16 mites in the control group. For sealed worker brood areas (SWBA), the treatments included Varroakiller (129.125 in2), formic acid (90.125 in2), Varroby (87.50 in2), Menthocaros (51.07 in2), and Amitraz (40.05 in2), while the SWBA for control colonies was 17.65 in2. Histological studies of the hypopharyngeal gland showed that although, Varroakiller effectively controlled Varroa mites and had no direct impact on worker bees or egg-laying areas, it considerably impacted the hypopharyngeal glands, which could ultimately affect the bee colony. Moreover, formic acid recorded a lower number of fallen Varroa with acceptable outcomes for egg-laying areas and sealed workers. This, coupled with the fact that formic acid was deemed the most significant due to its effectiveness over a short period, resulted in a reduction percentage of 100% after 24 days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信