利用免费提供的卫星图像和气象数据对土壤水分探头进行田间外推法

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. G. V. Bramley, E. M. Perry, J. Richetti, A. F. Colaço, D. J. Mowat, C. E. M. Ratcliff, R. A. Lawes
{"title":"利用免费提供的卫星图像和气象数据对土壤水分探头进行田间外推法","authors":"R. G. V. Bramley, E. M. Perry, J. Richetti, A. F. Colaço, D. J. Mowat, C. E. M. Ratcliff, R. A. Lawes","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10138-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recognition of the importance of soil moisture information to the optimisation of water-limited dryland cereal production has led to Australian growers being encouraged to make use of soil moisture sensors. However, irrespective of the merits of different sensing technologies, only a small soil volume is sensed, raising questions as to the utility of such sensors in broadacre cropping, especially given spatial variability in soil water holding capacity. Here, using data collected from contrasting sites in South Australia and Western Australia over two seasons, during which either wheat or barley were grown, we describe a method for extrapolating soil moisture information away from the location of a probe using freely-available NDVI time series and weather data as covariates. Relationships between soil moisture probe data, cumulative NDVI (ΣNDVI), cumulative net precipitation (ΣNP) and seasonal growing degree days (GDD) were significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). In turn, these could be used to predict soil moisture status for any location within a field on any date following crop emergence. However, differences in ΣNDVI between different within-field zones did not fully explain differences in the soil moisture from multiple sensors located in these zones, resulting in different calibrations being required for each sensor or zone and a relatively low accuracy of prediction of measured soil moisture (R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> ~ 0.4–0.7) which may not be sufficient to support targeted agronomic decision-making. The results also suggest that at any location within a field, the range of variation in soil moisture status down the soil profile on any given date will present as greater than the spatial variation in soil moisture across the field on that date. Accordingly, we conclude that, in dryland cereal cropping, the major value in soil moisture sensors arises from an enhanced ability to compare seasons and to relate similarities and differences between seasons as a guide to decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Within-field extrapolation away from a soil moisture probe using freely available satellite imagery and weather data\",\"authors\":\"R. G. V. Bramley, E. M. Perry, J. Richetti, A. F. Colaço, D. J. Mowat, C. E. M. Ratcliff, R. A. Lawes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-024-10138-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recognition of the importance of soil moisture information to the optimisation of water-limited dryland cereal production has led to Australian growers being encouraged to make use of soil moisture sensors. However, irrespective of the merits of different sensing technologies, only a small soil volume is sensed, raising questions as to the utility of such sensors in broadacre cropping, especially given spatial variability in soil water holding capacity. Here, using data collected from contrasting sites in South Australia and Western Australia over two seasons, during which either wheat or barley were grown, we describe a method for extrapolating soil moisture information away from the location of a probe using freely-available NDVI time series and weather data as covariates. Relationships between soil moisture probe data, cumulative NDVI (ΣNDVI), cumulative net precipitation (ΣNP) and seasonal growing degree days (GDD) were significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). In turn, these could be used to predict soil moisture status for any location within a field on any date following crop emergence. However, differences in ΣNDVI between different within-field zones did not fully explain differences in the soil moisture from multiple sensors located in these zones, resulting in different calibrations being required for each sensor or zone and a relatively low accuracy of prediction of measured soil moisture (R<sup>2</sup><sub>adj</sub> ~ 0.4–0.7) which may not be sufficient to support targeted agronomic decision-making. The results also suggest that at any location within a field, the range of variation in soil moisture status down the soil profile on any given date will present as greater than the spatial variation in soil moisture across the field on that date. Accordingly, we conclude that, in dryland cereal cropping, the major value in soil moisture sensors arises from an enhanced ability to compare seasons and to relate similarities and differences between seasons as a guide to decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10138-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10138-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于认识到土壤水分信息对优化水分有限的旱地谷物生产的重要性,澳大利亚鼓励种植者使用土壤水分传感器。然而,无论不同传感技术的优点如何,传感到的土壤量都很小,这就对此类传感器在大面积种植中的实用性提出了质疑,特别是考虑到土壤持水量的空间变化。在此,我们利用从南澳大利亚州和西澳大利亚州两季种植小麦或大麦的不同地点收集到的数据,介绍了一种利用免费提供的 NDVI 时间序列和天气数据作为协变量,推断探头位置以外的土壤水分信息的方法。土壤水分探针数据、累积净植被指数 (ΣNDVI)、累积净降水量 (ΣNP) 和季节性生长度日 (GDD) 之间的关系显著(P < 0.0001)。反过来,这些数据可用于预测作物出苗后任何日期田间任何位置的土壤水分状况。然而,田间不同区域之间的 ΣNDVI 差异并不能完全解释这些区域内多个传感器所测土壤湿度的差异,因此每个传感器或区域需要进行不同的校准,而且所测土壤湿度的预测精度相对较低(R2adj ~ 0.4-0.7),可能不足以支持有针对性的农艺决策。结果还表明,在田间的任何位置,土壤水分状况在任何给定日期沿土壤剖面的变化范围都会大于该日期整个田间土壤水分的空间变化。因此,我们得出结论:在旱地谷物种植中,土壤水分传感器的主要价值来自于提高比较季节的能力,以及将季节之间的异同联系起来作为决策指导的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Within-field extrapolation away from a soil moisture probe using freely available satellite imagery and weather data

Recognition of the importance of soil moisture information to the optimisation of water-limited dryland cereal production has led to Australian growers being encouraged to make use of soil moisture sensors. However, irrespective of the merits of different sensing technologies, only a small soil volume is sensed, raising questions as to the utility of such sensors in broadacre cropping, especially given spatial variability in soil water holding capacity. Here, using data collected from contrasting sites in South Australia and Western Australia over two seasons, during which either wheat or barley were grown, we describe a method for extrapolating soil moisture information away from the location of a probe using freely-available NDVI time series and weather data as covariates. Relationships between soil moisture probe data, cumulative NDVI (ΣNDVI), cumulative net precipitation (ΣNP) and seasonal growing degree days (GDD) were significant (P < 0.0001). In turn, these could be used to predict soil moisture status for any location within a field on any date following crop emergence. However, differences in ΣNDVI between different within-field zones did not fully explain differences in the soil moisture from multiple sensors located in these zones, resulting in different calibrations being required for each sensor or zone and a relatively low accuracy of prediction of measured soil moisture (R2adj ~ 0.4–0.7) which may not be sufficient to support targeted agronomic decision-making. The results also suggest that at any location within a field, the range of variation in soil moisture status down the soil profile on any given date will present as greater than the spatial variation in soil moisture across the field on that date. Accordingly, we conclude that, in dryland cereal cropping, the major value in soil moisture sensors arises from an enhanced ability to compare seasons and to relate similarities and differences between seasons as a guide to decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信