对优酷视频中有关腕管综合征的诊断和治疗信息质量进行内容评估

Jessica Mae A. Salinas, Catherine Sofia G. Aulo, Jethro Niles Cynric A. de Leon, Trisha Nicole S. Lamparero, Luzel Anne P. Picart, Jaime Rene Y. Yuvienco, Christopher Allan F. Reballos
{"title":"对优酷视频中有关腕管综合征的诊断和治疗信息质量进行内容评估","authors":"Jessica Mae A. Salinas, Catherine Sofia G. Aulo, Jethro Niles Cynric A. de Leon, Trisha Nicole S. Lamparero, Luzel Anne P. Picart, Jaime Rene Y. Yuvienco, Christopher Allan F. Reballos","doi":"10.46409/002.ejvx8354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the leading video sharing platforms is YouTube (YT). Due to their increased use, these can possibly create misconceptions about the condition, especially the associated treatment and signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Thus, this evaluates the information quality of YT videos about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). \n\nMethods: This is a descriptive-evaluated study focused on assessing the information qualities of CTS videos on YT. Using Macleod et al. information quality index (2015), modified Diagnostic Information Quality Assessment Checklist (DIQAC) and Treatment Information Quality Assessment Checklist (TIQAC) were utilized. DIQAC measures the elements explanation, history, physical examination and ancillary procedures; while TIQAC, presurgical, surgical procedure, rehabilitation and complication elements. YT videos from 2020 onwards were searched using keywords \"carpal tunnel syndrome\", \"diagnosis\" and \"treatment\", and screened for duplicates, non-related to topic and without audio. Out of 31 videos retrieved, 11 YT videos on CTS were evaluated by physical therapists to determine the reliability of YT videos on CTS.\n\nResults: Results showed that YT-CTS videos are highly reliable in the elements explanation (45%) and history (36.36%), moderate to reliable in ancillary procedure (54.54%) and moderately reliable in physical examination (36%), in terms of DIQAC scoring. Whereas in TIQAC scoring, YT-CTS videos obtained a highly reliable presurgical scoring (45.45%). Surprisingly, it is poorly reliable in complication scoring (45.45%), very poorly to poor reliable in rehabilitation scoring (72.72%), and very poorly reliable in surgical scoring (45.45%). Overall, diagnosis information quality is high (65%), but low treatment information quality (32%). \n\nDiscussion: This demonstrates that YT videos are technological tool that a physical therapist or a clinicians can utilize to educate and diagnose. Treatment information can hardly be explained in videos, which can vary form case to case, and is best explained through medical advice of a doctor to his patient with CTS.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"276 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTENT EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT INFORMATION QUALITIES OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS ON CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Mae A. Salinas, Catherine Sofia G. Aulo, Jethro Niles Cynric A. de Leon, Trisha Nicole S. Lamparero, Luzel Anne P. Picart, Jaime Rene Y. Yuvienco, Christopher Allan F. Reballos\",\"doi\":\"10.46409/002.ejvx8354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: One of the leading video sharing platforms is YouTube (YT). Due to their increased use, these can possibly create misconceptions about the condition, especially the associated treatment and signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Thus, this evaluates the information quality of YT videos about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). \\n\\nMethods: This is a descriptive-evaluated study focused on assessing the information qualities of CTS videos on YT. Using Macleod et al. information quality index (2015), modified Diagnostic Information Quality Assessment Checklist (DIQAC) and Treatment Information Quality Assessment Checklist (TIQAC) were utilized. DIQAC measures the elements explanation, history, physical examination and ancillary procedures; while TIQAC, presurgical, surgical procedure, rehabilitation and complication elements. YT videos from 2020 onwards were searched using keywords \\\"carpal tunnel syndrome\\\", \\\"diagnosis\\\" and \\\"treatment\\\", and screened for duplicates, non-related to topic and without audio. Out of 31 videos retrieved, 11 YT videos on CTS were evaluated by physical therapists to determine the reliability of YT videos on CTS.\\n\\nResults: Results showed that YT-CTS videos are highly reliable in the elements explanation (45%) and history (36.36%), moderate to reliable in ancillary procedure (54.54%) and moderately reliable in physical examination (36%), in terms of DIQAC scoring. Whereas in TIQAC scoring, YT-CTS videos obtained a highly reliable presurgical scoring (45.45%). Surprisingly, it is poorly reliable in complication scoring (45.45%), very poorly to poor reliable in rehabilitation scoring (72.72%), and very poorly reliable in surgical scoring (45.45%). Overall, diagnosis information quality is high (65%), but low treatment information quality (32%). \\n\\nDiscussion: This demonstrates that YT videos are technological tool that a physical therapist or a clinicians can utilize to educate and diagnose. Treatment information can hardly be explained in videos, which can vary form case to case, and is best explained through medical advice of a doctor to his patient with CTS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.ejvx8354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.ejvx8354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介YouTube(YT)是主要的视频共享平台之一。由于其使用率越来越高,这些视频可能会造成对病情的误解,尤其是腕管综合征的相关治疗和症状。因此,本研究评估了 YT 视频中有关腕管综合征(CTS)的信息质量。方法:这是一项描述性评价研究,重点评估 YT 上 CTS 视频的信息质量。采用 Macleod 等人的信息质量指数(2015 年)、修改后的诊断信息质量评估检查表(DIQAC)和治疗信息质量评估检查表(TIQAC)。DIQAC测量解释、病史、体格检查和辅助程序要素;TIQAC测量手术前、手术过程、康复和并发症要素。使用关键词 "腕管综合征"、"诊断 "和 "治疗 "搜索 2020 年以后的 YT 视频,并筛选重复、与主题无关和无音频的视频。在检索到的 31 个视频中,物理治疗师对 11 个有关腕管综合征的 YT 视频进行了评估,以确定有关腕管综合征的 YT 视频的可靠性:结果表明,在 DIQAC 评分方面,YT-CTS 视频在要素解释(45%)和病史(36.36%)方面的可靠性较高,在辅助程序(54.54%)方面的可靠性中等,在体格检查(36%)方面的可靠性中等。而在 TIQAC 评分中,YT-CTS 视频获得了高度可靠的术前评分(45.45%)。令人惊讶的是,它在并发症评分方面的可靠性较差(45.45%),在康复评分方面的可靠性很差至较差(72.72%),在手术评分方面的可靠性很差(45.45%)。总体而言,诊断信息质量较高(65%),但治疗信息质量较低(32%)。讨论这表明,YT 视频是物理治疗师或临床医生可用于教育和诊断的技术工具。治疗信息很难在视频中得到解释,这可能因人而异,最好通过医生对 CTS 患者的医疗建议来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONTENT EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT INFORMATION QUALITIES OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS ON CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME
Introduction: One of the leading video sharing platforms is YouTube (YT). Due to their increased use, these can possibly create misconceptions about the condition, especially the associated treatment and signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Thus, this evaluates the information quality of YT videos about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: This is a descriptive-evaluated study focused on assessing the information qualities of CTS videos on YT. Using Macleod et al. information quality index (2015), modified Diagnostic Information Quality Assessment Checklist (DIQAC) and Treatment Information Quality Assessment Checklist (TIQAC) were utilized. DIQAC measures the elements explanation, history, physical examination and ancillary procedures; while TIQAC, presurgical, surgical procedure, rehabilitation and complication elements. YT videos from 2020 onwards were searched using keywords "carpal tunnel syndrome", "diagnosis" and "treatment", and screened for duplicates, non-related to topic and without audio. Out of 31 videos retrieved, 11 YT videos on CTS were evaluated by physical therapists to determine the reliability of YT videos on CTS. Results: Results showed that YT-CTS videos are highly reliable in the elements explanation (45%) and history (36.36%), moderate to reliable in ancillary procedure (54.54%) and moderately reliable in physical examination (36%), in terms of DIQAC scoring. Whereas in TIQAC scoring, YT-CTS videos obtained a highly reliable presurgical scoring (45.45%). Surprisingly, it is poorly reliable in complication scoring (45.45%), very poorly to poor reliable in rehabilitation scoring (72.72%), and very poorly reliable in surgical scoring (45.45%). Overall, diagnosis information quality is high (65%), but low treatment information quality (32%). Discussion: This demonstrates that YT videos are technological tool that a physical therapist or a clinicians can utilize to educate and diagnose. Treatment information can hardly be explained in videos, which can vary form case to case, and is best explained through medical advice of a doctor to his patient with CTS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信