根据英国皇家外科学院指南评估急诊普通外科(EGS)手术记录的标准

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
S. Zuberi, Yusuf Mustaq, Ali Ijaz, Samyukta Sundar, Zahra Mohamedali, Krashna Patel, J. Joseph, R. Gurprashad
{"title":"根据英国皇家外科学院指南评估急诊普通外科(EGS)手术记录的标准","authors":"S. Zuberi, Yusuf Mustaq, Ali Ijaz, Samyukta Sundar, Zahra Mohamedali, Krashna Patel, J. Joseph, R. Gurprashad","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Operation notes are important for care in surgical patients. The objectives of this study were to analyze the emergency general surgery (EGS) operation note documentation in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines and to assess the impact of creating awareness of the guidelines and effect of a new proforma.\n Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 50 EGS operation notes was conducted between December 2019 and March 2020 and compared to RCSEng guidelines. Education was delivered on the importance of documentation in accordance with RCSEng guidelines. A new electronic proforma was introduced. A further 50 EGS operation notes were analysed between August 2020 and December 2020.\n Results: One hundred operation notes were reviewed, and each given a score out of 19. Our interventions showed significant improvement to the average score (15.64 vs 17.96; p< 0.001). Within the second cycle, there was a statistically significance difference when comparing electronic to handwritten notes (18.55 vs 17.50; p= 0.001).\n Conclusion: Implementation of the new proforma showed improvement in operation note documentation when compared to the RCSEng standard. Therefore, this study emphasizes the need for surgeons to familiarize themselves with the current guidelines.","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the standard of emergency general surgical (EGS) operation notes in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines\",\"authors\":\"S. Zuberi, Yusuf Mustaq, Ali Ijaz, Samyukta Sundar, Zahra Mohamedali, Krashna Patel, J. Joseph, R. Gurprashad\",\"doi\":\"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Operation notes are important for care in surgical patients. The objectives of this study were to analyze the emergency general surgery (EGS) operation note documentation in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines and to assess the impact of creating awareness of the guidelines and effect of a new proforma.\\n Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 50 EGS operation notes was conducted between December 2019 and March 2020 and compared to RCSEng guidelines. Education was delivered on the importance of documentation in accordance with RCSEng guidelines. A new electronic proforma was introduced. A further 50 EGS operation notes were analysed between August 2020 and December 2020.\\n Results: One hundred operation notes were reviewed, and each given a score out of 19. Our interventions showed significant improvement to the average score (15.64 vs 17.96; p< 0.001). Within the second cycle, there was a statistically significance difference when comparing electronic to handwritten notes (18.55 vs 17.50; p= 0.001).\\n Conclusion: Implementation of the new proforma showed improvement in operation note documentation when compared to the RCSEng standard. Therefore, this study emphasizes the need for surgeons to familiarize themselves with the current guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手术记录对于手术患者的护理非常重要。本研究的目的是根据英国皇家外科学院(RCSEng)指南分析急诊普外科(EGS)手术记录,并评估建立指南意识的影响和新表格的效果。材料与方法:在 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 3 月期间,对 50 例 EGS 手术记录进行了回顾性审查,并与 RCSEng 指南进行了比较。根据 RCSEng 指南开展了关于文档重要性的教育。引入了新的电子表格。2020 年 8 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,对另外 50 份 EGS 操作说明进行了分析。结果:对 100 份手术记录进行了审查,每份手术记录的满分为 19 分。我们的干预措施明显提高了平均得分(15.64 vs 17.96;p< 0.001)。在第二个周期内,电子记录与手写记录相比,差异有统计学意义(18.55 vs 17.50;p= 0.001)。结论与 RCSEng 标准相比,新表格的实施表明手术记录有所改进。因此,本研究强调了外科医生熟悉现行指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the standard of emergency general surgical (EGS) operation notes in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines
Objective: Operation notes are important for care in surgical patients. The objectives of this study were to analyze the emergency general surgery (EGS) operation note documentation in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines and to assess the impact of creating awareness of the guidelines and effect of a new proforma. Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 50 EGS operation notes was conducted between December 2019 and March 2020 and compared to RCSEng guidelines. Education was delivered on the importance of documentation in accordance with RCSEng guidelines. A new electronic proforma was introduced. A further 50 EGS operation notes were analysed between August 2020 and December 2020. Results: One hundred operation notes were reviewed, and each given a score out of 19. Our interventions showed significant improvement to the average score (15.64 vs 17.96; p< 0.001). Within the second cycle, there was a statistically significance difference when comparing electronic to handwritten notes (18.55 vs 17.50; p= 0.001). Conclusion: Implementation of the new proforma showed improvement in operation note documentation when compared to the RCSEng standard. Therefore, this study emphasizes the need for surgeons to familiarize themselves with the current guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信