组织非人性化助长机会主义行为:社会交换视角

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Afshan Bibi, Sidrah Al Hassan, Hafsah Zahur
{"title":"组织非人性化助长机会主义行为:社会交换视角","authors":"Afshan Bibi, Sidrah Al Hassan, Hafsah Zahur","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.12612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations generally treat their employees as tools for attaining maximum efficiency to achieve their production targets. In this regard, it is important to note that the global post‐pandemic era spiced up with technological advent has further catalysed the existing mechanistic approach towards the workforce. Moreover, the investigation of organizational dehumanization in the Asian region has its unique significance. This pervasive phenomenon needs scholarly attention to realize its deleterious outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between organizational dehumanization and opportunistic behaviour. Moreover, the underlying mechanism of calculative commitment was proposed along with the negative reciprocity norms moderating the indirect effect of organization dehumanization to opportunistic behaviour through calculative commitment. The proposed model was grounded on the assumptions of social exchange theory. The survey method was utilized to collect from the service sector organizations operating in both private and public sector organizations in the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. The data were collected in three‐time lags (2 weeks), with peer‐reported opportunistic behaviour. The CFA was done, followed by the utilization of model 4 and model 7 to test hypotheses. The results established a positive relationship between organizational dehumanization and opportunistic behaviour. Moreover, the mediation of calculative commitment was proven empirically with the high levels of negative reciprocity norms strengthening the indirect effect of organizational dehumanization to opportunistic behaviour through calculative commitment.","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational dehumanization fuelling opportunistic behaviour: A social exchange perspective\",\"authors\":\"Afshan Bibi, Sidrah Al Hassan, Hafsah Zahur\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajsp.12612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations generally treat their employees as tools for attaining maximum efficiency to achieve their production targets. In this regard, it is important to note that the global post‐pandemic era spiced up with technological advent has further catalysed the existing mechanistic approach towards the workforce. Moreover, the investigation of organizational dehumanization in the Asian region has its unique significance. This pervasive phenomenon needs scholarly attention to realize its deleterious outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between organizational dehumanization and opportunistic behaviour. Moreover, the underlying mechanism of calculative commitment was proposed along with the negative reciprocity norms moderating the indirect effect of organization dehumanization to opportunistic behaviour through calculative commitment. The proposed model was grounded on the assumptions of social exchange theory. The survey method was utilized to collect from the service sector organizations operating in both private and public sector organizations in the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. The data were collected in three‐time lags (2 weeks), with peer‐reported opportunistic behaviour. The CFA was done, followed by the utilization of model 4 and model 7 to test hypotheses. The results established a positive relationship between organizational dehumanization and opportunistic behaviour. Moreover, the mediation of calculative commitment was proven empirically with the high levels of negative reciprocity norms strengthening the indirect effect of organizational dehumanization to opportunistic behaviour through calculative commitment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各组织通常将员工视为实现生产目标的最高效率的工具。在这方面,有必要指出的是,全球后流行病时代的到来与技术的进步进一步催化了现有的对待劳动力的机械方法。此外,对亚洲地区组织非人性化的调查也有其独特的意义。这一普遍现象需要学术界的关注,以了解其有害结果。因此,本研究旨在探讨组织非人性化与机会主义行为之间的关系。此外,还提出了计算承诺的内在机制,以及通过计算承诺调节组织非人性化对机会主义行为间接影响的负互惠规范。所提出的模型基于社会交换理论的假设。研究采用调查方法,从巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第和伊斯兰堡双城的私营和公共部门服务业组织中收集数据。数据以三次滞后(2 周)收集,由同行报告机会主义行为。进行了 CFA 检验,然后利用模型 4 和模型 7 检验假设。结果表明,组织非人性化与机会主义行为之间存在正相关关系。此外,经验证明了计算承诺的中介作用,高水平的负互惠规范通过计算承诺加强了组织非人性化对机会主义行为的间接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational dehumanization fuelling opportunistic behaviour: A social exchange perspective
Organizations generally treat their employees as tools for attaining maximum efficiency to achieve their production targets. In this regard, it is important to note that the global post‐pandemic era spiced up with technological advent has further catalysed the existing mechanistic approach towards the workforce. Moreover, the investigation of organizational dehumanization in the Asian region has its unique significance. This pervasive phenomenon needs scholarly attention to realize its deleterious outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between organizational dehumanization and opportunistic behaviour. Moreover, the underlying mechanism of calculative commitment was proposed along with the negative reciprocity norms moderating the indirect effect of organization dehumanization to opportunistic behaviour through calculative commitment. The proposed model was grounded on the assumptions of social exchange theory. The survey method was utilized to collect from the service sector organizations operating in both private and public sector organizations in the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. The data were collected in three‐time lags (2 weeks), with peer‐reported opportunistic behaviour. The CFA was done, followed by the utilization of model 4 and model 7 to test hypotheses. The results established a positive relationship between organizational dehumanization and opportunistic behaviour. Moreover, the mediation of calculative commitment was proven empirically with the high levels of negative reciprocity norms strengthening the indirect effect of organizational dehumanization to opportunistic behaviour through calculative commitment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信