与噪音交易者拔河?来自 G7 股票市场的证据

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Aghamehman Hajiyev, Karl Ludwig Keiber, Adalbert Luczak
{"title":"与噪音交易者拔河?来自 G7 股票市场的证据","authors":"Aghamehman Hajiyev,&nbsp;Karl Ludwig Keiber,&nbsp;Adalbert Luczak","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies the tug of war between overnight noise trading and daytime arbitrage in the G7 stock markets. We confirm Akbas, Boehmer, Jiang, and Koch (2022) reporting that this tug of war predicts future returns in the US stock market. We verify this result also in the Canadian stock market. In contrast, for the stock markets of France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and Japan, this tug of war is not predictive for future returns. These country-wise findings are documented in average raw returns and prevail upon risk adjustment along both Carhart (1997) four factors and Fama and French (2018) six factors. A microstructure perspective on the tug of war suggests that the split evidence between the US and Canadian stock markets and the remaining G7 stock markets is due to institutional and regulatory differences which restrict daytime institutional arbitrage in the European stock markets and Japan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"95 ","pages":"Pages 234-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000498/pdfft?md5=bb8d676c2fd1d4876a356928bafef969&pid=1-s2.0-S1062976924000498-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tug of war with noise traders? Evidence from the G7 stock markets\",\"authors\":\"Aghamehman Hajiyev,&nbsp;Karl Ludwig Keiber,&nbsp;Adalbert Luczak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qref.2024.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper studies the tug of war between overnight noise trading and daytime arbitrage in the G7 stock markets. We confirm Akbas, Boehmer, Jiang, and Koch (2022) reporting that this tug of war predicts future returns in the US stock market. We verify this result also in the Canadian stock market. In contrast, for the stock markets of France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and Japan, this tug of war is not predictive for future returns. These country-wise findings are documented in average raw returns and prevail upon risk adjustment along both Carhart (1997) four factors and Fama and French (2018) six factors. A microstructure perspective on the tug of war suggests that the split evidence between the US and Canadian stock markets and the remaining G7 stock markets is due to institutional and regulatory differences which restrict daytime institutional arbitrage in the European stock markets and Japan.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 234-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000498/pdfft?md5=bb8d676c2fd1d4876a356928bafef969&pid=1-s2.0-S1062976924000498-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000498\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了七国集团股市中隔夜噪音交易与日间套利之间的角力。我们证实了 Akbas、Boehmer、Jiang 和 Koch(2022 年)的报告,即这种拉锯战可预测美国股市的未来回报。我们在加拿大股市也验证了这一结果。相反,对于法国、德国、意大利、英国和日本的股票市场来说,这种拉锯战并不能预测未来的收益。这些按国家划分的研究结果记录在平均原始回报率中,并在根据 Carhart(1997 年)的四个因子和 Fama 与 French(2018 年)的六个因子进行风险调整后得到了体现。拔河比赛的微观结构视角表明,美国和加拿大股市与其余七国集团股市之间的分裂证据是由于制度和监管差异造成的,这些差异限制了欧洲股市和日本的日间制度套利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tug of war with noise traders? Evidence from the G7 stock markets

This paper studies the tug of war between overnight noise trading and daytime arbitrage in the G7 stock markets. We confirm Akbas, Boehmer, Jiang, and Koch (2022) reporting that this tug of war predicts future returns in the US stock market. We verify this result also in the Canadian stock market. In contrast, for the stock markets of France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and Japan, this tug of war is not predictive for future returns. These country-wise findings are documented in average raw returns and prevail upon risk adjustment along both Carhart (1997) four factors and Fama and French (2018) six factors. A microstructure perspective on the tug of war suggests that the split evidence between the US and Canadian stock markets and the remaining G7 stock markets is due to institutional and regulatory differences which restrict daytime institutional arbitrage in the European stock markets and Japan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信