探索 PRx 时间趋势的不确定性

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Erta Beqiri , Michal M. Placek , Ka Hing Chu , Joseph Donnelly , Giada Cucciolini , Virginia Motroni , Claudia A. Smith , Marek Czosnyka , Peter Hutchinson , Peter Smielewski
{"title":"探索 PRx 时间趋势的不确定性","authors":"Erta Beqiri ,&nbsp;Michal M. Placek ,&nbsp;Ka Hing Chu ,&nbsp;Joseph Donnelly ,&nbsp;Giada Cucciolini ,&nbsp;Virginia Motroni ,&nbsp;Claudia A. Smith ,&nbsp;Marek Czosnyka ,&nbsp;Peter Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Peter Smielewski","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>PRx can be used as surrogate measure of Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. PRx can provide means for individualising cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets, such as CPPopt. However, a recent Delphi consensus of clinicians concluded that consensus could not be reached on the accuracy, reliability, and validation of any current CA assessment method.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>We aimed to quantify the short-term uncertainty of PRx time-trends and to relate this to other physiological measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) high-resolution recordings of 911 TBI patients were processed with ICM + software. Hourly values of metrics that describe the variability within modalities derived from ABP, ICP and EtCO<sub>2</sub>, were calculated for the first 24h of neuromonitoring. Generalized additive models were used to describe the time trend of the variability in PRx. Linear correlations were studied for describing the relationship between PRx variability and the other physiological modalities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The time profile of variability of PRx decreases over the first 12h and was higher for average PRx ∼0. Increased variability of PRx was not linearly linked with average ABP, ICP, or CPP. For coherence between slow waves of ABP and ICP &gt;0.7, the variability in PRx decreased (R = −0.47, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>PRx is a highly variable parameter. PRx short-term dispersion was not related to average ICP, ABP or CPP. The determinants of uncertainty of PRx should be investigated to improve reliability of individualised CA assessment in TBI patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 102795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000511/pdfft?md5=5f136c6605137604530aac354e2b366c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000511-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of uncertainty of PRx time trends\",\"authors\":\"Erta Beqiri ,&nbsp;Michal M. Placek ,&nbsp;Ka Hing Chu ,&nbsp;Joseph Donnelly ,&nbsp;Giada Cucciolini ,&nbsp;Virginia Motroni ,&nbsp;Claudia A. Smith ,&nbsp;Marek Czosnyka ,&nbsp;Peter Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Peter Smielewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>PRx can be used as surrogate measure of Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. PRx can provide means for individualising cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets, such as CPPopt. However, a recent Delphi consensus of clinicians concluded that consensus could not be reached on the accuracy, reliability, and validation of any current CA assessment method.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>We aimed to quantify the short-term uncertainty of PRx time-trends and to relate this to other physiological measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>) high-resolution recordings of 911 TBI patients were processed with ICM + software. Hourly values of metrics that describe the variability within modalities derived from ABP, ICP and EtCO<sub>2</sub>, were calculated for the first 24h of neuromonitoring. Generalized additive models were used to describe the time trend of the variability in PRx. Linear correlations were studied for describing the relationship between PRx variability and the other physiological modalities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The time profile of variability of PRx decreases over the first 12h and was higher for average PRx ∼0. Increased variability of PRx was not linearly linked with average ABP, ICP, or CPP. For coherence between slow waves of ABP and ICP &gt;0.7, the variability in PRx decreased (R = −0.47, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>PRx is a highly variable parameter. PRx short-term dispersion was not related to average ICP, ABP or CPP. The determinants of uncertainty of PRx should be investigated to improve reliability of individualised CA assessment in TBI patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000511/pdfft?md5=5f136c6605137604530aac354e2b366c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000511-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 PRx 可用作创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者脑自主调节(CA)的替代测量指标。PRx 可为个体化脑灌注压 (CPP) 目标(如 CPPopt)提供方法。研究问题我们旨在量化 PRx 时间趋势的短期不确定性,并将其与其他生理测量结果联系起来。材料和方法使用 ICM + 软件处理了 911 名 TBI 患者的颅压 (ICP)、动脉血压 (ABP)、潮气末二氧化碳 (EtCO2) 高分辨率记录。根据 ABP、ICP 和 EtCO2 计算了神经监测头 24 小时的每小时度量值,这些值描述了各种模式内的变异性。使用广义加性模型来描述 PRx 变异的时间趋势。研究了线性相关关系,以描述 PRx 变异性与其他生理模式之间的关系。结果 PRx 变异性的时间曲线在前 12 小时内下降,平均 PRx ∼ 0 时变异性较高。当 ABP 和 ICP 的慢波之间的一致性为 0.7 时,PRx 的变异性降低(R = -0.47,p <0.001)。PRx 短期离散度与平均 ICP、ABP 或 CPP 无关。应研究 PRx 不确定性的决定因素,以提高对创伤性脑损伤患者进行个体化 CA 评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of uncertainty of PRx time trends

Introduction

PRx can be used as surrogate measure of Cerebral Autoregulation (CA) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. PRx can provide means for individualising cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets, such as CPPopt. However, a recent Delphi consensus of clinicians concluded that consensus could not be reached on the accuracy, reliability, and validation of any current CA assessment method.

Research question

We aimed to quantify the short-term uncertainty of PRx time-trends and to relate this to other physiological measurements.

Material and methods

Intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) high-resolution recordings of 911 TBI patients were processed with ICM + software. Hourly values of metrics that describe the variability within modalities derived from ABP, ICP and EtCO2, were calculated for the first 24h of neuromonitoring. Generalized additive models were used to describe the time trend of the variability in PRx. Linear correlations were studied for describing the relationship between PRx variability and the other physiological modalities.

Results

The time profile of variability of PRx decreases over the first 12h and was higher for average PRx ∼0. Increased variability of PRx was not linearly linked with average ABP, ICP, or CPP. For coherence between slow waves of ABP and ICP >0.7, the variability in PRx decreased (R = −0.47, p < 0.001).

Discussion and conclusion

PRx is a highly variable parameter. PRx short-term dispersion was not related to average ICP, ABP or CPP. The determinants of uncertainty of PRx should be investigated to improve reliability of individualised CA assessment in TBI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信