Zefeng Qi , Chen Zhang , Yuan Wang , Liying Ping , Benhan Gao , Tao Sun , Hongyu Zhang
{"title":"废弃食用油的未来及其碳和经济效益--汽车能源视角","authors":"Zefeng Qi , Chen Zhang , Yuan Wang , Liying Ping , Benhan Gao , Tao Sun , Hongyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a crucial energy carrier, waste cooking oil poses a significant threat to land and water resources. Furthermore, there is a risk of its reintroduction into the restaurant system, posing a direct threat to public health. Hence, converting waste cooking oil into clean energy has emerged as a pressing concern. This study compares the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and economic benefits of two pathways applied to automotive energy consumption——the waste cooking oil produced biodiesel pathway and the waste cooking oil mixed with coal for power generation pathway. The results show that for both diesel and electric versions of the same brand of vehicles, the CO<sub>2</sub> emission of an electric vehicle using waste cooking oil mixed coal produced electricity is 0.181 kg/km, which is a 26.12% reduction compared to a diesel vehicle using waste cooking oil converted to biodiesel. Consumers appreciate the low price of electricity. However, for producers, the waste cooking oil produced biodiesel pathway demonstrates superior economic benefits. At the current market price, converting waste cooking oil into biodiesel will result in a net gain of 112.89 billion Yuan for the producer, whereas the waste cooking oil mixed with coal for power generation pathway will result in only 2.08 billion Yuan in net gain. This disparity is primarily attributed to the lower electricity prices for electric vehicles. To encourage the widespread adoption of waste cooking oil energization technologies, Chinese government can raise electricity prices for electric vehicles to a minimum of 1.599 Yuan/kW·h, ensuring equal net gains in both pathways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The future of waste cooking oil and its carbon and economic benefits——An automotive energy perspective\",\"authors\":\"Zefeng Qi , Chen Zhang , Yuan Wang , Liying Ping , Benhan Gao , Tao Sun , Hongyu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As a crucial energy carrier, waste cooking oil poses a significant threat to land and water resources. Furthermore, there is a risk of its reintroduction into the restaurant system, posing a direct threat to public health. Hence, converting waste cooking oil into clean energy has emerged as a pressing concern. This study compares the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and economic benefits of two pathways applied to automotive energy consumption——the waste cooking oil produced biodiesel pathway and the waste cooking oil mixed with coal for power generation pathway. The results show that for both diesel and electric versions of the same brand of vehicles, the CO<sub>2</sub> emission of an electric vehicle using waste cooking oil mixed coal produced electricity is 0.181 kg/km, which is a 26.12% reduction compared to a diesel vehicle using waste cooking oil converted to biodiesel. Consumers appreciate the low price of electricity. However, for producers, the waste cooking oil produced biodiesel pathway demonstrates superior economic benefits. At the current market price, converting waste cooking oil into biodiesel will result in a net gain of 112.89 billion Yuan for the producer, whereas the waste cooking oil mixed with coal for power generation pathway will result in only 2.08 billion Yuan in net gain. This disparity is primarily attributed to the lower electricity prices for electric vehicles. To encourage the widespread adoption of waste cooking oil energization technologies, Chinese government can raise electricity prices for electric vehicles to a minimum of 1.599 Yuan/kW·h, ensuring equal net gains in both pathways.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424001570\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424001570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The future of waste cooking oil and its carbon and economic benefits——An automotive energy perspective
As a crucial energy carrier, waste cooking oil poses a significant threat to land and water resources. Furthermore, there is a risk of its reintroduction into the restaurant system, posing a direct threat to public health. Hence, converting waste cooking oil into clean energy has emerged as a pressing concern. This study compares the CO2 emissions and economic benefits of two pathways applied to automotive energy consumption——the waste cooking oil produced biodiesel pathway and the waste cooking oil mixed with coal for power generation pathway. The results show that for both diesel and electric versions of the same brand of vehicles, the CO2 emission of an electric vehicle using waste cooking oil mixed coal produced electricity is 0.181 kg/km, which is a 26.12% reduction compared to a diesel vehicle using waste cooking oil converted to biodiesel. Consumers appreciate the low price of electricity. However, for producers, the waste cooking oil produced biodiesel pathway demonstrates superior economic benefits. At the current market price, converting waste cooking oil into biodiesel will result in a net gain of 112.89 billion Yuan for the producer, whereas the waste cooking oil mixed with coal for power generation pathway will result in only 2.08 billion Yuan in net gain. This disparity is primarily attributed to the lower electricity prices for electric vehicles. To encourage the widespread adoption of waste cooking oil energization technologies, Chinese government can raise electricity prices for electric vehicles to a minimum of 1.599 Yuan/kW·h, ensuring equal net gains in both pathways.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.