语言学证据引用中的法拉比文献主题与语法学方法论的比较:以西巴威的著作为例

Mahmoud Abdeldeen
{"title":"语言学证据引用中的法拉比文献主题与语法学方法论的比较:以西巴威的著作为例","authors":"Mahmoud Abdeldeen","doi":"10.59992/ijsr.2024.v3n2p6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to explore how closely grammarians adhered to the standards set by Abu Nasr al-Farabi in his book \"Al-Huruf,\" known as Al-Farabi's Document. These standards outlined the methodology grammarians used in citing Arabic speech to validate their linguistic opinions or grammatical rules. It was expected that Al-Farabi derived these criteria based on the grammarians' methodology in their writings, but this did not entirely match what was observed in grammatical texts. Al-Farabi noted that grammarians did not cite everything from the Arabs; they excluded tribes influenced by other languages, known as the geographical criterion for linguistic evidence. However, the reality shows that grammarians did not strictly follow this criterion. This was evident in the examples cited by Sibawayh in his book, as many poets fell outside Al-Farabi's mentioned scope. This does not indicate a lack of methodology, but rather Sibawayh and subsequent grammarians focused on eloquence and linguistic correctness. Wherever these were present, evidence was cited regardless of the geographical criterion of the speaker. Al-Farabi's description of the grammarians' method seems to be a general overview rather than an accurate extrapolation. Al-Farabi's Document in \"Al-Huruf\" is more precise to what grammarians did, but less accurate in its content attributed to him by Abu Hayyan and Al-Suyuti, possibly due to their added details to the document's text.","PeriodicalId":513336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Scientific Research","volume":"48 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Themes of Al-Farabi's Document in Linguistic Evidence Citation Compared to the Methodology of Grammarians: Sibawayh's Book as a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Abdeldeen\",\"doi\":\"10.59992/ijsr.2024.v3n2p6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to explore how closely grammarians adhered to the standards set by Abu Nasr al-Farabi in his book \\\"Al-Huruf,\\\" known as Al-Farabi's Document. These standards outlined the methodology grammarians used in citing Arabic speech to validate their linguistic opinions or grammatical rules. It was expected that Al-Farabi derived these criteria based on the grammarians' methodology in their writings, but this did not entirely match what was observed in grammatical texts. Al-Farabi noted that grammarians did not cite everything from the Arabs; they excluded tribes influenced by other languages, known as the geographical criterion for linguistic evidence. However, the reality shows that grammarians did not strictly follow this criterion. This was evident in the examples cited by Sibawayh in his book, as many poets fell outside Al-Farabi's mentioned scope. This does not indicate a lack of methodology, but rather Sibawayh and subsequent grammarians focused on eloquence and linguistic correctness. Wherever these were present, evidence was cited regardless of the geographical criterion of the speaker. Al-Farabi's description of the grammarians' method seems to be a general overview rather than an accurate extrapolation. Al-Farabi's Document in \\\"Al-Huruf\\\" is more precise to what grammarians did, but less accurate in its content attributed to him by Abu Hayyan and Al-Suyuti, possibly due to their added details to the document's text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Scientific Research\",\"volume\":\"48 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Scientific Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59992/ijsr.2024.v3n2p6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59992/ijsr.2024.v3n2p6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在探讨语法学家如何严格遵守阿布-纳赛尔-法拉比在其著作《Al-Huruf》(又称《法拉比文件》)中制定的标准。这些标准概述了语法学家在引用阿拉伯语言以验证其语言观点或语法规则时所使用的方法。按理说,Al-Farabi 是根据语法学家的著作中的方法论得出这些标准的,但这与语法文本中的内容并不完全一致。Al-Farabi 指出,语法学家并没有引用阿拉伯人的一切;他们排除了受其他语言影响的部落,这被称为语言证据的地理标准。然而,实际情况表明,语法学家并没有严格遵守这一标准。这一点在 Sibawayh 在其书中引用的例子中显而易见,因为许多诗人都不在 Al-Farabi 所提及的范围内。这并不表明他们缺乏方法论,而是 Sibawayh 及其后的语法学家将重点放在了口才和语言的正确性上。只要这些因素存在,无论说话者的地理标准如何,都会被引用为证据。阿尔-法拉比对语法学家的方法的描述似乎是一种概括,而不是准确的推断。Al-Farabi 在 "Al-Huruf "中的文件对语法学家所做工作的描述更为精确,但 Abu Hayyan 和 Al-Suyuti 归因于他的内容却不那么准确,这可能是由于他们在文件文本中增加了细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Themes of Al-Farabi's Document in Linguistic Evidence Citation Compared to the Methodology of Grammarians: Sibawayh's Book as a Case Study
The study aimed to explore how closely grammarians adhered to the standards set by Abu Nasr al-Farabi in his book "Al-Huruf," known as Al-Farabi's Document. These standards outlined the methodology grammarians used in citing Arabic speech to validate their linguistic opinions or grammatical rules. It was expected that Al-Farabi derived these criteria based on the grammarians' methodology in their writings, but this did not entirely match what was observed in grammatical texts. Al-Farabi noted that grammarians did not cite everything from the Arabs; they excluded tribes influenced by other languages, known as the geographical criterion for linguistic evidence. However, the reality shows that grammarians did not strictly follow this criterion. This was evident in the examples cited by Sibawayh in his book, as many poets fell outside Al-Farabi's mentioned scope. This does not indicate a lack of methodology, but rather Sibawayh and subsequent grammarians focused on eloquence and linguistic correctness. Wherever these were present, evidence was cited regardless of the geographical criterion of the speaker. Al-Farabi's description of the grammarians' method seems to be a general overview rather than an accurate extrapolation. Al-Farabi's Document in "Al-Huruf" is more precise to what grammarians did, but less accurate in its content attributed to him by Abu Hayyan and Al-Suyuti, possibly due to their added details to the document's text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信