器官捐献的社会学模式解析:分析研究

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hedayatallah Lalehgani, S. Babaee, Ahmad Reza Yazdannick, N. Alimohammadi, Behnam Saneie, Pantea Ramezannejad
{"title":"器官捐献的社会学模式解析:分析研究","authors":"Hedayatallah Lalehgani, S. Babaee, Ahmad Reza Yazdannick, N. Alimohammadi, Behnam Saneie, Pantea Ramezannejad","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_457_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n In many countries, the consent of family members is required for organ donation from brain-dead patients who are potential candidates for organ donation. In this regard, knowing the factors affecting family members’ decision for organ donation can help improve the conditions. This qualitative study aimed to identify the factors affecting family members’ decision-making regarding donation of brain-dead patients’ organs.\n \n \n \n This research applied qualitative research by focusing on the content analysis approach. The study started from April 2021 in Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan and Ayatollah Kashani in Shahrekord and continued until data saturation was reached (September 1401). Participants were assigned to one of three groups: brain-dead patients’ family members who consented to organ donation, brain-dead patients’ family members who declined to consent to organ donation, and people involved in the organ donation process. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. The data were collected using unstructured interviews and the field survey method. In this study, a qualitative content analysis with a contractual approach was used to analyze the data.\n \n \n \n The analysis of the collected data using different methods yielded 11 main categories, including 1) unresponsive healthcare system, 2) inadequate support from government systems, 3) weakness of social work organizations, 4) fear of being stigmatized, 5) cultural values, 6) symbolization, 7) perpetuation and the society’s attitude, 8) development of personality system and generalism, 9) human values, 10) spiritual maturity, and 11) belief-religious challenges, leading finally to three themes, including 1) structural and functional weakness of systems, 2) sociocultural factors, and 3) worldview.\n \n \n \n The findings of the present research were able to identify the roots and social factors affecting Iranian families’ decisions regarding the consent or nonconsent of brain-dead patient members. Health system administrators and organ donation committees in medical sciences universities in Iran can try to solve the shortage of donated organs by using the specific social aspects introduced in this study. It is also recommended to design effective models for more satisfaction of family members for brain death patient organ donation in healthcare based on the underlying concepts of this study.\n","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explanation of the sociological patterns of organ donation: An analytical study\",\"authors\":\"Hedayatallah Lalehgani, S. Babaee, Ahmad Reza Yazdannick, N. Alimohammadi, Behnam Saneie, Pantea Ramezannejad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_457_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n In many countries, the consent of family members is required for organ donation from brain-dead patients who are potential candidates for organ donation. In this regard, knowing the factors affecting family members’ decision for organ donation can help improve the conditions. This qualitative study aimed to identify the factors affecting family members’ decision-making regarding donation of brain-dead patients’ organs.\\n \\n \\n \\n This research applied qualitative research by focusing on the content analysis approach. The study started from April 2021 in Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan and Ayatollah Kashani in Shahrekord and continued until data saturation was reached (September 1401). Participants were assigned to one of three groups: brain-dead patients’ family members who consented to organ donation, brain-dead patients’ family members who declined to consent to organ donation, and people involved in the organ donation process. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. The data were collected using unstructured interviews and the field survey method. In this study, a qualitative content analysis with a contractual approach was used to analyze the data.\\n \\n \\n \\n The analysis of the collected data using different methods yielded 11 main categories, including 1) unresponsive healthcare system, 2) inadequate support from government systems, 3) weakness of social work organizations, 4) fear of being stigmatized, 5) cultural values, 6) symbolization, 7) perpetuation and the society’s attitude, 8) development of personality system and generalism, 9) human values, 10) spiritual maturity, and 11) belief-religious challenges, leading finally to three themes, including 1) structural and functional weakness of systems, 2) sociocultural factors, and 3) worldview.\\n \\n \\n \\n The findings of the present research were able to identify the roots and social factors affecting Iranian families’ decisions regarding the consent or nonconsent of brain-dead patient members. Health system administrators and organ donation committees in medical sciences universities in Iran can try to solve the shortage of donated organs by using the specific social aspects introduced in this study. It is also recommended to design effective models for more satisfaction of family members for brain death patient organ donation in healthcare based on the underlying concepts of this study.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_457_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_457_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多国家,有可能成为器官捐献候选者的脑死亡患者的器官捐献必须征得家属的同意。因此,了解影响家属作出器官捐献决定的因素,有助于改善捐献条件。本定性研究旨在找出影响家属决定捐赠脑死亡患者器官的因素。 本研究采用内容分析法进行定性研究。研究于 2021 年 4 月在伊斯法罕的 Al-Zahra 医院和 Shahrekord 的 Ayatollah Kashani 开始,一直持续到数据达到饱和为止(1401 年 9 月)。参与者被分配到三组中的一组:同意器官捐献的脑死亡患者家属、拒绝同意器官捐献的脑死亡患者家属以及参与器官捐献过程的人员。样本采用目的抽样法选出。数据收集采用非结构化访谈和实地调查法。本研究采用定性内容分析和契约方法对数据进行分析。 使用不同方法对收集到的数据进行分析后,得出了 11 个主要类别,包括 1) 医疗系统反应迟钝;2) 政府系统支持不足;3) 社会工作组织薄弱;4) 害怕被污名化;5) 文化价值观;6) 符号化、7) 长期存在和社会态度,8) 人格体系和通才主义的发展,9) 人的价值,10) 精神成熟度,11) 信仰-宗教挑战,最终形成三个主题,包括 1) 体系结构和功能缺陷,2) 社会文化因素,3) 世界观。 本研究的结果能够确定影响伊朗家庭就脑死亡患者成员同意或不同意做出决定的根源和社会因素。伊朗卫生系统管理者和医科大学器官捐献委员会可以尝试利用本研究中介绍的特定社会方面来解决捐献器官短缺的问题。此外,还建议根据本研究的基本概念设计有效模式,以提高家庭成员对脑死亡患者器官捐赠医疗保健的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explanation of the sociological patterns of organ donation: An analytical study
In many countries, the consent of family members is required for organ donation from brain-dead patients who are potential candidates for organ donation. In this regard, knowing the factors affecting family members’ decision for organ donation can help improve the conditions. This qualitative study aimed to identify the factors affecting family members’ decision-making regarding donation of brain-dead patients’ organs. This research applied qualitative research by focusing on the content analysis approach. The study started from April 2021 in Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan and Ayatollah Kashani in Shahrekord and continued until data saturation was reached (September 1401). Participants were assigned to one of three groups: brain-dead patients’ family members who consented to organ donation, brain-dead patients’ family members who declined to consent to organ donation, and people involved in the organ donation process. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. The data were collected using unstructured interviews and the field survey method. In this study, a qualitative content analysis with a contractual approach was used to analyze the data. The analysis of the collected data using different methods yielded 11 main categories, including 1) unresponsive healthcare system, 2) inadequate support from government systems, 3) weakness of social work organizations, 4) fear of being stigmatized, 5) cultural values, 6) symbolization, 7) perpetuation and the society’s attitude, 8) development of personality system and generalism, 9) human values, 10) spiritual maturity, and 11) belief-religious challenges, leading finally to three themes, including 1) structural and functional weakness of systems, 2) sociocultural factors, and 3) worldview. The findings of the present research were able to identify the roots and social factors affecting Iranian families’ decisions regarding the consent or nonconsent of brain-dead patient members. Health system administrators and organ donation committees in medical sciences universities in Iran can try to solve the shortage of donated organs by using the specific social aspects introduced in this study. It is also recommended to design effective models for more satisfaction of family members for brain death patient organ donation in healthcare based on the underlying concepts of this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信