Mathieu Duval , Lee J. Arnold , Jean-Jacques Bahain , Josep M. Parés , Martina Demuro , Christophe Falguères , Qingfeng Shao , Pierre Voinchet , Julie Arnaud , Claudio Berto , Gabriele Luigi Francesco Berruti , Sara Daffara , Benedetto Sala , Marta Arzarello
{"title":"重新审视西欧人类存在的最早证据:北皮罗(意大利)的新测年结果","authors":"Mathieu Duval , Lee J. Arnold , Jean-Jacques Bahain , Josep M. Parés , Martina Demuro , Christophe Falguères , Qingfeng Shao , Pierre Voinchet , Julie Arnaud , Claudio Berto , Gabriele Luigi Francesco Berruti , Sara Daffara , Benedetto Sala , Marta Arzarello","doi":"10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present the results of the first dating study of site P13 at Pirro Nord, Italy, which documents some of the earliest evidence for hominin presence in western Europe. Our multi-technique dating approach is based on a combination of palaeomagnetism, electron spin resonance (ESR), thermally-transferred optically stimulated luminescence (TT-OSL) and combined U-series/ESR applied to both fossil material and host sediment. It provides ages ranging from 627 ± 59 to 1006 ± 126 ka and clustering around 0.8 Ma. One additional fossil tooth collected from the nearby P10 site also returns an age within this range. Ordinarily, this outcome would naturally lend itself to the straightforward conclusion that Pirro Nord has a late Early Pleistocene age of ∼0.8 Ma. However, this interpretation is complicated by the fact that these numerical dating results are in contradiction with the biochronological evidence, which suggests a much older age on the order of 1.3–1.7 Ma. Consequently, we explore the various potential sources of bias that could have influenced the numerical dating methods and the biochronological inferences. In particular, the critical evaluation of the palaeomagnetic data available for various sites belonging to the younger Colle Curti Faunal Unit (FU) indicates that there is non-negligible age uncertainty on the allegedly minimum age of ∼1.1 Ma traditionally assigned to the Pirro FU. Moreover, while the combined U-series/ESR dataset could accommodate an older age for the fossil remains if uranium uptake in the dental tissues occurred relatively rapidly before the closure of the system (CSUS model), the ages obtained from the two semi-independent quartz dating methods (ESR and TT-OSL) both appear to indicate that the sediment was last exposed to sunlight about 0.8 Ma. This disparity opens up the possibility that the sediment and fossil assemblage may not be coeval. In other words, it is possible that the fossil remains may have been reworked into younger deposits that entered the karst about 0.8 Ma. Though feasible from a karst sedimentary dynamics perspective, this hypothesis is not consistent with previous taphonomic studies that indicate an absence of evidence for fossil reworking after entering the karst. At the very least, our dating results indicate that site formation processes at Pirro Nord site P13 are more complex than previously considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54516,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Geochronology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-examining the earliest evidence of human presence in western Europe: New dating results from Pirro Nord (Italy)\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Duval , Lee J. Arnold , Jean-Jacques Bahain , Josep M. Parés , Martina Demuro , Christophe Falguères , Qingfeng Shao , Pierre Voinchet , Julie Arnaud , Claudio Berto , Gabriele Luigi Francesco Berruti , Sara Daffara , Benedetto Sala , Marta Arzarello\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quageo.2024.101519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present the results of the first dating study of site P13 at Pirro Nord, Italy, which documents some of the earliest evidence for hominin presence in western Europe. Our multi-technique dating approach is based on a combination of palaeomagnetism, electron spin resonance (ESR), thermally-transferred optically stimulated luminescence (TT-OSL) and combined U-series/ESR applied to both fossil material and host sediment. It provides ages ranging from 627 ± 59 to 1006 ± 126 ka and clustering around 0.8 Ma. One additional fossil tooth collected from the nearby P10 site also returns an age within this range. Ordinarily, this outcome would naturally lend itself to the straightforward conclusion that Pirro Nord has a late Early Pleistocene age of ∼0.8 Ma. However, this interpretation is complicated by the fact that these numerical dating results are in contradiction with the biochronological evidence, which suggests a much older age on the order of 1.3–1.7 Ma. Consequently, we explore the various potential sources of bias that could have influenced the numerical dating methods and the biochronological inferences. In particular, the critical evaluation of the palaeomagnetic data available for various sites belonging to the younger Colle Curti Faunal Unit (FU) indicates that there is non-negligible age uncertainty on the allegedly minimum age of ∼1.1 Ma traditionally assigned to the Pirro FU. Moreover, while the combined U-series/ESR dataset could accommodate an older age for the fossil remains if uranium uptake in the dental tissues occurred relatively rapidly before the closure of the system (CSUS model), the ages obtained from the two semi-independent quartz dating methods (ESR and TT-OSL) both appear to indicate that the sediment was last exposed to sunlight about 0.8 Ma. This disparity opens up the possibility that the sediment and fossil assemblage may not be coeval. In other words, it is possible that the fossil remains may have been reworked into younger deposits that entered the karst about 0.8 Ma. Though feasible from a karst sedimentary dynamics perspective, this hypothesis is not consistent with previous taphonomic studies that indicate an absence of evidence for fossil reworking after entering the karst. At the very least, our dating results indicate that site formation processes at Pirro Nord site P13 are more complex than previously considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Geochronology\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424000232\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101424000232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们介绍了对意大利皮尔洛诺德 P13 遗址进行的首次年代测定研究的结果,该遗址记录了西欧出现类人猿的一些最早证据。我们的多技术测年方法基于古地磁学、电子自旋共振(ESR)、热转移光激发发光(TT-OSL)以及同时应用于化石材料和寄主沉积物的联合 U 系列/ESR。它提供了从 627 ± 59 到 1006 ± 126 ka 的年龄,并集中在 0.8 Ma 左右。从附近的 P10 遗址采集的另一颗牙齿化石的年龄也在这一范围内。通常,这一结果自然会让人直接得出结论:北皮尔罗的早更新世晚期年龄为 0.8 Ma。然而,这些数字测年结果与生物年代学证据相矛盾,后者显示的年代要早得多,约为 1.3-1.7 Ma。因此,我们探讨了可能影响数字测年方法和生物年代学推断的各种潜在偏差来源。特别是,对属于较年轻的 Colle Curti 动物群单元(FU)的各个地点的古地磁数据进行的批判性评估表明,传统上为 Pirro 动物群单元指定的最低年龄 ∼1.1 Ma 存在不可忽略的年龄不确定性。此外,如果牙齿组织对铀的吸收发生在系统关闭之前相对较快(CSUS 模型),则综合 U 系列/ESR 数据集可为化石遗骸提供更早的年龄,但两种半独立石英测年方法(ESR 和 TT-OSL)获得的年龄似乎都表明沉积物最后一次暴露于阳光下的时间约为 0.8 Ma。这种差异使得沉积物和化石群有可能不是共生的。换句话说,化石遗迹有可能是在大约 0.8 Ma 时进入岩溶的较年轻沉积物中再加工而成的。尽管从岩溶沉积动力学的角度来看,这一假设是可行的,但它与之前的岩石学研究并不一致,因为之前的研究表明,没有证据表明化石在进入岩溶后进行了再加工。至少,我们的测年结果表明,Pirro Nord P13 遗址的形成过程比之前认为的要复杂得多。
Re-examining the earliest evidence of human presence in western Europe: New dating results from Pirro Nord (Italy)
We present the results of the first dating study of site P13 at Pirro Nord, Italy, which documents some of the earliest evidence for hominin presence in western Europe. Our multi-technique dating approach is based on a combination of palaeomagnetism, electron spin resonance (ESR), thermally-transferred optically stimulated luminescence (TT-OSL) and combined U-series/ESR applied to both fossil material and host sediment. It provides ages ranging from 627 ± 59 to 1006 ± 126 ka and clustering around 0.8 Ma. One additional fossil tooth collected from the nearby P10 site also returns an age within this range. Ordinarily, this outcome would naturally lend itself to the straightforward conclusion that Pirro Nord has a late Early Pleistocene age of ∼0.8 Ma. However, this interpretation is complicated by the fact that these numerical dating results are in contradiction with the biochronological evidence, which suggests a much older age on the order of 1.3–1.7 Ma. Consequently, we explore the various potential sources of bias that could have influenced the numerical dating methods and the biochronological inferences. In particular, the critical evaluation of the palaeomagnetic data available for various sites belonging to the younger Colle Curti Faunal Unit (FU) indicates that there is non-negligible age uncertainty on the allegedly minimum age of ∼1.1 Ma traditionally assigned to the Pirro FU. Moreover, while the combined U-series/ESR dataset could accommodate an older age for the fossil remains if uranium uptake in the dental tissues occurred relatively rapidly before the closure of the system (CSUS model), the ages obtained from the two semi-independent quartz dating methods (ESR and TT-OSL) both appear to indicate that the sediment was last exposed to sunlight about 0.8 Ma. This disparity opens up the possibility that the sediment and fossil assemblage may not be coeval. In other words, it is possible that the fossil remains may have been reworked into younger deposits that entered the karst about 0.8 Ma. Though feasible from a karst sedimentary dynamics perspective, this hypothesis is not consistent with previous taphonomic studies that indicate an absence of evidence for fossil reworking after entering the karst. At the very least, our dating results indicate that site formation processes at Pirro Nord site P13 are more complex than previously considered.
期刊介绍:
Quaternary Geochronology is an international journal devoted to the publication of the highest-quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of dating methods applicable to the Quaternary Period - the last 2.6 million years of Earth history. Reliable ages are fundamental to place changes in climates, landscapes, flora and fauna - including the evolution and ecological impact of humans - in their correct temporal sequence, and to understand the tempo and mode of geological and biological processes.