利用流域记忆和基于过程的建模进行河水流量预测的混合深度学习方法

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 WATER RESOURCES
B. Yifru, Kyoung Jae Lim, J. Bae, Woonji Park, Seoro Lee
{"title":"利用流域记忆和基于过程的建模进行河水流量预测的混合深度学习方法","authors":"B. Yifru, Kyoung Jae Lim, J. Bae, Woonji Park, Seoro Lee","doi":"10.2166/nh.2024.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accurate streamflow prediction is essential for optimal water management and disaster preparedness. While data-driven methods’ performance often surpasses process-based models, concerns regarding their ‘black-box’ nature persist. Hybrid models, integrating domain knowledge and process modeling into a data-driven framework, offer enhanced streamflow prediction capabilities. This study investigated watershed memory and process modeling-based hybridizing approaches across diverse hydrological regimes – Korean and Ethiopian watersheds. Following watershed memory analysis, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated using the recession constant and other relevant parameters. Three hybrid models, incorporating watershed memory and residual error, were developed and evaluated against standalone long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Hybrids outperformed the standalone LSTM across all watersheds. The memory-based approach exhibited superior and consistent performance across training, evaluation periods, and regions, achieving 17–66% Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient improvement. The residual error-based technique showed varying performance across regions. While hybrids improved extreme event predictions, particularly peak flows, all models struggled at low flow. Korean watersheds’ significant prediction improvements highlight the hybrid models’ effectiveness in regions with pronounced temporal hydrological variability. This study underscores the importance of selecting a specific hybrid approach based on the desired objectives rather than solely relying on statistical metrics that often reflect average performance.","PeriodicalId":13096,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A hybrid deep learning approach for streamflow prediction utilizing watershed memory and process-based modeling\",\"authors\":\"B. Yifru, Kyoung Jae Lim, J. Bae, Woonji Park, Seoro Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/nh.2024.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accurate streamflow prediction is essential for optimal water management and disaster preparedness. While data-driven methods’ performance often surpasses process-based models, concerns regarding their ‘black-box’ nature persist. Hybrid models, integrating domain knowledge and process modeling into a data-driven framework, offer enhanced streamflow prediction capabilities. This study investigated watershed memory and process modeling-based hybridizing approaches across diverse hydrological regimes – Korean and Ethiopian watersheds. Following watershed memory analysis, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated using the recession constant and other relevant parameters. Three hybrid models, incorporating watershed memory and residual error, were developed and evaluated against standalone long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Hybrids outperformed the standalone LSTM across all watersheds. The memory-based approach exhibited superior and consistent performance across training, evaluation periods, and regions, achieving 17–66% Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient improvement. The residual error-based technique showed varying performance across regions. While hybrids improved extreme event predictions, particularly peak flows, all models struggled at low flow. Korean watersheds’ significant prediction improvements highlight the hybrid models’ effectiveness in regions with pronounced temporal hydrological variability. This study underscores the importance of selecting a specific hybrid approach based on the desired objectives rather than solely relying on statistical metrics that often reflect average performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的河水流量预测对于优化水资源管理和备灾至关重要。虽然数据驱动方法的性能往往超过基于过程的模型,但对其 "黑箱 "性质的担忧依然存在。混合模型将领域知识和过程建模整合到数据驱动框架中,可增强水流预测能力。本研究调查了韩国和埃塞俄比亚流域等不同水文条件下的流域记忆和基于过程建模的混合方法。在进行流域记忆分析后,使用衰退常数和其他相关参数对水土评估工具(SWAT)进行了校准。开发了三种包含流域记忆和残余误差的混合模型,并与独立的长短期记忆(LSTM)模型进行了对比评估。在所有流域中,混合模型的表现都优于独立的 LSTM 模型。基于记忆的方法在不同训练期、评估期和不同地区都表现出卓越而稳定的性能,纳什-苏特克利夫效率系数提高了 17-66%。基于残余误差的技术在不同地区表现出不同的性能。虽然混合模型改进了极端事件预测,尤其是峰值流量预测,但所有模型在低流量时都表现不佳。韩国流域的预测效果明显改善,这凸显了混合模型在具有明显时间水文变异性地区的有效性。这项研究强调了根据预期目标选择特定混合方法的重要性,而不是仅仅依赖通常反映平均性能的统计指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A hybrid deep learning approach for streamflow prediction utilizing watershed memory and process-based modeling
Accurate streamflow prediction is essential for optimal water management and disaster preparedness. While data-driven methods’ performance often surpasses process-based models, concerns regarding their ‘black-box’ nature persist. Hybrid models, integrating domain knowledge and process modeling into a data-driven framework, offer enhanced streamflow prediction capabilities. This study investigated watershed memory and process modeling-based hybridizing approaches across diverse hydrological regimes – Korean and Ethiopian watersheds. Following watershed memory analysis, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated using the recession constant and other relevant parameters. Three hybrid models, incorporating watershed memory and residual error, were developed and evaluated against standalone long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Hybrids outperformed the standalone LSTM across all watersheds. The memory-based approach exhibited superior and consistent performance across training, evaluation periods, and regions, achieving 17–66% Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient improvement. The residual error-based technique showed varying performance across regions. While hybrids improved extreme event predictions, particularly peak flows, all models struggled at low flow. Korean watersheds’ significant prediction improvements highlight the hybrid models’ effectiveness in regions with pronounced temporal hydrological variability. This study underscores the importance of selecting a specific hybrid approach based on the desired objectives rather than solely relying on statistical metrics that often reflect average performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrology Research
Hydrology Research WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Hydrology Research provides international coverage on all aspects of hydrology in its widest sense, and welcomes the submission of papers from across the subject. While emphasis is placed on studies of the hydrological cycle, the Journal also covers the physics and chemistry of water. Hydrology Research is intended to be a link between basic hydrological research and the practical application of scientific results within the broad field of water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信