具有替代化学成分的低应力聚合物网络的松弛机制

Steven H. Lewis BS, MS, Ana Paula P. Fugolin DDS, MS, PhD, Anissa Bartolome BS, Carmem S. Pfeifer DDS, PhD
{"title":"具有替代化学成分的低应力聚合物网络的松弛机制","authors":"Steven H. Lewis BS, MS,&nbsp;Ana Paula P. Fugolin DDS, MS, PhD,&nbsp;Anissa Bartolome BS,&nbsp;Carmem S. Pfeifer DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jfscie.2024.100033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Low-stress resin-based composites (RBCs) are available to the clinician, some using stress relaxation mechanisms on the basis of network reconfiguration, modulated photopolymerization, or chain transfer reactions. This study investigated those materials in terms of their overall stress relaxation and their relationship with polymerization kinetics and compared them with an experimental low-stress thiourethane (TU) material.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Experimental composites (bisphenol-A-diglycidyl dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate [50:30:20 mass ratio]; 70% barium aluminosilicate filler; camphoroquinone, ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol [0.2:0.8:0.2% by mass]) with or without TU oligomer (synthesized in-house) and commercial composites (SureFil SDR Flow+ Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base [SDR Flow+] [Dentsply Sirona], Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative [3M ESPE], and Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative [3M ESPE]) were tested. Polymerization kinetics (near-infrared) and polymerization stress (Bioman) were evaluated during light-emitting diode photoactivation at 100 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 seconds. Stress relaxation was assessed using dynamic mechanical analysis. Data were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The kinetic profiles of all materials differed substantially, including more than a 2-fold difference in the rate of polymerization between TU-modified composites and SDR Flow+. TU-modified RBCs also showed more than a 2-fold higher conversion at the onset of deceleration vs the experimental control and commercial materials. RBCs that used stress reduction mechanisms showed at least a 34% reduction in polymerization stress compared with the controls and significantly reduced the amount of early-onset stress buildup. SDR Flow+ and the TU-modified RBCs showed the greatest amount of viscoelastic stress relaxation postpolymerization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The novel TU-modified materials showed similar or improved performance compared with commercial low-stress RBCs, showing that chain transfer may be a promising strategy for stress reduction, both during polymerization and after polymerization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73530,"journal":{"name":"JADA foundational science","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X24000033/pdfft?md5=fe849c9ccb34e08cda9da7e3b7657d3e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772414X24000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relaxation mechanisms in low-stress polymer networks with alternative chemistries\",\"authors\":\"Steven H. Lewis BS, MS,&nbsp;Ana Paula P. Fugolin DDS, MS, PhD,&nbsp;Anissa Bartolome BS,&nbsp;Carmem S. Pfeifer DDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfscie.2024.100033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Low-stress resin-based composites (RBCs) are available to the clinician, some using stress relaxation mechanisms on the basis of network reconfiguration, modulated photopolymerization, or chain transfer reactions. This study investigated those materials in terms of their overall stress relaxation and their relationship with polymerization kinetics and compared them with an experimental low-stress thiourethane (TU) material.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Experimental composites (bisphenol-A-diglycidyl dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate [50:30:20 mass ratio]; 70% barium aluminosilicate filler; camphoroquinone, ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol [0.2:0.8:0.2% by mass]) with or without TU oligomer (synthesized in-house) and commercial composites (SureFil SDR Flow+ Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base [SDR Flow+] [Dentsply Sirona], Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative [3M ESPE], and Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative [3M ESPE]) were tested. Polymerization kinetics (near-infrared) and polymerization stress (Bioman) were evaluated during light-emitting diode photoactivation at 100 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 seconds. Stress relaxation was assessed using dynamic mechanical analysis. Data were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The kinetic profiles of all materials differed substantially, including more than a 2-fold difference in the rate of polymerization between TU-modified composites and SDR Flow+. TU-modified RBCs also showed more than a 2-fold higher conversion at the onset of deceleration vs the experimental control and commercial materials. RBCs that used stress reduction mechanisms showed at least a 34% reduction in polymerization stress compared with the controls and significantly reduced the amount of early-onset stress buildup. SDR Flow+ and the TU-modified RBCs showed the greatest amount of viscoelastic stress relaxation postpolymerization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The novel TU-modified materials showed similar or improved performance compared with commercial low-stress RBCs, showing that chain transfer may be a promising strategy for stress reduction, both during polymerization and after polymerization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JADA foundational science\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X24000033/pdfft?md5=fe849c9ccb34e08cda9da7e3b7657d3e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772414X24000033-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JADA foundational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X24000033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JADA foundational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X24000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景临床医生可以使用低应力树脂基复合材料(RBC),其中一些材料采用了基于网络重构、调制光聚合或链转移反应的应力松弛机制。本研究从整体应力松弛及其与聚合动力学的关系方面对这些材料进行了研究,并将它们与实验性低应力硫代聚氨酯(TU)材料进行了比较。方法实验复合材料(双酚 A-二缩水甘油二甲基丙烯酸酯、聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯和三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯[质量比为 50:30:20];70% 的铝硅酸盐钡填料;樟脑醌、4-二甲氨基苯甲酸乙酯和 2,6-二叔丁基-4-甲基苯酚[0.测试了含有或不含 TU 低聚物(内部合成)的复合材料(SureFil SDR Flow+ 后牙批量填充可流动基底 [SDR Flow+] [Dentsply Sirona]、Filtek Bulk Fill 后牙修复体 [3M ESPE] 和 Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative [3M ESPE])和商用复合材料(SureFil SDR Flow+ 后牙批量填充可流动基底 [SDR Flow+] [Dentsply Sirona])。聚合动力学(近红外)和聚合应力(Bioman)在 100 mW/cm2 的发光二极管光激活过程中进行了 20 秒的评估。应力松弛采用动态机械分析法进行评估。结果所有材料的动力学曲线差异很大,其中 TU 改性复合材料和 SDR Flow+ 的聚合速率相差 2 倍多。经 TU 改性的 RBC 在开始减速时的转化率也比实验对照组和商用材料高出 2 倍多。采用应力降低机制的 RBC 与对照组相比,聚合应力至少降低了 34%,并显著降低了早期应力积聚量。结论与商用低应力 RBC 相比,新型 TU 改性材料显示出相似或更好的性能,这表明链转移可能是聚合期间和聚合之后减少应力的一种有前途的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relaxation mechanisms in low-stress polymer networks with alternative chemistries

Relaxation mechanisms in low-stress polymer networks with alternative chemistries

Background

Low-stress resin-based composites (RBCs) are available to the clinician, some using stress relaxation mechanisms on the basis of network reconfiguration, modulated photopolymerization, or chain transfer reactions. This study investigated those materials in terms of their overall stress relaxation and their relationship with polymerization kinetics and compared them with an experimental low-stress thiourethane (TU) material.

Methods

Experimental composites (bisphenol-A-diglycidyl dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate [50:30:20 mass ratio]; 70% barium aluminosilicate filler; camphoroquinone, ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate, and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol [0.2:0.8:0.2% by mass]) with or without TU oligomer (synthesized in-house) and commercial composites (SureFil SDR Flow+ Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base [SDR Flow+] [Dentsply Sirona], Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative [3M ESPE], and Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative [3M ESPE]) were tested. Polymerization kinetics (near-infrared) and polymerization stress (Bioman) were evaluated during light-emitting diode photoactivation at 100 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds. Stress relaxation was assessed using dynamic mechanical analysis. Data were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α = 0.05).

Results

The kinetic profiles of all materials differed substantially, including more than a 2-fold difference in the rate of polymerization between TU-modified composites and SDR Flow+. TU-modified RBCs also showed more than a 2-fold higher conversion at the onset of deceleration vs the experimental control and commercial materials. RBCs that used stress reduction mechanisms showed at least a 34% reduction in polymerization stress compared with the controls and significantly reduced the amount of early-onset stress buildup. SDR Flow+ and the TU-modified RBCs showed the greatest amount of viscoelastic stress relaxation postpolymerization.

Conclusions

The novel TU-modified materials showed similar or improved performance compared with commercial low-stress RBCs, showing that chain transfer may be a promising strategy for stress reduction, both during polymerization and after polymerization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JADA foundational science
JADA foundational science Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信