Katerina Karageorgou, Anna Madoglou, Dimitris Kalamaras
{"title":"探索不确定时期青年公民政治参与的情感、行为和认知维度","authors":"Katerina Karageorgou, Anna Madoglou, Dimitris Kalamaras","doi":"10.12681/psy_hps.33997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political engagement (PE) is approached as a complex concept that incorporates cognitive, behavioural, and emotional aspects. This study aims to investigate the suggested typology of PE (partisan, apartisan, stand-by, apolitical, antipolitical), and to identify those variables (cognitive, emotional, behavioural) that contribute to the appearance of each type. Surveys are conducted in the UK, France, and Greece, as these countries both represent and experience different types of crises. Participants (N=1.005), from 18 to 35 years old, were classified into the types according to their self-positioning on PE typology. Five models of logistic regression were applied to our samples. The five types of PE were used as the criterion variables, whereas the emotional (emotions towards politics: enthusiasm, anxiety, aversion, disgust, disappointment, indifference; emotions towards crisis: fear/frustration, trust/optimism, anger/indignation), the cognitive (political interest: interest in politics, interest in societal issues), and the behavioural dimensions (political participation: non-digital political activism, activities of socio-political concerns, digital political activism, normative collective action, active political counter-argumentation, and pro-social activism) as predictors. Results showed that different forms of political interest, different repertoires of political behaviours, and different sets of emotions contribute to the appearance of each type of PE. Furthermore, PE types are interpreted through the complexity of modern societies. Especially for apolitical and anti-political types of engagement, discussion suggests that they could be considered as forms of political identities in post-democratic societies of developing crises and uncertainty.\n ","PeriodicalId":123595,"journal":{"name":"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring emotional, behavioural, and cognitive dimensions of young citizens’ political engagement in uncertain times\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Karageorgou, Anna Madoglou, Dimitris Kalamaras\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/psy_hps.33997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political engagement (PE) is approached as a complex concept that incorporates cognitive, behavioural, and emotional aspects. This study aims to investigate the suggested typology of PE (partisan, apartisan, stand-by, apolitical, antipolitical), and to identify those variables (cognitive, emotional, behavioural) that contribute to the appearance of each type. Surveys are conducted in the UK, France, and Greece, as these countries both represent and experience different types of crises. Participants (N=1.005), from 18 to 35 years old, were classified into the types according to their self-positioning on PE typology. Five models of logistic regression were applied to our samples. The five types of PE were used as the criterion variables, whereas the emotional (emotions towards politics: enthusiasm, anxiety, aversion, disgust, disappointment, indifference; emotions towards crisis: fear/frustration, trust/optimism, anger/indignation), the cognitive (political interest: interest in politics, interest in societal issues), and the behavioural dimensions (political participation: non-digital political activism, activities of socio-political concerns, digital political activism, normative collective action, active political counter-argumentation, and pro-social activism) as predictors. Results showed that different forms of political interest, different repertoires of political behaviours, and different sets of emotions contribute to the appearance of each type of PE. Furthermore, PE types are interpreted through the complexity of modern societies. Especially for apolitical and anti-political types of engagement, discussion suggests that they could be considered as forms of political identities in post-democratic societies of developing crises and uncertainty.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":123595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.33997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.33997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
政治参与(PE)是一个复杂的概念,包含认知、行为和情感三个方面。本研究旨在调查所建议的政治参与类型(党派、非党派、袖手旁观、非政治、反政治),并确定导致每种类型出现的变量(认知、情感、行为)。调查在英国、法国和希腊进行,因为这些国家都代表和经历了不同类型的危机。参与者(N=1.005)年龄在 18 至 35 岁之间,根据他们在 PE 类型学中的自我定位被划分为不同类型。我们对样本采用了五个逻辑回归模型。政治兴趣:对政治的兴趣、对社会问题的兴趣)和行为维度(政治参与:非数字政治活动、社会政治关注活动、数字政治活动、规范性集体行动、积极的政治反驳和亲社会活动)作为预测因素。研究结果表明,不同形式的政治兴趣、不同的政治行为方式和不同的情感因素会导致每种 PE 的出现。此外,PE 类型是通过现代社会的复杂性来解释的。特别是对于非政治和反政治参与类型,讨论表明,在危机和不确定性不断发展的后民主社会中,它们可被视为政治身份的形式。
Exploring emotional, behavioural, and cognitive dimensions of young citizens’ political engagement in uncertain times
Political engagement (PE) is approached as a complex concept that incorporates cognitive, behavioural, and emotional aspects. This study aims to investigate the suggested typology of PE (partisan, apartisan, stand-by, apolitical, antipolitical), and to identify those variables (cognitive, emotional, behavioural) that contribute to the appearance of each type. Surveys are conducted in the UK, France, and Greece, as these countries both represent and experience different types of crises. Participants (N=1.005), from 18 to 35 years old, were classified into the types according to their self-positioning on PE typology. Five models of logistic regression were applied to our samples. The five types of PE were used as the criterion variables, whereas the emotional (emotions towards politics: enthusiasm, anxiety, aversion, disgust, disappointment, indifference; emotions towards crisis: fear/frustration, trust/optimism, anger/indignation), the cognitive (political interest: interest in politics, interest in societal issues), and the behavioural dimensions (political participation: non-digital political activism, activities of socio-political concerns, digital political activism, normative collective action, active political counter-argumentation, and pro-social activism) as predictors. Results showed that different forms of political interest, different repertoires of political behaviours, and different sets of emotions contribute to the appearance of each type of PE. Furthermore, PE types are interpreted through the complexity of modern societies. Especially for apolitical and anti-political types of engagement, discussion suggests that they could be considered as forms of political identities in post-democratic societies of developing crises and uncertainty.