表观相似性和独特性有利于植物入侵

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Daniel S. Park, Kimberly M. Huynh, Xiao Feng
{"title":"表观相似性和独特性有利于植物入侵","authors":"Daniel S. Park,&nbsp;Kimberly M. Huynh,&nbsp;Xiao Feng","doi":"10.1111/geb.13839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Darwin posited that invaders similar to native species are less likely to be successful due to competitive exclusion. A key axis across which such competition occurs across angiosperms is the timing of flowering, or reproductive phenology. It has been hypothesized that temporal isolation facilitates the establishment of introduced species. However, our knowledge of how the timing of flowering may influence invasion success is lacking at broader geographic and larger taxonomic scales. To address this impasse, we investigated: (i) how flowering phenology differs between native and non-native species; (ii) whether the flowering phenology of successful invaders is distinct from native taxa; and (iii) whether invasive species tend to be more closely related to natives than other less successful, non-invasive introduced species are.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>California, USA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Angiosperms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compiled phenological data for over 6000 angiosperm species across California, a highly invaded biodiversity hotspot, from published flora. Using these data, we assessed the degree of phenological and phylogenetic similarity among native, non-invasive introduced, and invasive species. We also examined how this similarity varies with climate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both non-invasive introduced and invasive species were more phenologically and phylogenetically distant from natives than natives were from each other. However, invasive plants tend to be more similar to native species in terms of flowering phenology and phylogenetic relationships than non-invasive introduced species. Further, the degree of similarity between native and non-native species was mediated by climate, where phenological and phylogenetic similarities were greater in cooler regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Together, our results demonstrate that both similarity and distinctiveness can facilitate plant invasions and that invaders just similar enough to the native flora are more likely to be successful.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13839","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenological similarity and distinctiveness facilitate plant invasions\",\"authors\":\"Daniel S. Park,&nbsp;Kimberly M. Huynh,&nbsp;Xiao Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Darwin posited that invaders similar to native species are less likely to be successful due to competitive exclusion. A key axis across which such competition occurs across angiosperms is the timing of flowering, or reproductive phenology. It has been hypothesized that temporal isolation facilitates the establishment of introduced species. However, our knowledge of how the timing of flowering may influence invasion success is lacking at broader geographic and larger taxonomic scales. To address this impasse, we investigated: (i) how flowering phenology differs between native and non-native species; (ii) whether the flowering phenology of successful invaders is distinct from native taxa; and (iii) whether invasive species tend to be more closely related to natives than other less successful, non-invasive introduced species are.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>California, USA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Present.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Angiosperms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compiled phenological data for over 6000 angiosperm species across California, a highly invaded biodiversity hotspot, from published flora. Using these data, we assessed the degree of phenological and phylogenetic similarity among native, non-invasive introduced, and invasive species. We also examined how this similarity varies with climate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both non-invasive introduced and invasive species were more phenologically and phylogenetically distant from natives than natives were from each other. However, invasive plants tend to be more similar to native species in terms of flowering phenology and phylogenetic relationships than non-invasive introduced species. Further, the degree of similarity between native and non-native species was mediated by climate, where phenological and phylogenetic similarities were greater in cooler regions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Together, our results demonstrate that both similarity and distinctiveness can facilitate plant invasions and that invaders just similar enough to the native flora are more likely to be successful.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13839\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13839\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13839","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的达尔文认为,由于竞争排斥,与本地物种相似的入侵者不太可能成功。在被子植物中,发生这种竞争的一个关键轴心是开花时间或生殖物候学。据推测,时间上的隔离有利于引入物种的建立。然而,在更广泛的地理范围和更大的分类尺度上,我们对开花时间如何影响入侵成功率还缺乏了解。为了打破这一僵局,我们研究了:(i)本地物种和非本地物种的开花物候有何不同;(ii)成功入侵者的开花物候是否有别于本地类群;(iii)入侵物种与本地物种的亲缘关系是否往往比其他不太成功的非入侵引入物种更密切。地点美国加利福尼亚州.时间段目前.主要研究分类群被子植物.方法我们从已发表的植物群中汇编了加利福尼亚州(生物多样性高度入侵的热点地区)6000多个被子植物物种的物候数据。利用这些数据,我们评估了本地物种、非入侵引进物种和入侵物种之间的物候学和系统发育相似程度。结果非入侵性引进物种和入侵物种在物候学和系统发育上与本地物种的距离都比本地物种之间的距离要大。然而,就开花物候学和系统发育关系而言,外来入侵植物往往比非外来入侵物种更接近本地物种。此外,本地物种与非本地物种之间的相似程度还受气候的影响,在气候较凉爽的地区,物候学和系统发育的相似程度更高。主要结论我们的研究结果表明,相似性和独特性都能促进植物入侵,与本地植物区系足够相似的入侵者更有可能获得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Phenological similarity and distinctiveness facilitate plant invasions

Phenological similarity and distinctiveness facilitate plant invasions

Aim

Darwin posited that invaders similar to native species are less likely to be successful due to competitive exclusion. A key axis across which such competition occurs across angiosperms is the timing of flowering, or reproductive phenology. It has been hypothesized that temporal isolation facilitates the establishment of introduced species. However, our knowledge of how the timing of flowering may influence invasion success is lacking at broader geographic and larger taxonomic scales. To address this impasse, we investigated: (i) how flowering phenology differs between native and non-native species; (ii) whether the flowering phenology of successful invaders is distinct from native taxa; and (iii) whether invasive species tend to be more closely related to natives than other less successful, non-invasive introduced species are.

Location

California, USA.

Time Period

Present.

Major Taxa Studied

Angiosperms.

Methods

We compiled phenological data for over 6000 angiosperm species across California, a highly invaded biodiversity hotspot, from published flora. Using these data, we assessed the degree of phenological and phylogenetic similarity among native, non-invasive introduced, and invasive species. We also examined how this similarity varies with climate.

Results

Both non-invasive introduced and invasive species were more phenologically and phylogenetically distant from natives than natives were from each other. However, invasive plants tend to be more similar to native species in terms of flowering phenology and phylogenetic relationships than non-invasive introduced species. Further, the degree of similarity between native and non-native species was mediated by climate, where phenological and phylogenetic similarities were greater in cooler regions.

Main Conclusions

Together, our results demonstrate that both similarity and distinctiveness can facilitate plant invasions and that invaders just similar enough to the native flora are more likely to be successful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信