古代造山带三维地质力学模型中大陆形状的影响:以原始落基山造山运动为例

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vincent S. Nowaczewski , Daniel M. Sturmer , Benjamin L. Vaughan
{"title":"古代造山带三维地质力学模型中大陆形状的影响:以原始落基山造山运动为例","authors":"Vincent S. Nowaczewski ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Sturmer ,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The orientations of ancient intra-cratonic uplifts are commonly used to interpret the boundary tectonism style along concealed, modified, or destroyed continental margins. An implicit assumption is that the tectonism-linked stress field strongly correlated with uplift orientations. However, among other uncertainties, the shape of a stressed domain likely has an influence upon the interior stress field. In many cases of pre-Cenozoic orogenesis, multiple feasible restorations of a continent margin exist. To explore the influence of continent margin position and shape on a hypothetical ancient continental stress field we developed a new 3D geomechanical finite element method (FEM) to evaluate scenarios for the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogen (ARMO). Tectonic scenarios were calculated across a range of domains constrained by geologic uncertainty in the pre-ARMO geometry of the continent. Uncertainty for continent geometry prior to the ARMO is estimated from several published palinspastic restorations. The results demonstrate that 10s–100s of km of uncertainty in margin position, as is the case of the ARMO, should not prevent the linkage of stress patterns to styles of boundary tectonism. This work shows it is plausible to simplify the analysis of the ARMO stress/strain field utilizing one continental geometry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124000671/pdfft?md5=459c2df73366e3b9030395db89a13f65&pid=1-s2.0-S0191814124000671-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of continental shape in 3D geomechanical models of ancient orogenic belts: An example from the Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny\",\"authors\":\"Vincent S. Nowaczewski ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Sturmer ,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Vaughan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The orientations of ancient intra-cratonic uplifts are commonly used to interpret the boundary tectonism style along concealed, modified, or destroyed continental margins. An implicit assumption is that the tectonism-linked stress field strongly correlated with uplift orientations. However, among other uncertainties, the shape of a stressed domain likely has an influence upon the interior stress field. In many cases of pre-Cenozoic orogenesis, multiple feasible restorations of a continent margin exist. To explore the influence of continent margin position and shape on a hypothetical ancient continental stress field we developed a new 3D geomechanical finite element method (FEM) to evaluate scenarios for the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogen (ARMO). Tectonic scenarios were calculated across a range of domains constrained by geologic uncertainty in the pre-ARMO geometry of the continent. Uncertainty for continent geometry prior to the ARMO is estimated from several published palinspastic restorations. The results demonstrate that 10s–100s of km of uncertainty in margin position, as is the case of the ARMO, should not prevent the linkage of stress patterns to styles of boundary tectonism. This work shows it is plausible to simplify the analysis of the ARMO stress/strain field utilizing one continental geometry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Geology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124000671/pdfft?md5=459c2df73366e3b9030395db89a13f65&pid=1-s2.0-S0191814124000671-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124000671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124000671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古克拉通内隆起的方向通常用于解释被掩盖、改变或破坏的大陆边缘的边界构造运动方式。一个隐含的假设是,与构造有关的应力场与隆起方向密切相关。然而,除其他不确定因素外,应力域的形状很可能对内部应力场产生影响。在许多前新生代造山运动的案例中,存在多种可行的大陆边缘复原方式。为了探索大陆边缘位置和形状对假设的古大陆应力场的影响,我们开发了一种新的三维地质力学有限元方法(FEM),以评估古生代晚期原落基山造山带(ARMO)的各种方案。在一系列领域内计算了构造方案,这些领域受到 ARMO 之前大陆几何形状的地质不确定性的制约。ARMO 之前大陆几何形状的不确定性是根据几种已发表的掌状复原估算的。结果表明,边缘位置 10s-100s km 的不确定性(如 ARMO 的情况)不应妨碍将应力模式与边界构造运动风格联系起来。这项研究表明,利用一个大陆几何图形简化对 ARMO 应力/应变场的分析是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of continental shape in 3D geomechanical models of ancient orogenic belts: An example from the Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogeny

The orientations of ancient intra-cratonic uplifts are commonly used to interpret the boundary tectonism style along concealed, modified, or destroyed continental margins. An implicit assumption is that the tectonism-linked stress field strongly correlated with uplift orientations. However, among other uncertainties, the shape of a stressed domain likely has an influence upon the interior stress field. In many cases of pre-Cenozoic orogenesis, multiple feasible restorations of a continent margin exist. To explore the influence of continent margin position and shape on a hypothetical ancient continental stress field we developed a new 3D geomechanical finite element method (FEM) to evaluate scenarios for the late Paleozoic Ancestral Rocky Mountain orogen (ARMO). Tectonic scenarios were calculated across a range of domains constrained by geologic uncertainty in the pre-ARMO geometry of the continent. Uncertainty for continent geometry prior to the ARMO is estimated from several published palinspastic restorations. The results demonstrate that 10s–100s of km of uncertainty in margin position, as is the case of the ARMO, should not prevent the linkage of stress patterns to styles of boundary tectonism. This work shows it is plausible to simplify the analysis of the ARMO stress/strain field utilizing one continental geometry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信