英国和美国公众对自动驾驶汽车的预期

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Chris Tennant , Jack Stilgoe , Sandra Vucevic , Sally Stares
{"title":"英国和美国公众对自动驾驶汽车的预期","authors":"Chris Tennant ,&nbsp;Jack Stilgoe ,&nbsp;Sandra Vucevic ,&nbsp;Sally Stares","doi":"10.1080/17450101.2024.2325386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Developers of self-driving vehicles (SDVs) work with a particular idea of a possible and desirable future. Members of the public may not share the assumptions on which this is based. In this paper we analyse free-text responses from surveys of UK (<em>n</em> = 4,860) and US (<em>n</em> = 1,890) publics, which ask respondents what springs to mind when they think of SDVs, and why they should or should not be developed. Responses (averaging a total 27 words per participant) tend to foreground safety hopes and, more regularly, concerns. Many respondents present alternative representations of relationships between the technology, other road users and the future. Rather than accepting a dominant approach to public engagement, which seeks to educate members of the public away from these views, we instead propose that these views should be seen as a source of social intelligence, with potential constructive contributions to building better transport systems. Anticipatory governance, if it is to be inclusive, should seek to understand and integrate public views rather than reject them as irrational or mutable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51457,"journal":{"name":"Mobilities","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages 292-309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public anticipations of self-driving vehicles in the UK and US\",\"authors\":\"Chris Tennant ,&nbsp;Jack Stilgoe ,&nbsp;Sandra Vucevic ,&nbsp;Sally Stares\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17450101.2024.2325386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Developers of self-driving vehicles (SDVs) work with a particular idea of a possible and desirable future. Members of the public may not share the assumptions on which this is based. In this paper we analyse free-text responses from surveys of UK (<em>n</em> = 4,860) and US (<em>n</em> = 1,890) publics, which ask respondents what springs to mind when they think of SDVs, and why they should or should not be developed. Responses (averaging a total 27 words per participant) tend to foreground safety hopes and, more regularly, concerns. Many respondents present alternative representations of relationships between the technology, other road users and the future. Rather than accepting a dominant approach to public engagement, which seeks to educate members of the public away from these views, we instead propose that these views should be seen as a source of social intelligence, with potential constructive contributions to building better transport systems. Anticipatory governance, if it is to be inclusive, should seek to understand and integrate public views rather than reject them as irrational or mutable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobilities\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 292-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1745010124000122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1745010124000122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动驾驶汽车(sdv)的开发人员对一个可能的、理想的未来有一个特定的想法。公众成员可能不同意这一观点所依据的假设。在本文中,我们分析了来自英国(n = 4,860)和美国(n = 1,890)公众调查的自由文本回复,这些调查询问受访者当他们想到sdv时脑海中浮现的是什么,以及为什么应该或不应该开发sdv。回答(平均每个参与者总共27个单词)倾向于强调安全希望,更常见的是担忧。许多受访者对技术、其他道路使用者和未来之间的关系提出了不同的看法。我们不接受主流的公众参与方式,即试图教育公众远离这些观点,而是建议将这些观点视为社会智慧的来源,对建设更好的交通系统有潜在的建设性贡献。预见性治理如果要具有包容性,就应该设法理解和综合公众意见,而不是将其视为不合理或易变而加以拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public anticipations of self-driving vehicles in the UK and US
Developers of self-driving vehicles (SDVs) work with a particular idea of a possible and desirable future. Members of the public may not share the assumptions on which this is based. In this paper we analyse free-text responses from surveys of UK (n = 4,860) and US (n = 1,890) publics, which ask respondents what springs to mind when they think of SDVs, and why they should or should not be developed. Responses (averaging a total 27 words per participant) tend to foreground safety hopes and, more regularly, concerns. Many respondents present alternative representations of relationships between the technology, other road users and the future. Rather than accepting a dominant approach to public engagement, which seeks to educate members of the public away from these views, we instead propose that these views should be seen as a source of social intelligence, with potential constructive contributions to building better transport systems. Anticipatory governance, if it is to be inclusive, should seek to understand and integrate public views rather than reject them as irrational or mutable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mobilities
Mobilities Multiple-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Mobilities examines both the large-scale movements of people, objects, capital, and information across the world, as well as more local processes of daily transportation, movement through public and private spaces, and the travel of material things in everyday life. Recent developments in transportation and communications infrastructures, along with new social and cultural practices of mobility, present new challenges for the coordination and governance of mobilities and for the protection of mobility rights and access. This has elicited many new research methods and theories relevant for understanding the connections between diverse mobilities and immobilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信