PjBL 和 PBL 模式对学生认知学习成果的效果比较

Anik Suryani, Irma Setiawan, Syafruddin Muhdar, Fatmala Sari Oktaviani
{"title":"PjBL 和 PBL 模式对学生认知学习成果的效果比较","authors":"Anik Suryani, Irma Setiawan, Syafruddin Muhdar, Fatmala Sari Oktaviani","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the autonomous curriculum, problem-based and PjBL paradigms are given priority. In terms of cognitive learning outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PjBL and PBL models. This study employs a nonequivalent control group design and quantitative methodologies. Two groups are used in this study design: the control group employs the PBL model, while the experiment group uses the PjBL model. Forty fifth-grade children from a state elementary school in Cakranegara served as the study sample. A multiple-choice exam with 20 items was employed as the data gathering method. The experiment group's average score on the pre-test was 65.75 and their post-test was 81.25, while the control group's average score on the pre-test was 65.75 and their post-test was 75.50. The normality test revealed that the two groups' pre-test scores were identical, at 0.222, and their post-test scores were 0.109 and 0.063, respectively. These data analysis techniques include descriptive analysis tests. In order to achieve the findings of the precondition test of data testing using the SPSS 25 for Windows program, the homogeneity test was derived from the results based on a mean of 1.000. The data was homogenous and had a normal distribution, according to the findings. A significant value (2-tailed) of 0.0370.05 was shown by the data. In order to achieve the findings of the precondition test of data testing using the SPSS 25 for Windows program, the homogeneity test was derived from the results based on a mean of 1.000. The data was homogenous and had a normal distribution, according to the findings. A significant value (2-tailed) of 0.0370.05 was shown by the data. The experiment group and control group showed different cognitive learning results. Following treatment, the experiment group's average value was 81.25 whereas the control group's was 75.50. The experiment group (PjBL) is, therefore, more effective than the control group (PBL), it may be inferred. It has been demonstrated that utilizing both learning models enhances learning results.","PeriodicalId":515926,"journal":{"name":"AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"68 S310","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Effectiveness of PjBL and PBL Models on Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Anik Suryani, Irma Setiawan, Syafruddin Muhdar, Fatmala Sari Oktaviani\",\"doi\":\"10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the autonomous curriculum, problem-based and PjBL paradigms are given priority. In terms of cognitive learning outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PjBL and PBL models. This study employs a nonequivalent control group design and quantitative methodologies. Two groups are used in this study design: the control group employs the PBL model, while the experiment group uses the PjBL model. Forty fifth-grade children from a state elementary school in Cakranegara served as the study sample. A multiple-choice exam with 20 items was employed as the data gathering method. The experiment group's average score on the pre-test was 65.75 and their post-test was 81.25, while the control group's average score on the pre-test was 65.75 and their post-test was 75.50. The normality test revealed that the two groups' pre-test scores were identical, at 0.222, and their post-test scores were 0.109 and 0.063, respectively. These data analysis techniques include descriptive analysis tests. In order to achieve the findings of the precondition test of data testing using the SPSS 25 for Windows program, the homogeneity test was derived from the results based on a mean of 1.000. The data was homogenous and had a normal distribution, according to the findings. A significant value (2-tailed) of 0.0370.05 was shown by the data. In order to achieve the findings of the precondition test of data testing using the SPSS 25 for Windows program, the homogeneity test was derived from the results based on a mean of 1.000. The data was homogenous and had a normal distribution, according to the findings. A significant value (2-tailed) of 0.0370.05 was shown by the data. The experiment group and control group showed different cognitive learning results. Following treatment, the experiment group's average value was 81.25 whereas the control group's was 75.50. The experiment group (PjBL) is, therefore, more effective than the control group (PBL), it may be inferred. It has been demonstrated that utilizing both learning models enhances learning results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\"68 S310\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在自主课程中,以问题为基础和 PjBL 模式是优先考虑的。在认知学习成果方面,本研究旨在评估 PjBL 和 PBL 模式的有效性。本研究采用非等效对照组设计和定量方法。本研究设计了两组:对照组采用 PBL 模式,实验组采用 PjBL 模式。研究样本是来自 Cakranegara 州立小学的 40 名五年级学生。数据收集方法采用了包含 20 个项目的选择题考试。实验组的前测平均分为 65.75 分,后测平均分为 81.25 分;对照组的前测平均分为 65.75 分,后测平均分为 75.50 分。正态性检验显示,两组的前测得分相同,均为 0.222,后测得分分别为 0.109 和 0.063。这些数据分析技术包括描述性分析测试。为了实现使用 SPSS 25 for Windows 程序进行数据检验的前提条件检验结果,根据平均值 1.000 得出了同质性检验结果。根据检验结果,数据具有同质性,且呈正态分布。数据的显着值(双尾)为 0.0370.05。为了实现使用 SPSS 25 for Windows 程序进行数据检验的前提条件检验结果,根据平均值 1.000 得出了同质性检验结果。根据检验结果,数据具有同质性,且呈正态分布。数据的显着值(双尾)为 0.0370.05。实验组和对照组的认知学习结果不同。治疗后,实验组的平均值为 81.25,而对照组为 75.50。因此,可以推断实验组(PjBL)比对照组(PBL)更有效。事实证明,利用这两种学习模式都能提高学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparison of Effectiveness of PjBL and PBL Models on Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes
In the autonomous curriculum, problem-based and PjBL paradigms are given priority. In terms of cognitive learning outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PjBL and PBL models. This study employs a nonequivalent control group design and quantitative methodologies. Two groups are used in this study design: the control group employs the PBL model, while the experiment group uses the PjBL model. Forty fifth-grade children from a state elementary school in Cakranegara served as the study sample. A multiple-choice exam with 20 items was employed as the data gathering method. The experiment group's average score on the pre-test was 65.75 and their post-test was 81.25, while the control group's average score on the pre-test was 65.75 and their post-test was 75.50. The normality test revealed that the two groups' pre-test scores were identical, at 0.222, and their post-test scores were 0.109 and 0.063, respectively. These data analysis techniques include descriptive analysis tests. In order to achieve the findings of the precondition test of data testing using the SPSS 25 for Windows program, the homogeneity test was derived from the results based on a mean of 1.000. The data was homogenous and had a normal distribution, according to the findings. A significant value (2-tailed) of 0.0370.05 was shown by the data. In order to achieve the findings of the precondition test of data testing using the SPSS 25 for Windows program, the homogeneity test was derived from the results based on a mean of 1.000. The data was homogenous and had a normal distribution, according to the findings. A significant value (2-tailed) of 0.0370.05 was shown by the data. The experiment group and control group showed different cognitive learning results. Following treatment, the experiment group's average value was 81.25 whereas the control group's was 75.50. The experiment group (PjBL) is, therefore, more effective than the control group (PBL), it may be inferred. It has been demonstrated that utilizing both learning models enhances learning results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信