重复冲刺运动中的持续血流限制会增加外周而非全身的生理和知觉需求

James R. Mckee, Olivier Girard, Jeremiah J. Peiffer, Alasdair R. Dempsey, Kirsten Smedley, Brendan R. Scott
{"title":"重复冲刺运动中的持续血流限制会增加外周而非全身的生理和知觉需求","authors":"James R. Mckee,&nbsp;Olivier Girard,&nbsp;Jeremiah J. Peiffer,&nbsp;Alasdair R. Dempsey,&nbsp;Kirsten Smedley,&nbsp;Brendan R. Scott","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the impact of continuous blood flow restriction (BFR) during repeated-sprint exercise (RSE) on acute performance, peripheral, systemic physiological, and perceptual responses. In a randomized crossover design, 26 adult male semi-professional and amateur team-sport players completed two RSE sessions (3 sets of 5 × 5-s sprints with 25 s of passive recovery and 3 min of rest) with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion; excluding during between-set rest periods) or without (non-BFR). Mean and peak power output were significantly lower (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) during BFR compared to non-BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 0.85 and 0.77, respectively). Minimum tissue saturation index during the sprints and rest periods was significantly reduced (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 1.26 and 1.21, respectively). Electromyography root mean square was significantly decreased (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) for <i>biceps femoris</i> and <i>lateral gastrocnemius</i> muscles during BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 0.35 and 0.79, respectively), but remained unchanged for the <i>vastus lateralis</i> muscle in both conditions. Oxygen consumption and minute ventilation were significantly reduced (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) for BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 1.46 and 0.43, respectively). Perceived limb discomfort was significantly higher (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 0.78). No differences (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) in blood lactate concentration or rating of perceived exertion were observed between conditions. Blood flow-restricted RSE reduced performance and likely increased the physiological and perceptual stimulus for the periphery with greater reliance on anaerobic glycolysis, despite comparable or decreased systemic demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated-sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands\",\"authors\":\"James R. Mckee,&nbsp;Olivier Girard,&nbsp;Jeremiah J. Peiffer,&nbsp;Alasdair R. Dempsey,&nbsp;Kirsten Smedley,&nbsp;Brendan R. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examined the impact of continuous blood flow restriction (BFR) during repeated-sprint exercise (RSE) on acute performance, peripheral, systemic physiological, and perceptual responses. In a randomized crossover design, 26 adult male semi-professional and amateur team-sport players completed two RSE sessions (3 sets of 5 × 5-s sprints with 25 s of passive recovery and 3 min of rest) with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion; excluding during between-set rest periods) or without (non-BFR). Mean and peak power output were significantly lower (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) during BFR compared to non-BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 0.85 and 0.77, respectively). Minimum tissue saturation index during the sprints and rest periods was significantly reduced (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 1.26 and 1.21, respectively). Electromyography root mean square was significantly decreased (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) for <i>biceps femoris</i> and <i>lateral gastrocnemius</i> muscles during BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 0.35 and 0.79, respectively), but remained unchanged for the <i>vastus lateralis</i> muscle in both conditions. Oxygen consumption and minute ventilation were significantly reduced (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) for BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 1.46 and 0.43, respectively). Perceived limb discomfort was significantly higher (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for BFR (<i>d</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> = 0.78). No differences (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) in blood lactate concentration or rating of perceived exertion were observed between conditions. Blood flow-restricted RSE reduced performance and likely increased the physiological and perceptual stimulus for the periphery with greater reliance on anaerobic glycolysis, despite comparable or decreased systemic demands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12106\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在重复冲刺运动(RSE)过程中持续限制血流(BFR)对急性表现、外周、全身生理和知觉反应的影响。在随机交叉设计中,26 名成年男性半专业和业余团队运动选手完成了两次重复冲刺运动(3 组 5 × 5 秒的冲刺,25 秒的被动恢复和 3 分钟的休息),其中有连续 BFR(45% 的动脉闭塞;不包括两组之间的休息时间)或无 BFR(非 BFR)。在不同条件下观察到的平均和峰值功率输出明显低于(P 0.05)血液乳酸浓度或体力消耗等级。血流受限的 RSE 会降低运动表现,并可能增加对外周的生理和知觉刺激,更依赖于无氧糖酵解,尽管系统需求相当或有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated-sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands

Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated-sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands

This study examined the impact of continuous blood flow restriction (BFR) during repeated-sprint exercise (RSE) on acute performance, peripheral, systemic physiological, and perceptual responses. In a randomized crossover design, 26 adult male semi-professional and amateur team-sport players completed two RSE sessions (3 sets of 5 × 5-s sprints with 25 s of passive recovery and 3 min of rest) with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion; excluding during between-set rest periods) or without (non-BFR). Mean and peak power output were significantly lower (p < 0.001) during BFR compared to non-BFR (dz = 0.85 and 0.77, respectively). Minimum tissue saturation index during the sprints and rest periods was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) for BFR (dz = 1.26 and 1.21, respectively). Electromyography root mean square was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) for biceps femoris and lateral gastrocnemius muscles during BFR (dz = 0.35 and 0.79, respectively), but remained unchanged for the vastus lateralis muscle in both conditions. Oxygen consumption and minute ventilation were significantly reduced (both p < 0.01) for BFR (dz = 1.46 and 0.43, respectively). Perceived limb discomfort was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for BFR (dz = 0.78). No differences (p > 0.05) in blood lactate concentration or rating of perceived exertion were observed between conditions. Blood flow-restricted RSE reduced performance and likely increased the physiological and perceptual stimulus for the periphery with greater reliance on anaerobic glycolysis, despite comparable or decreased systemic demands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信