绿色创业导向与绿色技术创新:资源协调能力是否重要?

Ibraheem Saleh Al koliby, M. A. Al‐Hakimi, Mohammed Abdulrahman Kaid Zaid, Mohammed Farooque Khan, M. Hasan, M. A. Alshadadi
{"title":"绿色创业导向与绿色技术创新:资源协调能力是否重要?","authors":"Ibraheem Saleh Al koliby, M. A. Al‐Hakimi, Mohammed Abdulrahman Kaid Zaid, Mohammed Farooque Khan, M. Hasan, M. A. Alshadadi","doi":"10.1108/bl-06-2023-0199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAlthough green entrepreneurial orientation (GEO) has received much attention, it is unclear whether it affects technological green innovation (GI). Therefore, this study aims to understand how GEO affects technological GI, with its dimensions green product innovation (GPRODI) and green process innovation (GPROCI), as well as to explore whether resource orchestration capability (ROC) moderates the relationships between them.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on a cross-sectional survey design, data were gathered from 177 managers of large manufacturing firms in Yemen and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling via SmartPLS software.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results revealed that GEO positively affects both GPRODI and GPROCI, with a higher effect on GPROCI. Importantly, ROC does, in fact, positively moderate the link between GEO and GPRODI.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research adds to knowledge by combining GEO, ROC and technological GI into a unified framework, considering the perspectives of the resource-based view and the resource orchestration theory. However, the study’s use of cross-sectional survey data makes it impossible to infer causes. This is because GEO, ROC and technological GI all have effects on time that this empirical framework cannot account for.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings from this research provide valuable insights for executives and decision makers of large manufacturing companies, who are expected to show increasing interest in adopting ROC into their organisations. This suggests that environmentally-conscious entrepreneurial firms can enhance their GI efforts by embracing ROC.\n\n\nSocial implications\nBy adopting the proposed framework, firms can carry out their activities in ways that do not harm environmental and societal well-being, as simply achieving high economic performance is no longer sufficient.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTheoretically, the results offer an in-depth understanding of the role of GEO in the technological GI domain by indicating that GEO can promote GPRODI and GPROCI. In addition, the results shed new light on the boundaries of GEO from the perspective of resource orchestration theory. Furthermore, the findings present important insights for managers aiming to enhance their comprehension of leveraging GEO and ROC to foster technological GI.\n","PeriodicalId":293295,"journal":{"name":"The Bottom Line","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?\",\"authors\":\"Ibraheem Saleh Al koliby, M. A. Al‐Hakimi, Mohammed Abdulrahman Kaid Zaid, Mohammed Farooque Khan, M. Hasan, M. A. Alshadadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bl-06-2023-0199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nAlthough green entrepreneurial orientation (GEO) has received much attention, it is unclear whether it affects technological green innovation (GI). Therefore, this study aims to understand how GEO affects technological GI, with its dimensions green product innovation (GPRODI) and green process innovation (GPROCI), as well as to explore whether resource orchestration capability (ROC) moderates the relationships between them.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nBased on a cross-sectional survey design, data were gathered from 177 managers of large manufacturing firms in Yemen and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling via SmartPLS software.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results revealed that GEO positively affects both GPRODI and GPROCI, with a higher effect on GPROCI. Importantly, ROC does, in fact, positively moderate the link between GEO and GPRODI.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis research adds to knowledge by combining GEO, ROC and technological GI into a unified framework, considering the perspectives of the resource-based view and the resource orchestration theory. However, the study’s use of cross-sectional survey data makes it impossible to infer causes. This is because GEO, ROC and technological GI all have effects on time that this empirical framework cannot account for.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings from this research provide valuable insights for executives and decision makers of large manufacturing companies, who are expected to show increasing interest in adopting ROC into their organisations. This suggests that environmentally-conscious entrepreneurial firms can enhance their GI efforts by embracing ROC.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nBy adopting the proposed framework, firms can carry out their activities in ways that do not harm environmental and societal well-being, as simply achieving high economic performance is no longer sufficient.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTheoretically, the results offer an in-depth understanding of the role of GEO in the technological GI domain by indicating that GEO can promote GPRODI and GPROCI. In addition, the results shed new light on the boundaries of GEO from the perspective of resource orchestration theory. Furthermore, the findings present important insights for managers aiming to enhance their comprehension of leveraging GEO and ROC to foster technological GI.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":293295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bottom Line\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bottom Line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-06-2023-0199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-06-2023-0199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 虽然绿色创业导向(GEO)已受到广泛关注,但它是否会影响技术绿色创新(GI)尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在了解 GEO 如何影响技术绿色创新,包括绿色产品创新(GPRODI)和绿色流程创新(GPROCI)两个维度,并探讨资源协调能力(ROC)是否调节了它们之间的关系。设计/方法/途径基于横截面调查设计,从也门大型制造企业的 177 名经理处收集数据,并通过 SmartPLS 软件使用偏最小二乘法结构方程模型进行分析。重要的是,ROC 事实上正向调节了 GEO 和 GPRODI 之间的联系。研究局限/意义本研究将 GEO、ROC 和技术 GI 结合到一个统一的框架中,从基于资源的观点和资源协调理论的角度进行考虑,从而增加了知识。然而,由于本研究使用的是横截面调查数据,因此无法推断原因。实践意义本研究的发现为大型制造企业的高管和决策者提供了宝贵的见解,预计这些企业对在其组织中采用 ROC 会表现出越来越大的兴趣。社会意义通过采用所提出的框架,企业可以以不损害环境和社会福祉的方式开展活动,因为仅仅实现高经济绩效已不再足够。原创性/价值从理论上讲,研究结果表明,全球环境展望可以促进 GPRODI 和 GPROCI,从而深入理解了全球环境展望在技术全球创新领域的作用。此外,研究结果还从资源协调理论的角度为 GEO 的边界提供了新的启示。此外,研究结果还为管理者提供了重要启示,帮助他们更好地理解如何利用 GEO 和 ROC 来促进技术 GI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?
Purpose Although green entrepreneurial orientation (GEO) has received much attention, it is unclear whether it affects technological green innovation (GI). Therefore, this study aims to understand how GEO affects technological GI, with its dimensions green product innovation (GPRODI) and green process innovation (GPROCI), as well as to explore whether resource orchestration capability (ROC) moderates the relationships between them. Design/methodology/approach Based on a cross-sectional survey design, data were gathered from 177 managers of large manufacturing firms in Yemen and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling via SmartPLS software. Findings The results revealed that GEO positively affects both GPRODI and GPROCI, with a higher effect on GPROCI. Importantly, ROC does, in fact, positively moderate the link between GEO and GPRODI. Research limitations/implications This research adds to knowledge by combining GEO, ROC and technological GI into a unified framework, considering the perspectives of the resource-based view and the resource orchestration theory. However, the study’s use of cross-sectional survey data makes it impossible to infer causes. This is because GEO, ROC and technological GI all have effects on time that this empirical framework cannot account for. Practical implications The findings from this research provide valuable insights for executives and decision makers of large manufacturing companies, who are expected to show increasing interest in adopting ROC into their organisations. This suggests that environmentally-conscious entrepreneurial firms can enhance their GI efforts by embracing ROC. Social implications By adopting the proposed framework, firms can carry out their activities in ways that do not harm environmental and societal well-being, as simply achieving high economic performance is no longer sufficient. Originality/value Theoretically, the results offer an in-depth understanding of the role of GEO in the technological GI domain by indicating that GEO can promote GPRODI and GPROCI. In addition, the results shed new light on the boundaries of GEO from the perspective of resource orchestration theory. Furthermore, the findings present important insights for managers aiming to enhance their comprehension of leveraging GEO and ROC to foster technological GI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信