提高学生创新思维能力的化学学习系统性文献综述

J. Penelitian, Pendidikan Ipa, I. N. Suardana, Wayan Redhana, Kompyang Selamet
{"title":"提高学生创新思维能力的化学学习系统性文献综述","authors":"J. Penelitian, Pendidikan Ipa, I. N. Suardana, Wayan Redhana, Kompyang Selamet","doi":"10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to discuss novel approaches to teaching chemistry that enhance students' creative thinking skills (CTSs), as well as the kinds of research that are conducted and the tools that are used to measure CTSs. . This research use the PRISMA paradigm in conjunction with a systematic literature review approach. This method was employed by searching for Google Scholar. The analysis results of eight relevant journals and proceeding articles show five articles discussing the implementation of chemistry learning strategies to improve students’ CTSs, with the distribution as follows: problem-based learning-scaffolding, STEAM-PjBL, case-based Learning, STMCpE textbooks based on chemo-entrepreneurship, and students’ worksheet with the mind mapping strategy which amounts to 20.00% each. The types of research used were experimental methods (37.50%), research and developmental methods (12.50%), survey research (12.50%), ex post facto research (12.50%), and qualitative research (descriptive approach) (25.00%). Instruments for measuring CTSs are in the form of a CTS test with indicators developed by Torrance (75.00%), non-test (interview and observation) (12.50%), and unclear instrument (12.50%).","PeriodicalId":31522,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Literature Review of Chemistry Learning to Improve Students’ Creative Thinking Skills\",\"authors\":\"J. Penelitian, Pendidikan Ipa, I. N. Suardana, Wayan Redhana, Kompyang Selamet\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to discuss novel approaches to teaching chemistry that enhance students' creative thinking skills (CTSs), as well as the kinds of research that are conducted and the tools that are used to measure CTSs. . This research use the PRISMA paradigm in conjunction with a systematic literature review approach. This method was employed by searching for Google Scholar. The analysis results of eight relevant journals and proceeding articles show five articles discussing the implementation of chemistry learning strategies to improve students’ CTSs, with the distribution as follows: problem-based learning-scaffolding, STEAM-PjBL, case-based Learning, STMCpE textbooks based on chemo-entrepreneurship, and students’ worksheet with the mind mapping strategy which amounts to 20.00% each. The types of research used were experimental methods (37.50%), research and developmental methods (12.50%), survey research (12.50%), ex post facto research (12.50%), and qualitative research (descriptive approach) (25.00%). Instruments for measuring CTSs are in the form of a CTS test with indicators developed by Torrance (75.00%), non-test (interview and observation) (12.50%), and unclear instrument (12.50%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":31522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在讨论提高学生创造性思维能力(CTSs)的化学教学新方法,以及所开展的研究类型和用于测量 CTSs 的工具。.本研究采用 PRISMA 范式和系统文献综述方法。这种方法是通过搜索谷歌学术(Google Scholar)来实现的。对 8 篇相关期刊和论文的分析结果显示,有 5 篇文章讨论了实施化学学习策略以提高学生的 CTSs,其分布情况如下:基于问题的学习--支架式学习、STEAM-PjBL、基于案例的学习、基于化学创业的 STMCpE 教科书,以及采用思维导图策略的学生工作表,各占 20.00%。使用的研究类型包括实验方法(37.50%)、研究和发展方法(12.50%)、调查研究(12.50%)、事后研究(12.50%)和定性研究(描述性方法)(25.00%)。测量 "儿童体能智力测验 "的工具有托伦斯开发的带指标的 "儿童体能智力测验 "测试(75.00%)、非测试(访谈和观察)(12.50%)和不明确的工具(12.50%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Literature Review of Chemistry Learning to Improve Students’ Creative Thinking Skills
The purpose of this study is to discuss novel approaches to teaching chemistry that enhance students' creative thinking skills (CTSs), as well as the kinds of research that are conducted and the tools that are used to measure CTSs. . This research use the PRISMA paradigm in conjunction with a systematic literature review approach. This method was employed by searching for Google Scholar. The analysis results of eight relevant journals and proceeding articles show five articles discussing the implementation of chemistry learning strategies to improve students’ CTSs, with the distribution as follows: problem-based learning-scaffolding, STEAM-PjBL, case-based Learning, STMCpE textbooks based on chemo-entrepreneurship, and students’ worksheet with the mind mapping strategy which amounts to 20.00% each. The types of research used were experimental methods (37.50%), research and developmental methods (12.50%), survey research (12.50%), ex post facto research (12.50%), and qualitative research (descriptive approach) (25.00%). Instruments for measuring CTSs are in the form of a CTS test with indicators developed by Torrance (75.00%), non-test (interview and observation) (12.50%), and unclear instrument (12.50%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信