为什么 GFS 没有预测到台风 IN-FA(2021 年)在台湾岛以东减弱?

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jia-yi Liang, Liguang Wu, Chunyi Xiang, Qingyuan Liu
{"title":"为什么 GFS 没有预测到台风 IN-FA(2021 年)在台湾岛以东减弱?","authors":"Jia-yi Liang, Liguang Wu, Chunyi Xiang, Qingyuan Liu","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0262.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTyphoon IN-FA (2021) experienced a weakening process on July 22–23 in a large-scale environment favorable for tropical cyclone (TC) intensification. All operational forecasts and the Global Forecast System (GFS) forecasts predicted a continuous intensification, which deviated significantly from the observation. The analysis of the GFS analysis product shows a coalescence process of Typhoon IN-FA with an intraseasonal monsoon gyre during the period, resulting in an increased outer size of IN-FA and well-organized convection to the east, which prevented transporting the mass and moisture into the inner-core area of IN-FA, thus leading to the weakening. Nevertheless, this essential coalescence process was not captured in the GFS forecasts due to the poor prediction of the monsoon gyre. The analysis shows that the forecasted monsoon gyre on July 20–22 had an eastward location at 72 h and 96 h lead times and a weaker intensity and outer circulation at 24 h and 48 h lead times, leading to the forecasted TC always moving in its north and west, in agreement with numerical simulation results that the monsoon gyre with a weaker outer circulation is not conducive to the coalescence. Thus, the deep convection to the east of IN-FA preventing the inward transportation of mass and moisture did not develop in the GFS forecasts. As a result, the GFS forecasted that IN-FA would continue intensifying in a favorable environment on July 22–23. The findings of this study would prompt forecasters to pay attention to the prediction of the monsoon gyre and its influence on the TC intensity in forecast products available to them.","PeriodicalId":18824,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Weather Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why was the weakening of Typhoon IN-FA (2021) to the east of Taiwan Island not forecasted in the GFS?\",\"authors\":\"Jia-yi Liang, Liguang Wu, Chunyi Xiang, Qingyuan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0262.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nTyphoon IN-FA (2021) experienced a weakening process on July 22–23 in a large-scale environment favorable for tropical cyclone (TC) intensification. All operational forecasts and the Global Forecast System (GFS) forecasts predicted a continuous intensification, which deviated significantly from the observation. The analysis of the GFS analysis product shows a coalescence process of Typhoon IN-FA with an intraseasonal monsoon gyre during the period, resulting in an increased outer size of IN-FA and well-organized convection to the east, which prevented transporting the mass and moisture into the inner-core area of IN-FA, thus leading to the weakening. Nevertheless, this essential coalescence process was not captured in the GFS forecasts due to the poor prediction of the monsoon gyre. The analysis shows that the forecasted monsoon gyre on July 20–22 had an eastward location at 72 h and 96 h lead times and a weaker intensity and outer circulation at 24 h and 48 h lead times, leading to the forecasted TC always moving in its north and west, in agreement with numerical simulation results that the monsoon gyre with a weaker outer circulation is not conducive to the coalescence. Thus, the deep convection to the east of IN-FA preventing the inward transportation of mass and moisture did not develop in the GFS forecasts. As a result, the GFS forecasted that IN-FA would continue intensifying in a favorable environment on July 22–23. The findings of this study would prompt forecasters to pay attention to the prediction of the monsoon gyre and its influence on the TC intensity in forecast products available to them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0262.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Weather Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0262.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

台风 IN-FA(2021 年)于 7 月 22 日至 23 日在有利于热带气旋(TC)加强的大尺度环境中经历了减弱过程。所有业务预报和全球预报系统(GFS)预报都预测台风会持续加强,但与观测结果有很大偏差。GFS 的分析结果显示,台风 IN-FA 在此期间与季内季风涡旋发生了一个凝聚过程,导致 IN-FA 的外围体积增大,东面的对流组织良好,无法将质量和水汽输送到 IN-FA 的内核区域,从而导致强度减弱。然而,由于对季风回旋的预测不准确,GFS预报没有捕捉到这一重要的凝聚过程。分析表明,7月20-22日预报的季风回旋在72 h和96 h前置时间位置偏东,在24 h和48 h前置时间强度和外围环流较弱,导致预报的TC始终向其北部和西部移动,这与数值模拟结果一致,即外围环流较弱的季风回旋不利于凝聚。因此,在 GFS 的预报中,IN-FA 以东阻碍气团和水汽向内输送的深层对流并没有形成。因此,GFS 预测 IN-FA 将在 7 月 22-23 日的有利环境中继续加强。这项研究的结果将促使预报员在现有的预报产品中注意季风涡旋的预测及其对热带气旋强度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why was the weakening of Typhoon IN-FA (2021) to the east of Taiwan Island not forecasted in the GFS?
Typhoon IN-FA (2021) experienced a weakening process on July 22–23 in a large-scale environment favorable for tropical cyclone (TC) intensification. All operational forecasts and the Global Forecast System (GFS) forecasts predicted a continuous intensification, which deviated significantly from the observation. The analysis of the GFS analysis product shows a coalescence process of Typhoon IN-FA with an intraseasonal monsoon gyre during the period, resulting in an increased outer size of IN-FA and well-organized convection to the east, which prevented transporting the mass and moisture into the inner-core area of IN-FA, thus leading to the weakening. Nevertheless, this essential coalescence process was not captured in the GFS forecasts due to the poor prediction of the monsoon gyre. The analysis shows that the forecasted monsoon gyre on July 20–22 had an eastward location at 72 h and 96 h lead times and a weaker intensity and outer circulation at 24 h and 48 h lead times, leading to the forecasted TC always moving in its north and west, in agreement with numerical simulation results that the monsoon gyre with a weaker outer circulation is not conducive to the coalescence. Thus, the deep convection to the east of IN-FA preventing the inward transportation of mass and moisture did not develop in the GFS forecasts. As a result, the GFS forecasted that IN-FA would continue intensifying in a favorable environment on July 22–23. The findings of this study would prompt forecasters to pay attention to the prediction of the monsoon gyre and its influence on the TC intensity in forecast products available to them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Monthly Weather Review (MWR) (ISSN: 0027-0644; eISSN: 1520-0493) publishes research relevant to the analysis and prediction of observed atmospheric circulations and physics, including technique development, data assimilation, model validation, and relevant case studies. This research includes numerical and data assimilation techniques that apply to the atmosphere and/or ocean environments. MWR also addresses phenomena having seasonal and subseasonal time scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信