大流行病中知识类型和维度相互作用的框架--以 COVID-19 为例

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Nakul Parameswar, Krishna Venkitachalam
{"title":"大流行病中知识类型和维度相互作用的框架--以 COVID-19 为例","authors":"Nakul Parameswar,&nbsp;Krishna Venkitachalam","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent literature has documented numerous knowledge management (KM) policy frameworks and models utilised for managing pandemics such as COVID-19. Perhaps the major focus of existing scholarly work is on the role and relevance of healthcare KM in the COVID-19 crisis compared to the understanding of healthcare knowledge dimensions and knowledge types in pandemic management and control. Considering the complexities of COVID-19, we attempt to address a literature gap in the management knowledge of pandemics as the study problem in this paper. The paper proposes a framework to analyse the interplay between the dimensions and knowledge types and its application benefits using the example of COVID-19 management in the state of Kerala. Considering the disparities in how the pandemic was managed globally, we use the Kerala case to illuminate the different interactions between the three types and four dimensions of knowledge for pandemic management. Future studies may explore the extension and testing of the proposed interplay framework in other contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"31 3","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework on interplay of knowledge types and dimensions in pandemics – Example of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Nakul Parameswar,&nbsp;Krishna Venkitachalam\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/kpm.1775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent literature has documented numerous knowledge management (KM) policy frameworks and models utilised for managing pandemics such as COVID-19. Perhaps the major focus of existing scholarly work is on the role and relevance of healthcare KM in the COVID-19 crisis compared to the understanding of healthcare knowledge dimensions and knowledge types in pandemic management and control. Considering the complexities of COVID-19, we attempt to address a literature gap in the management knowledge of pandemics as the study problem in this paper. The paper proposes a framework to analyse the interplay between the dimensions and knowledge types and its application benefits using the example of COVID-19 management in the state of Kerala. Considering the disparities in how the pandemic was managed globally, we use the Kerala case to illuminate the different interactions between the three types and four dimensions of knowledge for pandemic management. Future studies may explore the extension and testing of the proposed interplay framework in other contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"221-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的文献记录了许多用于管理 COVID-19 等流行病的知识管理(KM)政策框架和模式。与了解大流行病管理和控制中的医疗保健知识维度和知识类型相比,现有学术著作的主要重点可能是医疗保健知识管理在 COVID-19 危机中的作用和相关性。考虑到 COVID-19 的复杂性,我们试图将解决流行病管理知识方面的文献空白作为本文的研究问题。本文以喀拉拉邦的 COVID-19 管理为例,提出了一个分析各维度和知识类型之间相互作用及其应用效益的框架。考虑到全球管理大流行病的方式存在差异,我们利用喀拉拉邦的案例来阐明大流行病管理知识的三种类型和四个维度之间的不同相互作用。未来的研究可能会探索在其他情况下扩展和检验拟议的相互作用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A framework on interplay of knowledge types and dimensions in pandemics – Example of COVID-19

Recent literature has documented numerous knowledge management (KM) policy frameworks and models utilised for managing pandemics such as COVID-19. Perhaps the major focus of existing scholarly work is on the role and relevance of healthcare KM in the COVID-19 crisis compared to the understanding of healthcare knowledge dimensions and knowledge types in pandemic management and control. Considering the complexities of COVID-19, we attempt to address a literature gap in the management knowledge of pandemics as the study problem in this paper. The paper proposes a framework to analyse the interplay between the dimensions and knowledge types and its application benefits using the example of COVID-19 management in the state of Kerala. Considering the disparities in how the pandemic was managed globally, we use the Kerala case to illuminate the different interactions between the three types and four dimensions of knowledge for pandemic management. Future studies may explore the extension and testing of the proposed interplay framework in other contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信