非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者的心电图模式和射血分数:一项横断面回顾性研究

Abdelhameed Elsayed, H. Kheirallah, Abdulaziz Alsuwayh, Ibrahim Osman
{"title":"非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者的心电图模式和射血分数:一项横断面回顾性研究","authors":"Abdelhameed Elsayed, H. Kheirallah, Abdulaziz Alsuwayh, Ibrahim Osman","doi":"10.2174/0102506882297515240320040938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe relationship between ECG changes in dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction (EF) is complex and poorly understood. Thus,\nthis study aimed to identify the most common patterns of ECG associated with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and their relationship to EF.\n\n\n\nA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between 2019 and 2022, including 100 consecutive patients with nonischemic dilated\ncardiomyopathy. ECG data were rate, axis, left (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB), first-degree heart block, premature ventricular\ncontractions, depth of S wave in leads V1 and V2, length of R wave in leads V2 and V6, the ratio of R/S in the lead V4, left ventricular\nhypertrophy (LVH), maximum R wave length in leads I, II, and III, poor R wave progression, ST-segment elevation, and T wave inversion.\n\n\n\nThe most common ECG pattern associated with cardiomyopathy was T-wave inversion (47%). The EF was 23.9± 8.87% in patients with LBBB\nand 25.5± 8.07% in patients without LBBB (P= 0.361). In patients with T-wave inversion, the EF was 23.4± 8.21%, and it was 26.28± 8.35% in\npatients without T-wave inversion (P= 0.086). In patients with LVH, the EF was 23.89± 7.84%, and it was 25.5± 8.66% in patients without LVH\n(P= 0.354). A negative nonsignificant correlation existed between SV1, SV2, RV2, RV6, R/S V4, and maximum R in I, II, III, and EF.\n\n\n\nThe study showed that T-wave inversion was the most common pattern associated with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The study provided\ninsight into the negative correlation between EF and SV1, SV2, RV2, RV6, R/S V4, and maximum R in I, II, and III, although it did not reach a\nsignificant level.\n","PeriodicalId":508641,"journal":{"name":"New Emirates Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrocardiographic Patterns and Ejection Fraction in Patients with\\nNonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Abdelhameed Elsayed, H. Kheirallah, Abdulaziz Alsuwayh, Ibrahim Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0102506882297515240320040938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe relationship between ECG changes in dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction (EF) is complex and poorly understood. Thus,\\nthis study aimed to identify the most common patterns of ECG associated with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and their relationship to EF.\\n\\n\\n\\nA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between 2019 and 2022, including 100 consecutive patients with nonischemic dilated\\ncardiomyopathy. ECG data were rate, axis, left (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB), first-degree heart block, premature ventricular\\ncontractions, depth of S wave in leads V1 and V2, length of R wave in leads V2 and V6, the ratio of R/S in the lead V4, left ventricular\\nhypertrophy (LVH), maximum R wave length in leads I, II, and III, poor R wave progression, ST-segment elevation, and T wave inversion.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe most common ECG pattern associated with cardiomyopathy was T-wave inversion (47%). The EF was 23.9± 8.87% in patients with LBBB\\nand 25.5± 8.07% in patients without LBBB (P= 0.361). In patients with T-wave inversion, the EF was 23.4± 8.21%, and it was 26.28± 8.35% in\\npatients without T-wave inversion (P= 0.086). In patients with LVH, the EF was 23.89± 7.84%, and it was 25.5± 8.66% in patients without LVH\\n(P= 0.354). A negative nonsignificant correlation existed between SV1, SV2, RV2, RV6, R/S V4, and maximum R in I, II, III, and EF.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe study showed that T-wave inversion was the most common pattern associated with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The study provided\\ninsight into the negative correlation between EF and SV1, SV2, RV2, RV6, R/S V4, and maximum R in I, II, and III, although it did not reach a\\nsignificant level.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Emirates Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Emirates Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0102506882297515240320040938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Emirates Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0102506882297515240320040938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩张型非缺血性心肌病的心电图变化与射血分数(EF)之间的关系十分复杂,人们对其了解甚少。因此,本研究旨在确定与扩张型非缺血性心肌病相关的最常见心电图模式及其与射血分数的关系。心电图数据包括心率、心轴、左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)和右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)、一级心脏传导阻滞、室性早搏、V1和V2导联的S波深度、V2和V6导联的R波长度、V4导联的R/S比值、左室肥厚(LVH)、I、II和III导联的最大R波长度、R波进展不佳、ST段抬高和T波倒置。与心肌病相关的最常见心电图模式是 T 波倒置(47%)。LBBB患者的EF值为23.9± 8.87%,无LBBB患者的EF值为25.5± 8.07%(P= 0.361)。T波倒置患者的EF为23.4± 8.21%,无T波倒置患者的EF为26.28± 8.35%(P= 0.086)。有 LVH 的患者的 EF 为 23.89±7.84%,无 LVH 的患者的 EF 为 25.5±8.66%(P= 0.354)。SV1、SV2、RV2、RV6、R/S V4、Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ期最大 R 与 EF 之间存在非显著负相关。该研究揭示了 EF 与 SV1、SV2、RV2、RV6、R/S V4 和 I、II、III 期最大 R 之间的负相关性,尽管未达到显著水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrocardiographic Patterns and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study
The relationship between ECG changes in dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction (EF) is complex and poorly understood. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most common patterns of ECG associated with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy and their relationship to EF. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between 2019 and 2022, including 100 consecutive patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. ECG data were rate, axis, left (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB), first-degree heart block, premature ventricular contractions, depth of S wave in leads V1 and V2, length of R wave in leads V2 and V6, the ratio of R/S in the lead V4, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), maximum R wave length in leads I, II, and III, poor R wave progression, ST-segment elevation, and T wave inversion. The most common ECG pattern associated with cardiomyopathy was T-wave inversion (47%). The EF was 23.9± 8.87% in patients with LBBB and 25.5± 8.07% in patients without LBBB (P= 0.361). In patients with T-wave inversion, the EF was 23.4± 8.21%, and it was 26.28± 8.35% in patients without T-wave inversion (P= 0.086). In patients with LVH, the EF was 23.89± 7.84%, and it was 25.5± 8.66% in patients without LVH (P= 0.354). A negative nonsignificant correlation existed between SV1, SV2, RV2, RV6, R/S V4, and maximum R in I, II, III, and EF. The study showed that T-wave inversion was the most common pattern associated with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The study provided insight into the negative correlation between EF and SV1, SV2, RV2, RV6, R/S V4, and maximum R in I, II, and III, although it did not reach a significant level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信