在初级保健中管理慢性阻塞性肺病:肺康复的影响

Guilherme Oliveira, Rita Félix, Pedro Ruivo dos Santos, Luís Monteiro, Cristina Tejo
{"title":"在初级保健中管理慢性阻塞性肺病:肺康复的影响","authors":"Guilherme Oliveira, Rita Félix, Pedro Ruivo dos Santos, Luís Monteiro, Cristina Tejo","doi":"10.32385/rpmgf.v40i1.13749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, and its management involves improving quality of life, delaying progression, and minimizing exacerbations. The benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD has been documented in the literature. This intervention can be applied to a primary healthcare setting, using community resources. Objectives: This systematic review sought to compile current evidence implying the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting on the quality of life of patients with COPD. Methods: Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. We included community-based pulmonary rehabilitation and excluded interventions in a hospital setting. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life; secondary outcomes were functional exercise capacity and mortality. Data extraction and triage were performed independently by three authors, and bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: Four studies met the search criteria. Three studies reported benefits in at least one of the outcomes; a fourth reported no differences between groups. Rehabilitation frequency and duration seemed to have some impact on all outcomes. Mortality was higher in the control groups when available. The included studies had important limitations, namely the inability to blind interventions. Conclusions: Pulmonary rehabilitation in a primary health care setting benefits the quality of life and functional exercise capacity in COPD patients. Optimal treatment modality, frequency, and duration are yet to be defined and are perhaps reliant on individual patient attributes. Though unable to add to previous findings, we hope this review fosters interest in this potentially life-changing intervention in a primary healthcare context.","PeriodicalId":286133,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral","volume":"331 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary health care: the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Oliveira, Rita Félix, Pedro Ruivo dos Santos, Luís Monteiro, Cristina Tejo\",\"doi\":\"10.32385/rpmgf.v40i1.13749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, and its management involves improving quality of life, delaying progression, and minimizing exacerbations. The benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD has been documented in the literature. This intervention can be applied to a primary healthcare setting, using community resources. Objectives: This systematic review sought to compile current evidence implying the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting on the quality of life of patients with COPD. Methods: Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. We included community-based pulmonary rehabilitation and excluded interventions in a hospital setting. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life; secondary outcomes were functional exercise capacity and mortality. Data extraction and triage were performed independently by three authors, and bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: Four studies met the search criteria. Three studies reported benefits in at least one of the outcomes; a fourth reported no differences between groups. Rehabilitation frequency and duration seemed to have some impact on all outcomes. Mortality was higher in the control groups when available. The included studies had important limitations, namely the inability to blind interventions. Conclusions: Pulmonary rehabilitation in a primary health care setting benefits the quality of life and functional exercise capacity in COPD patients. Optimal treatment modality, frequency, and duration are yet to be defined and are perhaps reliant on individual patient attributes. Though unable to add to previous findings, we hope this review fosters interest in this potentially life-changing intervention in a primary healthcare context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral\",\"volume\":\"331 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i1.13749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i1.13749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全球第三大死亡原因,其治疗包括改善生活质量、延缓病情恶化和减少恶化。文献记载了肺康复治疗 COPD 的益处。利用社区资源,这一干预措施可应用于初级医疗保健环境。目标:本系统性综述旨在汇集目前的证据,说明在初级医疗保健环境中进行肺康复治疗对慢性阻塞性肺病患者生活质量的影响。方法:检索了三个数据库:我们在三个数据库中搜索了随机对照试验。我们将社区肺康复纳入其中,但不包括医院环境中的干预措施。主要结果是与健康相关的生活质量;次要结果是功能锻炼能力和死亡率。数据提取和分流由三位作者独立完成,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对偏倚进行了评估。结果四项研究符合检索标准。三项研究报告了至少一项结果的益处;第四项研究报告了组间无差异。康复训练的频率和持续时间似乎对所有结果都有一定影响。对照组的死亡率较高。所纳入的研究存在一些重要的局限性,即无法对干预措施进行盲法分析。结论在基层医疗机构进行肺康复治疗可提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的生活质量和功能锻炼能力。最佳的治疗方式、频率和持续时间尚有待确定,可能与患者的个体属性有关。虽然无法对之前的研究结果进行补充,但我们希望这篇综述能提高人们对这一可能改变基层医疗机构生活的干预措施的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary health care: the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, and its management involves improving quality of life, delaying progression, and minimizing exacerbations. The benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD has been documented in the literature. This intervention can be applied to a primary healthcare setting, using community resources. Objectives: This systematic review sought to compile current evidence implying the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting on the quality of life of patients with COPD. Methods: Three databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. We included community-based pulmonary rehabilitation and excluded interventions in a hospital setting. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life; secondary outcomes were functional exercise capacity and mortality. Data extraction and triage were performed independently by three authors, and bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: Four studies met the search criteria. Three studies reported benefits in at least one of the outcomes; a fourth reported no differences between groups. Rehabilitation frequency and duration seemed to have some impact on all outcomes. Mortality was higher in the control groups when available. The included studies had important limitations, namely the inability to blind interventions. Conclusions: Pulmonary rehabilitation in a primary health care setting benefits the quality of life and functional exercise capacity in COPD patients. Optimal treatment modality, frequency, and duration are yet to be defined and are perhaps reliant on individual patient attributes. Though unable to add to previous findings, we hope this review fosters interest in this potentially life-changing intervention in a primary healthcare context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信