非洲地区温室气体预算(2010-2019 年)

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yolandi Ernst, Sally Archibald, Heiko Balzter, Frederic Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Carlos Gonzalez Fischer, Benjamin Gaubert, Thomas Higginbottom, Steven Higgins, Shakirudeen Lawal, Fabrice Lacroix, Ronny Lauerwald, Mauro Lourenco, Carola Martens, Anteneh G. Mengistu, Lutz Merbold, Edward Mitchard, Mthokozisi Moyo, Hannah Nguyen, Michael O’Sullivan, Pedro Rodríguez-Veiga, Thais Rosan, Judith Rosentreter, Casey Ryan, Simon Scheiter, Stephen Sitch, Nicola Stevens, Torbern Tagesson, Hanqin Tian, Mengjia Wang, Joel S. Woon, Bo Zheng, Yong Zhou, Robert J. Scholes
{"title":"非洲地区温室气体预算(2010-2019 年)","authors":"Yolandi Ernst,&nbsp;Sally Archibald,&nbsp;Heiko Balzter,&nbsp;Frederic Chevallier,&nbsp;Philippe Ciais,&nbsp;Carlos Gonzalez Fischer,&nbsp;Benjamin Gaubert,&nbsp;Thomas Higginbottom,&nbsp;Steven Higgins,&nbsp;Shakirudeen Lawal,&nbsp;Fabrice Lacroix,&nbsp;Ronny Lauerwald,&nbsp;Mauro Lourenco,&nbsp;Carola Martens,&nbsp;Anteneh G. Mengistu,&nbsp;Lutz Merbold,&nbsp;Edward Mitchard,&nbsp;Mthokozisi Moyo,&nbsp;Hannah Nguyen,&nbsp;Michael O’Sullivan,&nbsp;Pedro Rodríguez-Veiga,&nbsp;Thais Rosan,&nbsp;Judith Rosentreter,&nbsp;Casey Ryan,&nbsp;Simon Scheiter,&nbsp;Stephen Sitch,&nbsp;Nicola Stevens,&nbsp;Torbern Tagesson,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian,&nbsp;Mengjia Wang,&nbsp;Joel S. Woon,&nbsp;Bo Zheng,&nbsp;Yong Zhou,&nbsp;Robert J. Scholes","doi":"10.1029/2023GB008016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As part of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Phase 2 (RECCAP2) project, we developed a comprehensive African Greenhouse gases (GHG) budget covering 2000 to 2019 (RECCAP1 and RECCAP2 time periods), and assessed uncertainties and trends over time. We compared bottom-up process-based models, data-driven remotely sensed products, and national GHG inventories with top-down atmospheric inversions, accounting also for lateral fluxes. We incorporated emission estimates derived from novel methodologies for termites, herbivores, and fire, which are particularly important in Africa. We further constrained global woody biomass change products with high-quality regional observations. During the RECCAP2 period, Africa's carbon sink capacity is decreasing, with net ecosystem exchange switching from a small sink of −0.61 ± 0.58 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> in RECCAP1 to a small source in RECCAP2 at 0.16 (−0.52/1.36) PgC yr<sup>−1</sup>. Net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions estimated from bottom-up approaches were 1.6 (−0.9/5.8) PgCO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>, net CH<sub>4</sub> were 77 (56.4/93.9) TgCH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup> and net N<sub>2</sub>O were 2.9 (1.4/4.9) TgN<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>. Top-down atmospheric inversions showed similar trends. Land Use Change emissions increased, representing one of the largest contributions at 1.7 (0.8/2.7) PgCO<sub>2</sub>eq yr<sup>−1</sup> to the African GHG budget and almost similar to emissions from fossil fuels at 1.74 (1.53/1.96) PgCO<sub>2</sub>eq yr<sup>−1</sup>, which also increased from RECCAP1. Additionally, wildfire emissions decreased, while fuelwood burning increased. For most component fluxes, uncertainty is large, highlighting the need for increased efforts to address Africa-specific data gaps. However, for RECCAP2, we improved our overall understanding of many of the important components of the African GHG budget that will assist to inform climate policy and action.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GB008016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The African Regional Greenhouse Gases Budget (2010–2019)\",\"authors\":\"Yolandi Ernst,&nbsp;Sally Archibald,&nbsp;Heiko Balzter,&nbsp;Frederic Chevallier,&nbsp;Philippe Ciais,&nbsp;Carlos Gonzalez Fischer,&nbsp;Benjamin Gaubert,&nbsp;Thomas Higginbottom,&nbsp;Steven Higgins,&nbsp;Shakirudeen Lawal,&nbsp;Fabrice Lacroix,&nbsp;Ronny Lauerwald,&nbsp;Mauro Lourenco,&nbsp;Carola Martens,&nbsp;Anteneh G. Mengistu,&nbsp;Lutz Merbold,&nbsp;Edward Mitchard,&nbsp;Mthokozisi Moyo,&nbsp;Hannah Nguyen,&nbsp;Michael O’Sullivan,&nbsp;Pedro Rodríguez-Veiga,&nbsp;Thais Rosan,&nbsp;Judith Rosentreter,&nbsp;Casey Ryan,&nbsp;Simon Scheiter,&nbsp;Stephen Sitch,&nbsp;Nicola Stevens,&nbsp;Torbern Tagesson,&nbsp;Hanqin Tian,&nbsp;Mengjia Wang,&nbsp;Joel S. Woon,&nbsp;Bo Zheng,&nbsp;Yong Zhou,&nbsp;Robert J. Scholes\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023GB008016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As part of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Phase 2 (RECCAP2) project, we developed a comprehensive African Greenhouse gases (GHG) budget covering 2000 to 2019 (RECCAP1 and RECCAP2 time periods), and assessed uncertainties and trends over time. We compared bottom-up process-based models, data-driven remotely sensed products, and national GHG inventories with top-down atmospheric inversions, accounting also for lateral fluxes. We incorporated emission estimates derived from novel methodologies for termites, herbivores, and fire, which are particularly important in Africa. We further constrained global woody biomass change products with high-quality regional observations. During the RECCAP2 period, Africa's carbon sink capacity is decreasing, with net ecosystem exchange switching from a small sink of −0.61 ± 0.58 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> in RECCAP1 to a small source in RECCAP2 at 0.16 (−0.52/1.36) PgC yr<sup>−1</sup>. Net CO<sub>2</sub> emissions estimated from bottom-up approaches were 1.6 (−0.9/5.8) PgCO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup>, net CH<sub>4</sub> were 77 (56.4/93.9) TgCH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>−1</sup> and net N<sub>2</sub>O were 2.9 (1.4/4.9) TgN<sub>2</sub>O yr<sup>−1</sup>. Top-down atmospheric inversions showed similar trends. Land Use Change emissions increased, representing one of the largest contributions at 1.7 (0.8/2.7) PgCO<sub>2</sub>eq yr<sup>−1</sup> to the African GHG budget and almost similar to emissions from fossil fuels at 1.74 (1.53/1.96) PgCO<sub>2</sub>eq yr<sup>−1</sup>, which also increased from RECCAP1. Additionally, wildfire emissions decreased, while fuelwood burning increased. For most component fluxes, uncertainty is large, highlighting the need for increased efforts to address Africa-specific data gaps. However, for RECCAP2, we improved our overall understanding of many of the important components of the African GHG budget that will assist to inform climate policy and action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GB008016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GB008016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GB008016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为区域碳循环评估与过程第二阶段(RECCAP2)项目的一部分,我们编制了涵盖 2000 年至 2019 年(RECCAP1 和 RECCAP2 时间段)的非洲温室气体(GHG)综合预算,并评估了不确定性和随时间变化的趋势。我们将自下而上的基于过程的模型、数据驱动的遥感产品和国家温室气体清单与自上而下的大气反演进行了比较,并考虑了横向通量。我们纳入了白蚁、食草动物和火灾等新方法得出的排放估计值,这在非洲尤为重要。我们利用高质量的区域观测数据进一步约束了全球木质生物量变化产品。在RECCAP2期间,非洲的碳汇能力正在下降,生态系统净交换量从RECCAP1期间的-0.61 ± 0.58 PgC yr-1小汇转变为RECCAP2期间的0.16 (-0.52/1.36) PgC yr-1小源。自下而上方法估计的二氧化碳净排放量为 1.6 (-0.9/5.8) PgCO2 yr-1,甲烷净排放量为 77 (56.4/93.9) TgCH4 yr-1,一氧化二氮净排放量为 2.9 (1.4/4.9) TgN2O yr-1。自上而下的大气反演显示了类似的趋势。土地利用变化排放量增加,是对非洲温室气体预算贡献最大的排放之一,为 1.7 (0.8/2.7) PgCO2eq yr-1,与化石燃料排放量 1.74 (1.53/1.96) PgCO2eq yr-1 几乎相似,后者也比 RECCAP1 有所增加。此外,野火排放减少,而薪材燃烧增加。对于大多数成分通量而言,不确定性很大,这突出表明需要加大力度解决非洲特有的数据缺口问题。不过,对于 RECCAP2,我们提高了对非洲温室气体预算中许多重要组成部分的总体认识,这将有助于为气候政策和行动提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The African Regional Greenhouse Gases Budget (2010–2019)

The African Regional Greenhouse Gases Budget (2010–2019)

As part of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Phase 2 (RECCAP2) project, we developed a comprehensive African Greenhouse gases (GHG) budget covering 2000 to 2019 (RECCAP1 and RECCAP2 time periods), and assessed uncertainties and trends over time. We compared bottom-up process-based models, data-driven remotely sensed products, and national GHG inventories with top-down atmospheric inversions, accounting also for lateral fluxes. We incorporated emission estimates derived from novel methodologies for termites, herbivores, and fire, which are particularly important in Africa. We further constrained global woody biomass change products with high-quality regional observations. During the RECCAP2 period, Africa's carbon sink capacity is decreasing, with net ecosystem exchange switching from a small sink of −0.61 ± 0.58 PgC yr−1 in RECCAP1 to a small source in RECCAP2 at 0.16 (−0.52/1.36) PgC yr−1. Net CO2 emissions estimated from bottom-up approaches were 1.6 (−0.9/5.8) PgCO2 yr−1, net CH4 were 77 (56.4/93.9) TgCH4 yr−1 and net N2O were 2.9 (1.4/4.9) TgN2O yr−1. Top-down atmospheric inversions showed similar trends. Land Use Change emissions increased, representing one of the largest contributions at 1.7 (0.8/2.7) PgCO2eq yr−1 to the African GHG budget and almost similar to emissions from fossil fuels at 1.74 (1.53/1.96) PgCO2eq yr−1, which also increased from RECCAP1. Additionally, wildfire emissions decreased, while fuelwood burning increased. For most component fluxes, uncertainty is large, highlighting the need for increased efforts to address Africa-specific data gaps. However, for RECCAP2, we improved our overall understanding of many of the important components of the African GHG budget that will assist to inform climate policy and action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信