探索高等教育中教师(未来)的数字化评估实践:工具和模型开发

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Olga Viberg, Chantal Mutimukwe, Stefan Hrastinski, Teresa Cerratto-Pargman, Joakim Lilliesköld
{"title":"探索高等教育中教师(未来)的数字化评估实践:工具和模型开发","authors":"Olga Viberg,&nbsp;Chantal Mutimukwe,&nbsp;Stefan Hrastinski,&nbsp;Teresa Cerratto-Pargman,&nbsp;Joakim Lilliesköld","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital technologies are increasingly used in assessment. On the one hand, this use offers opportunities for teachers to practice assessment more effectively, and on the other hand, it brings challenges to the design of pedagogically sound and responsible digital assessment. There is a lack of validated instruments and models that explain, assess and support teachers' critical pedagogical practice of digital assessment. This explorative work first develops and validates a survey instrument to examine teachers' digital assessment practices. Secondly, we build a model to investigate to what extent teachers' pedagogical digital assessment knowledge is a foundation for the future of digital assessment (ie, authentic, accessible, automated, continuous and responsible). A total of 219 university teachers at a large European university participated in the survey study. Factor exploratory analysis and structural equation modelling were used to validate the reliability and validity of items and internal causal relations of factors. The results show the survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers' digital assessment practice in higher education. Teachers' pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of digital assessment is critical, while teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge seems to have a more limited impact on the future of digital assessment.\n </p>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"55 6","pages":"2597-2616"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13462","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring teachers' (future) digital assessment practices in higher education: Instrument and model development\",\"authors\":\"Olga Viberg,&nbsp;Chantal Mutimukwe,&nbsp;Stefan Hrastinski,&nbsp;Teresa Cerratto-Pargman,&nbsp;Joakim Lilliesköld\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.13462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital technologies are increasingly used in assessment. On the one hand, this use offers opportunities for teachers to practice assessment more effectively, and on the other hand, it brings challenges to the design of pedagogically sound and responsible digital assessment. There is a lack of validated instruments and models that explain, assess and support teachers' critical pedagogical practice of digital assessment. This explorative work first develops and validates a survey instrument to examine teachers' digital assessment practices. Secondly, we build a model to investigate to what extent teachers' pedagogical digital assessment knowledge is a foundation for the future of digital assessment (ie, authentic, accessible, automated, continuous and responsible). A total of 219 university teachers at a large European university participated in the survey study. Factor exploratory analysis and structural equation modelling were used to validate the reliability and validity of items and internal causal relations of factors. The results show the survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers' digital assessment practice in higher education. Teachers' pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of digital assessment is critical, while teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge seems to have a more limited impact on the future of digital assessment.\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"55 6\",\"pages\":\"2597-2616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13462\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13462\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13462","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字技术在评估中的应用越来越多。一方面,这种应用为教师提供了更有效地进行评估实践的机会,另一方面,也为 设计合理的、负责任的数字化评估教学带来了挑战。目前还缺乏有效的工具和模型来解释、评估和支持教师对数字化评估的批判性教学实践。这项探索性工作首先开发并验证了一种调查工具,以检查教师的数字评估实践。其次,我们建立了一个模型,研究教师的数字评估教学知识在多大程度上为未来的数字评估(即真实、无障碍、自动化、持续和负责任)奠定了基础。欧洲一所大型大学的 219 名大学教师参与了调查研究。调查采用了因子探索分析和结构方程模型来验证项目的信度和效度以及因子的内部因果关系。结果表明,该调查是评估高校教师数字评估实践的有效而可靠的工具。教师对数字化评估的教学知识和教学内容知识至关重要,而教师的技术教学知识似乎对数字化评估的未来影响较为有限。数字化技术在高等教育评估中的应用越来越多,教师是学习评估的关键利益相关者,数字化评估实践的变革性有限。教师对数字评估的教学法和教学内容知识对未来的数字评估至关重要。教师对数字评估的技术教学法知识对未来数字评估的影响较为有限。需要支持教师在高等教育中开展教学法数字评估实践。根据这项研究的成果,教育工作者、机构和政策制定者可以为设计和实施有效和负责任的数字评估实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring teachers' (future) digital assessment practices in higher education: Instrument and model development

Exploring teachers' (future) digital assessment practices in higher education: Instrument and model development

Digital technologies are increasingly used in assessment. On the one hand, this use offers opportunities for teachers to practice assessment more effectively, and on the other hand, it brings challenges to the design of pedagogically sound and responsible digital assessment. There is a lack of validated instruments and models that explain, assess and support teachers' critical pedagogical practice of digital assessment. This explorative work first develops and validates a survey instrument to examine teachers' digital assessment practices. Secondly, we build a model to investigate to what extent teachers' pedagogical digital assessment knowledge is a foundation for the future of digital assessment (ie, authentic, accessible, automated, continuous and responsible). A total of 219 university teachers at a large European university participated in the survey study. Factor exploratory analysis and structural equation modelling were used to validate the reliability and validity of items and internal causal relations of factors. The results show the survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers' digital assessment practice in higher education. Teachers' pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of digital assessment is critical, while teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge seems to have a more limited impact on the future of digital assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信