在门诊评估 COVID-19 后患者时,1 分钟坐立测试对检测运动诱发的氧饱和度的实用性

Muhammad Amin Ibrahim, Chee Chai Shee, Mohd Nazeri Kamarudin, M. F. A. Abdul Rani
{"title":"在门诊评估 COVID-19 后患者时,1 分钟坐立测试对检测运动诱发的氧饱和度的实用性","authors":"Muhammad Amin Ibrahim, Chee Chai Shee, Mohd Nazeri Kamarudin, M. F. A. Abdul Rani","doi":"10.24191/jchs.v9i1.21407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: 6-min-walk-test (6MWT) is the gold standard for assessing exercise-induced impairment of gas exchange, but it is technically challenging in a busy outpatient clinic. The aim of this study was to compare the 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTST) with the 6MWT in assessment of exercise-induced oxygen desaturation in post COVID-19 patients in an outpatient setting. Methods: A total of 447 outpatient post COVID-19 patients were recruited from post COVID-19 clinic. A set of 6MWT and 1MSTST were performed on the same day. Results: A total of 447 sets were performed at a mean of 160 days post discharge. Majority were in COVID-19 infection category 4 (n=251, 56%), 5 (n=118, 26%) and 3 (n=6, 15%). A total of 19% (n=89) of patients remained symptomatic (mMRC >1). There were no significant differences between nadir SpO2 of 6MWT and 1STST (p=0.075). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between nadir SpO2 for 6MWT and 1MSTST (Mean differences=0.028). 1MSTST could detect oxygen desaturation >4% with sensitivity of 76.8% and specificity of 42.4% compared to 6MWT. There was no clinically significant SpO2 difference during 6MWT and 1STS between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at baseline, nadir, and recovery; the differences were <1%. However, there were lesser 6MWT distance and 1MSTST repetition between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients; 47m (p < 0.001) and 3 repetition (p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion: There is a good agreement of nadir SpO2 and sensitivity to detect oxygen desaturation > 4% between 6MWT and 1MSTST. 1MSTST is a useful screening test to screen exercise-induced oxygen desaturation during outpatient assessment.","PeriodicalId":517565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Health Sciences","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility Of 1-Minute Sit-To-Stand Test to Detect Exercise-Induced Oxygen Desaturation in Outpatient Assessment of Post COVID-19 Patients\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Amin Ibrahim, Chee Chai Shee, Mohd Nazeri Kamarudin, M. F. A. Abdul Rani\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/jchs.v9i1.21407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: 6-min-walk-test (6MWT) is the gold standard for assessing exercise-induced impairment of gas exchange, but it is technically challenging in a busy outpatient clinic. The aim of this study was to compare the 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTST) with the 6MWT in assessment of exercise-induced oxygen desaturation in post COVID-19 patients in an outpatient setting. Methods: A total of 447 outpatient post COVID-19 patients were recruited from post COVID-19 clinic. A set of 6MWT and 1MSTST were performed on the same day. Results: A total of 447 sets were performed at a mean of 160 days post discharge. Majority were in COVID-19 infection category 4 (n=251, 56%), 5 (n=118, 26%) and 3 (n=6, 15%). A total of 19% (n=89) of patients remained symptomatic (mMRC >1). There were no significant differences between nadir SpO2 of 6MWT and 1STST (p=0.075). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between nadir SpO2 for 6MWT and 1MSTST (Mean differences=0.028). 1MSTST could detect oxygen desaturation >4% with sensitivity of 76.8% and specificity of 42.4% compared to 6MWT. There was no clinically significant SpO2 difference during 6MWT and 1STS between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at baseline, nadir, and recovery; the differences were <1%. However, there were lesser 6MWT distance and 1MSTST repetition between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients; 47m (p < 0.001) and 3 repetition (p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion: There is a good agreement of nadir SpO2 and sensitivity to detect oxygen desaturation > 4% between 6MWT and 1MSTST. 1MSTST is a useful screening test to screen exercise-induced oxygen desaturation during outpatient assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/jchs.v9i1.21407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/jchs.v9i1.21407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)是评估运动引起的气体交换障碍的黄金标准,但在繁忙的门诊中具有技术挑战性。本研究旨在比较 1 分钟坐立测试(1MSTST)与 6MWT 在评估 COVID-19 后患者运动诱发的氧饱和度降低方面的差异。研究方法从 COVID-19 后门诊招募了 447 名 COVID-19 后患者。在同一天进行一组 6MWT 和 1MSTST。结果:共进行了 447 组测试,平均时间为出院后 160 天。大多数患者属于 COVID-19 感染类别 4(n=251,56%)、5(n=118,26%)和 3(n=6,15%)。共有 19% 的患者(n=89)仍有症状(mMRC >1)。6MWT 和 1STST 的最低 SpO2 无明显差异(P=0.075)。Bland-Altman 图显示,6MWT 和 1MSTST 原始 SpO2 之间的一致性很好(平均差=0.028)。与 6MWT 相比,1MSTST 检测血氧饱和度 >4% 的灵敏度为 76.8%,特异度为 42.4%。在 6MWT 和 1STS 中,有症状和无症状患者在基线、最低点和恢复期的 SpO2 差异没有临床意义;6MWT 和 1MSTST 的差异为 4%。1MSTST 是一项有用的筛查测试,可在门诊评估中筛查运动引起的血氧饱和度降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Utility Of 1-Minute Sit-To-Stand Test to Detect Exercise-Induced Oxygen Desaturation in Outpatient Assessment of Post COVID-19 Patients
Introduction: 6-min-walk-test (6MWT) is the gold standard for assessing exercise-induced impairment of gas exchange, but it is technically challenging in a busy outpatient clinic. The aim of this study was to compare the 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1MSTST) with the 6MWT in assessment of exercise-induced oxygen desaturation in post COVID-19 patients in an outpatient setting. Methods: A total of 447 outpatient post COVID-19 patients were recruited from post COVID-19 clinic. A set of 6MWT and 1MSTST were performed on the same day. Results: A total of 447 sets were performed at a mean of 160 days post discharge. Majority were in COVID-19 infection category 4 (n=251, 56%), 5 (n=118, 26%) and 3 (n=6, 15%). A total of 19% (n=89) of patients remained symptomatic (mMRC >1). There were no significant differences between nadir SpO2 of 6MWT and 1STST (p=0.075). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between nadir SpO2 for 6MWT and 1MSTST (Mean differences=0.028). 1MSTST could detect oxygen desaturation >4% with sensitivity of 76.8% and specificity of 42.4% compared to 6MWT. There was no clinically significant SpO2 difference during 6MWT and 1STS between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at baseline, nadir, and recovery; the differences were <1%. However, there were lesser 6MWT distance and 1MSTST repetition between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients; 47m (p < 0.001) and 3 repetition (p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion: There is a good agreement of nadir SpO2 and sensitivity to detect oxygen desaturation > 4% between 6MWT and 1MSTST. 1MSTST is a useful screening test to screen exercise-induced oxygen desaturation during outpatient assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信