农民代理与社区互助:资本和市场支配的替代方案

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Zhanshuo Li
{"title":"农民代理与社区互助:资本和市场支配的替代方案","authors":"Zhanshuo Li","doi":"10.1163/22136746-12341310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFormalist legal and economic theories axiomatically assume the “rational economic man” and the “inevitable optimal resource allocation by perfectly competitive markets,” thereby justifying the ownership of corporate entities by the holders of capital assets. Professional cooperatives, guided by this formalist logic, predominantly serve the interests of capitalized large-scale peasants. In contrast, the organizational practices from mutual aid to comprehensive cooperation during the Chinese revolutionary period reveal an alternative possibility diverging from formalist logic. This alternative centers on community-based rationality of small-scale peasant households, promoting agricultural development by enhancing resource use efficiency through community mutual aid among smallholders to meet their collective production and living needs. This substantivist logic, grounded in mutual aid practices, can also provide direction for integrating small-scale peasant households into large markets in the contemporary context.","PeriodicalId":37171,"journal":{"name":"Rural China","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peasant Agency and Community Mutual Aid: An Alternative to Capital and Market Dominance\",\"authors\":\"Zhanshuo Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22136746-12341310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nFormalist legal and economic theories axiomatically assume the “rational economic man” and the “inevitable optimal resource allocation by perfectly competitive markets,” thereby justifying the ownership of corporate entities by the holders of capital assets. Professional cooperatives, guided by this formalist logic, predominantly serve the interests of capitalized large-scale peasants. In contrast, the organizational practices from mutual aid to comprehensive cooperation during the Chinese revolutionary period reveal an alternative possibility diverging from formalist logic. This alternative centers on community-based rationality of small-scale peasant households, promoting agricultural development by enhancing resource use efficiency through community mutual aid among smallholders to meet their collective production and living needs. This substantivist logic, grounded in mutual aid practices, can also provide direction for integrating small-scale peasant households into large markets in the contemporary context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural China\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-12341310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-12341310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形式主义的法律和经济理论公理化地假定 "理性经济人 "和 "完全竞争市场不可避免的最优资源配置",从而为资本资产持有人拥有公司实体提供了理由。在这种形式主义逻辑的指导下,专业合作社主要服务于资本化的大规模农民的利益。与此相反,中国革命时期从互助到全面合作的组织实践,揭示了与形式主义逻辑不同的另一种可能性。这种选择以小农家庭的社区理性为核心,通过小农之间的社区互助,提高资源利用效率,满足集体的生产和生活需求,从而促进农业发展。这种以互助实践为基础的实证主义逻辑也可以为当代小规模农户融入大市场提供方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peasant Agency and Community Mutual Aid: An Alternative to Capital and Market Dominance
Formalist legal and economic theories axiomatically assume the “rational economic man” and the “inevitable optimal resource allocation by perfectly competitive markets,” thereby justifying the ownership of corporate entities by the holders of capital assets. Professional cooperatives, guided by this formalist logic, predominantly serve the interests of capitalized large-scale peasants. In contrast, the organizational practices from mutual aid to comprehensive cooperation during the Chinese revolutionary period reveal an alternative possibility diverging from formalist logic. This alternative centers on community-based rationality of small-scale peasant households, promoting agricultural development by enhancing resource use efficiency through community mutual aid among smallholders to meet their collective production and living needs. This substantivist logic, grounded in mutual aid practices, can also provide direction for integrating small-scale peasant households into large markets in the contemporary context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural China
Rural China Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信