两种不同层高对 3-D 打印正畸模型精度的影响

Kareem Shendy, Mona Abou El Fotouh, Tarek Ali, Sharaf Eldeen M. Abbas, Shaimaa Abuelsadat
{"title":"两种不同层高对 3-D 打印正畸模型精度的影响","authors":"Kareem Shendy, Mona Abou El Fotouh, Tarek Ali, Sharaf Eldeen M. Abbas, Shaimaa Abuelsadat","doi":"10.21608/asdj.2024.252684.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the 3D printed model by DLP technology at 50-µm and 100-µm layer height Materials and Methods: A desktop scanner, R700 desktop scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to scan an orthodontic typo-dent cast. A total number of (20) models were printed using a Digital Light Processing 3D printer and divided into two separate group. The 1 st group (n=10) and the 2 nd (n=10) groups were printed at 50-μm and 100-μm layer heights respectively. Assessment was performed using the GOM Inspect suite to register both the reference and 3D printed digital models to detect the deviation in both X, Y, and Z axes. Results: Data were presented as mean and standard deviation values and were tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. Data were non-parametric and were tested using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The significance level was set at p≤0.05 within all tests. In the molar area, 50-µm layer thickness showed statistically significant difference in the right side when compared with 100-µm. In the premolar region, there was no statistically significant differences between both groups in the right side except for the z-axis. The canine area demonstrated that the 50-µm layer height was statistically significant lower in deviation than 100-µm group in all directions. There was a strong agreement between both observers (ICC=0.965, 95%CI= (0.958:0.971), p<0.001). Conclusion: the results of our research as a whole show that models printed at 50-μm display lower deviations in X, Y, and Z axes with a more consistent distortion pattern when compared to 100-μm models. Besides, the ideal thickness for high precision requirements is 50 µm, whereas 100-μm could be used in printing diagnostic models.","PeriodicalId":505319,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","volume":"61 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of two different layer heights on the accuracy of 3-D printed orthodontic models\",\"authors\":\"Kareem Shendy, Mona Abou El Fotouh, Tarek Ali, Sharaf Eldeen M. Abbas, Shaimaa Abuelsadat\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asdj.2024.252684.1196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the 3D printed model by DLP technology at 50-µm and 100-µm layer height Materials and Methods: A desktop scanner, R700 desktop scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to scan an orthodontic typo-dent cast. A total number of (20) models were printed using a Digital Light Processing 3D printer and divided into two separate group. The 1 st group (n=10) and the 2 nd (n=10) groups were printed at 50-μm and 100-μm layer heights respectively. Assessment was performed using the GOM Inspect suite to register both the reference and 3D printed digital models to detect the deviation in both X, Y, and Z axes. Results: Data were presented as mean and standard deviation values and were tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. Data were non-parametric and were tested using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The significance level was set at p≤0.05 within all tests. In the molar area, 50-µm layer thickness showed statistically significant difference in the right side when compared with 100-µm. In the premolar region, there was no statistically significant differences between both groups in the right side except for the z-axis. The canine area demonstrated that the 50-µm layer height was statistically significant lower in deviation than 100-µm group in all directions. There was a strong agreement between both observers (ICC=0.965, 95%CI= (0.958:0.971), p<0.001). Conclusion: the results of our research as a whole show that models printed at 50-μm display lower deviations in X, Y, and Z axes with a more consistent distortion pattern when compared to 100-μm models. Besides, the ideal thickness for high precision requirements is 50 µm, whereas 100-μm could be used in printing diagnostic models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.252684.1196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.252684.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估 DLP 技术在 50 微米和 100 微米层高下三维打印模型的准确性:使用台式扫描仪 R700(3Shape,丹麦哥本哈根)扫描正畸牙模。使用数字光处理 3D 打印机打印了总共(20 个)模型,并将其分成两组。第 1 组(n=10)和第 2 组(n=10)的打印层高分别为 50 微米和 100 微米。评估使用 GOM Inspect 套件对参考和三维打印数字模型进行注册,以检测 X、Y 和 Z 轴的偏差。结果:数据以平均值和标准差表示,并使用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验进行正态性检验。数据为非参数数据,采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。所有检验的显著性水平均为 p≤0.05。在磨牙区,右侧 50 微米的牙层厚度与 100 微米的牙层厚度相比有显著的统计学差异。在前磨牙区,除 Z 轴外,两组在右侧的差异无统计学意义。犬齿区显示,在所有方向上,50 微米层高组的偏差均显著低于 100 微米组。两位观察者的测量结果非常一致(ICC=0.965,95%CI= (0.958:0.971),P<0.001)。结论:我们的整体研究结果表明,与 100 微米的模型相比,50 微米打印的模型在 X、Y 和 Z 轴的偏差较小,变形模式更加一致。此外,高精度要求的理想厚度是 50 微米,而 100 微米则可用于打印诊断模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of two different layer heights on the accuracy of 3-D printed orthodontic models
Aim: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the 3D printed model by DLP technology at 50-µm and 100-µm layer height Materials and Methods: A desktop scanner, R700 desktop scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to scan an orthodontic typo-dent cast. A total number of (20) models were printed using a Digital Light Processing 3D printer and divided into two separate group. The 1 st group (n=10) and the 2 nd (n=10) groups were printed at 50-μm and 100-μm layer heights respectively. Assessment was performed using the GOM Inspect suite to register both the reference and 3D printed digital models to detect the deviation in both X, Y, and Z axes. Results: Data were presented as mean and standard deviation values and were tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. Data were non-parametric and were tested using Wilcoxon signed rank test. The significance level was set at p≤0.05 within all tests. In the molar area, 50-µm layer thickness showed statistically significant difference in the right side when compared with 100-µm. In the premolar region, there was no statistically significant differences between both groups in the right side except for the z-axis. The canine area demonstrated that the 50-µm layer height was statistically significant lower in deviation than 100-µm group in all directions. There was a strong agreement between both observers (ICC=0.965, 95%CI= (0.958:0.971), p<0.001). Conclusion: the results of our research as a whole show that models printed at 50-μm display lower deviations in X, Y, and Z axes with a more consistent distortion pattern when compared to 100-μm models. Besides, the ideal thickness for high precision requirements is 50 µm, whereas 100-μm could be used in printing diagnostic models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信