{"title":"群体与个人。两种截然相反的盟约观点的批判性注释和教训","authors":"P.l. Rouwendal","doi":"10.21827/tr.67.1.24-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within Reformed circles in the Netherlands the doctrine of the covenant is much debated. Different views about the number of covenants, the (un)conditional nature of the covenant, and who belong to the covenant of grace, have been fixed for decades. The disputants no longer attempt to influence, never mind convince each other. This article examines recent publications from opposite sides (Verbond en doop from the GGN and Woord houden from the GKN) and seeks to bring the different covenant views into conversation with each other, by critically discussing these views and testing them for their inner consistency. This essay seeks to give impetus to renewed reflection on Reformed covenant doctrine by articulating the differences and the elements of truth in both publications.","PeriodicalId":517853,"journal":{"name":"Theologia Reformata","volume":"12 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De gemeenschap en het individu. Kritische notities bij en lessen uit twee tegengestelde verbondsvisies\",\"authors\":\"P.l. Rouwendal\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/tr.67.1.24-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within Reformed circles in the Netherlands the doctrine of the covenant is much debated. Different views about the number of covenants, the (un)conditional nature of the covenant, and who belong to the covenant of grace, have been fixed for decades. The disputants no longer attempt to influence, never mind convince each other. This article examines recent publications from opposite sides (Verbond en doop from the GGN and Woord houden from the GKN) and seeks to bring the different covenant views into conversation with each other, by critically discussing these views and testing them for their inner consistency. This essay seeks to give impetus to renewed reflection on Reformed covenant doctrine by articulating the differences and the elements of truth in both publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theologia Reformata\",\"volume\":\"12 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theologia Reformata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.67.1.24-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theologia Reformata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.67.1.24-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在荷兰的改革宗圈子里,关于圣约的教义争论不休。关于盟约的数量、盟约的(无)条件性以及谁属于恩典之约的不同观点,几十年来一直固定不变。争论者不再试图影响对方,更不用说说服对方了。本文研究了对立双方最近的出版物(GGN 的《Verbond en doop》和 GKN 的《Woord houden》),试图通过批判性地讨论这些观点并检验其内在的一致性,使不同的盟约观点相互对话。本文试图通过阐明这两份出版物中的差异和真理要素,推动对改革宗圣约教义的重新思考。
De gemeenschap en het individu. Kritische notities bij en lessen uit twee tegengestelde verbondsvisies
Within Reformed circles in the Netherlands the doctrine of the covenant is much debated. Different views about the number of covenants, the (un)conditional nature of the covenant, and who belong to the covenant of grace, have been fixed for decades. The disputants no longer attempt to influence, never mind convince each other. This article examines recent publications from opposite sides (Verbond en doop from the GGN and Woord houden from the GKN) and seeks to bring the different covenant views into conversation with each other, by critically discussing these views and testing them for their inner consistency. This essay seeks to give impetus to renewed reflection on Reformed covenant doctrine by articulating the differences and the elements of truth in both publications.