β阻断药物在心血管治疗中的差异。

Annals of clinical research Pub Date : 1988-01-01
E Iisalo, J Heikkilä
{"title":"β阻断药物在心血管治疗中的差异。","authors":"E Iisalo,&nbsp;J Heikkilä","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinically significant differences between various beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs exist. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and exertional angina pectoris benefit from all types of beta-blockers. Drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic action (ISA) given intravenously may be safer in some patients with acute myocardial infarction than those drugs without ISA. In cardiac patients at rest they may have a vasodilator action and cause less myocardial depression than beta-blockers without ISA. When, however, the cardiac sympathetic tone is high pindolol and other beta-blockers with ISA act as any other beta-blockers, producing haemodynamic impairment. Studies have shown that beta-blockers with ISA confer less benefit in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction and they are not suitable for the treatment of obstructive cardiomyopathy. Non-selective beta-blockers may be advantageous in hypokalaemic arrhythmias. Beta 1-blockers may be preferred for patients with bronchoconstriction, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and, theoretically to some extent in theory also in patients with hypertension. The extent and nature of side effects may also influence the selection of the most suitable beta-blocker in cardiovascular therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8084,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in betablocking drugs in cardiovascular therapy.\",\"authors\":\"E Iisalo,&nbsp;J Heikkilä\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinically significant differences between various beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs exist. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and exertional angina pectoris benefit from all types of beta-blockers. Drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic action (ISA) given intravenously may be safer in some patients with acute myocardial infarction than those drugs without ISA. In cardiac patients at rest they may have a vasodilator action and cause less myocardial depression than beta-blockers without ISA. When, however, the cardiac sympathetic tone is high pindolol and other beta-blockers with ISA act as any other beta-blockers, producing haemodynamic impairment. Studies have shown that beta-blockers with ISA confer less benefit in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction and they are not suitable for the treatment of obstructive cardiomyopathy. Non-selective beta-blockers may be advantageous in hypokalaemic arrhythmias. Beta 1-blockers may be preferred for patients with bronchoconstriction, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and, theoretically to some extent in theory also in patients with hypertension. The extent and nature of side effects may also influence the selection of the most suitable beta-blocker in cardiovascular therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of clinical research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种β -肾上腺素能受体阻断药物在临床上存在显著差异。缺血性心脏病和运动性心绞痛患者受益于所有类型的-受体阻滞剂。某些急性心肌梗死患者静脉给予具有内在拟交感神经作用(ISA)的药物可能比那些没有ISA的药物更安全。在心脏病人休息时,它们可能有血管舒张作用,引起的心肌抑制比没有ISA的-受体阻滞剂少。然而,当心脏交感神经张力高时,其他具有ISA的β受体阻滞剂与其他β受体阻滞剂一样起作用,产生血流动力学损伤。研究表明,含有ISA的-受体阻滞剂在心肌梗死后的二级预防中获益较少,不适合治疗阻塞性心肌病。非选择性受体阻滞剂可能有利于低钾血症性心律失常。β - 1受体阻滞剂可能优先用于支气管收缩、糖尿病、周围血管疾病患者,理论上在一定程度上也适用于高血压患者。副作用的程度和性质也可能影响在心血管治疗中选择最合适的-受体阻滞剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in betablocking drugs in cardiovascular therapy.

Clinically significant differences between various beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs exist. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and exertional angina pectoris benefit from all types of beta-blockers. Drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic action (ISA) given intravenously may be safer in some patients with acute myocardial infarction than those drugs without ISA. In cardiac patients at rest they may have a vasodilator action and cause less myocardial depression than beta-blockers without ISA. When, however, the cardiac sympathetic tone is high pindolol and other beta-blockers with ISA act as any other beta-blockers, producing haemodynamic impairment. Studies have shown that beta-blockers with ISA confer less benefit in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction and they are not suitable for the treatment of obstructive cardiomyopathy. Non-selective beta-blockers may be advantageous in hypokalaemic arrhythmias. Beta 1-blockers may be preferred for patients with bronchoconstriction, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and, theoretically to some extent in theory also in patients with hypertension. The extent and nature of side effects may also influence the selection of the most suitable beta-blocker in cardiovascular therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信