以 X 存款为例,用马托斯法和统计法预测orf

G. Moldabayeva, A. Kozlovskiy, R. Suleimenova, A. T. Bakesheva, S. Tuzelbayeva, Zhanar B. Shayakhmetova
{"title":"以 X 存款为例,用马托斯法和统计法预测orf","authors":"G. Moldabayeva, A. Kozlovskiy, R. Suleimenova, A. T. Bakesheva, S. Tuzelbayeva, Zhanar B. Shayakhmetova","doi":"10.37878/2708-0080/2024-1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the effectiveness of the Martos method and the statistical method for predicting oil recovery factor using the example of the X field. Today's values of oil recovery factors (ORF) for Triassic horizons were determined taking into account the active water pressure regime with artificial maintenance of reservoir pressure (RPM) and the drilling of 16 new production wells. This approach required a revision of ORF values due to the transition to natural reservoir development and the cessation of maintaining reservoir pressure by water injection. The failure to drill new wells has also had a significant impact on ORF. At current production, when 44.7% of the field's reserves have been extracted, and taking into account the remaining reserves, the development period of the field will not exceed 42 years. It is also planned to increase the number of hydraulic engineering measures to expand drainage zones and involve additional reserves in development. Having compared the two methods for calculating ORF, we can conclude that although V.N. Martos’ method is based on reservoir parameters, and the statistical method uses historical data, the results of their calculations differ slightly.","PeriodicalId":272594,"journal":{"name":"Neft i gaz","volume":"158 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FORECASTING ORF BY THE MARTOS METHOD AND THE STATISTICAL METHOD USING THE EXAMPLE OF DEPOSIT X\",\"authors\":\"G. Moldabayeva, A. Kozlovskiy, R. Suleimenova, A. T. Bakesheva, S. Tuzelbayeva, Zhanar B. Shayakhmetova\",\"doi\":\"10.37878/2708-0080/2024-1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the effectiveness of the Martos method and the statistical method for predicting oil recovery factor using the example of the X field. Today's values of oil recovery factors (ORF) for Triassic horizons were determined taking into account the active water pressure regime with artificial maintenance of reservoir pressure (RPM) and the drilling of 16 new production wells. This approach required a revision of ORF values due to the transition to natural reservoir development and the cessation of maintaining reservoir pressure by water injection. The failure to drill new wells has also had a significant impact on ORF. At current production, when 44.7% of the field's reserves have been extracted, and taking into account the remaining reserves, the development period of the field will not exceed 42 years. It is also planned to increase the number of hydraulic engineering measures to expand drainage zones and involve additional reserves in development. Having compared the two methods for calculating ORF, we can conclude that although V.N. Martos’ method is based on reservoir parameters, and the statistical method uses historical data, the results of their calculations differ slightly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neft i gaz\",\"volume\":\"158 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neft i gaz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37878/2708-0080/2024-1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neft i gaz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37878/2708-0080/2024-1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章以 X 油田为例,讨论了 Martos 方法和统计方法在预测采油系数方面的有效性。三叠系地层目前的采油系数(ORF)值是在考虑到人工维持储层压力(RPM)的活性水压制度和钻探 16 口新生产井的情况下确定的。这种方法需要对 ORF 值进行修订,因为油藏已过渡到自然开发,不再通过注水维持储层压力。未能钻探新井也对 ORF 产生了重大影响。按照目前的产量,油田已开采出 44.7%的储量,再考虑到剩余储量,油田的开发周期不会超过 42 年。此外,还计划增加水利工程措施的数量,以扩大排水区,并在开发中涉及更多储量。在比较了这两种计算 ORF 的方法之后,我们可以得出结论,虽然 V.N. Martos 的方法是基于储层参数,而统计方法使用的是历史数据,但两者的计算结果略有不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FORECASTING ORF BY THE MARTOS METHOD AND THE STATISTICAL METHOD USING THE EXAMPLE OF DEPOSIT X
The article discusses the effectiveness of the Martos method and the statistical method for predicting oil recovery factor using the example of the X field. Today's values of oil recovery factors (ORF) for Triassic horizons were determined taking into account the active water pressure regime with artificial maintenance of reservoir pressure (RPM) and the drilling of 16 new production wells. This approach required a revision of ORF values due to the transition to natural reservoir development and the cessation of maintaining reservoir pressure by water injection. The failure to drill new wells has also had a significant impact on ORF. At current production, when 44.7% of the field's reserves have been extracted, and taking into account the remaining reserves, the development period of the field will not exceed 42 years. It is also planned to increase the number of hydraulic engineering measures to expand drainage zones and involve additional reserves in development. Having compared the two methods for calculating ORF, we can conclude that although V.N. Martos’ method is based on reservoir parameters, and the statistical method uses historical data, the results of their calculations differ slightly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信