历史上的赤贫与年轻人冠状动脉风险发展中的体重指数和腰围的关系

Andrea S. Richardson MPH, PhD , Tamara Dubowitz ScD , Kirsten M.M. Beyer PhD , Yuhong Zhou PhD , Kiarri N. Kershaw PhD , Waverly Duck PhD , Feifei Ye PhD , Robin Beckman MPH , Penny Gordon-Larsen PhD , James M. Shikany DrPH , Catarina Kiefe MD, PhD
{"title":"历史上的赤贫与年轻人冠状动脉风险发展中的体重指数和腰围的关系","authors":"Andrea S. Richardson MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Tamara Dubowitz ScD ,&nbsp;Kirsten M.M. Beyer PhD ,&nbsp;Yuhong Zhou PhD ,&nbsp;Kiarri N. Kershaw PhD ,&nbsp;Waverly Duck PhD ,&nbsp;Feifei Ye PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Beckman MPH ,&nbsp;Penny Gordon-Larsen PhD ,&nbsp;James M. Shikany DrPH ,&nbsp;Catarina Kiefe MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Historical maps of racialized evaluation of mortgage lending risk (i.e., redlined neighborhoods) have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Little research has examined whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with obesity, differentially by race or gender.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional study to examine whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with BMI and waist circumference among Black and White adults in 1985–1986. Participants’ addresses were linked to the 1930s Home Owners’ Loan Corporation maps that evaluated mortgage lending risk across neighborhoods. The authors used multilevel linear regression models clustered on Census tract, adjusted for confounders to estimate main effects, and stratified, and interaction models by (1) race, (2) gender, and (3) race by gender with redlining differentially for Black versus White adults and men versus women. To better understand strata differences, they compared Census tract–level median household income across race and gender groups within Home Owners’ Loan Corporation grade.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black adults (<em>n</em>=2,103) were more likely than White adults (<em>n</em>=1,767) to live in historically rated hazardous areas and to have higher BMI and waist circumference. Redlining and race and redlining and gender interactions for BMI and waist circumference were statistically significant (<em>p</em>&lt;0.10). However, in stratified analyses, the only statistically significant associations were among White participants. White participants living in historically rated hazardous areas had lower BMI (<span><math><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mn>0.63</mn></mrow></math></span> [95% CI= −1.11, −0.15]) and lower waist circumference (<span><math><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mn>1.50</mn></mrow></math></span> [95% CI= −2.62, −0.38]) than those living in declining areas. Within each Home Owners’ Loan Corporation grade, residents in White participants’ neighborhoods had higher incomes than those living in Black participants’ neighborhoods (<em>p</em>&lt;0.0001). The difference was largest within historically redlined areas. Covariate associations differed for men, women, Black, and White adults, explaining the difference between the interaction and the stratified models. Race by redlining interaction did not vary by gender.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>White adults may have benefitted from historical redlining, which may have reinforced neighborhood processes that generated racial inequality in BMI and waist circumference 50 years later.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000282/pdfft?md5=be95d748e307f831c668eab49da4242b&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000282-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults\",\"authors\":\"Andrea S. Richardson MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Tamara Dubowitz ScD ,&nbsp;Kirsten M.M. Beyer PhD ,&nbsp;Yuhong Zhou PhD ,&nbsp;Kiarri N. Kershaw PhD ,&nbsp;Waverly Duck PhD ,&nbsp;Feifei Ye PhD ,&nbsp;Robin Beckman MPH ,&nbsp;Penny Gordon-Larsen PhD ,&nbsp;James M. Shikany DrPH ,&nbsp;Catarina Kiefe MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Historical maps of racialized evaluation of mortgage lending risk (i.e., redlined neighborhoods) have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Little research has examined whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with obesity, differentially by race or gender.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional study to examine whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with BMI and waist circumference among Black and White adults in 1985–1986. Participants’ addresses were linked to the 1930s Home Owners’ Loan Corporation maps that evaluated mortgage lending risk across neighborhoods. The authors used multilevel linear regression models clustered on Census tract, adjusted for confounders to estimate main effects, and stratified, and interaction models by (1) race, (2) gender, and (3) race by gender with redlining differentially for Black versus White adults and men versus women. To better understand strata differences, they compared Census tract–level median household income across race and gender groups within Home Owners’ Loan Corporation grade.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black adults (<em>n</em>=2,103) were more likely than White adults (<em>n</em>=1,767) to live in historically rated hazardous areas and to have higher BMI and waist circumference. Redlining and race and redlining and gender interactions for BMI and waist circumference were statistically significant (<em>p</em>&lt;0.10). However, in stratified analyses, the only statistically significant associations were among White participants. White participants living in historically rated hazardous areas had lower BMI (<span><math><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mn>0.63</mn></mrow></math></span> [95% CI= −1.11, −0.15]) and lower waist circumference (<span><math><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mn>1.50</mn></mrow></math></span> [95% CI= −2.62, −0.38]) than those living in declining areas. Within each Home Owners’ Loan Corporation grade, residents in White participants’ neighborhoods had higher incomes than those living in Black participants’ neighborhoods (<em>p</em>&lt;0.0001). The difference was largest within historically redlined areas. Covariate associations differed for men, women, Black, and White adults, explaining the difference between the interaction and the stratified models. Race by redlining interaction did not vary by gender.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>White adults may have benefitted from historical redlining, which may have reinforced neighborhood processes that generated racial inequality in BMI and waist circumference 50 years later.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJPM focus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000282/pdfft?md5=be95d748e307f831c668eab49da4242b&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000282-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJPM focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言历史上抵押贷款风险的种族化评估图(即红线社区)与不良健康结果有关。本研究是一项横断面研究,旨在调查 1985-1986 年黑人和白人成年人的体重指数和腰围是否与居住在历史上被划定为红线的社区有关。参与者的地址与 20 世纪 30 年代房屋所有者贷款公司(Home Owners' Loan Corporation)的地图相连,该地图评估了各社区的抵押贷款风险。作者使用多层次线性回归模型对人口普查区进行聚类,并对混杂因素进行调整,以估计主效应,并按(1)种族、(2)性别和(3)种族与性别进行分层和交互模型,对黑人和白人成年人以及男性和女性进行红线区分。为了更好地理解分层差异,他们比较了房屋所有者贷款公司分级中不同种族和性别群体的人口普查区家庭收入中位数。结果黑人成年人(人数=2103)比白人成年人(人数=1767)更有可能居住在历史上被评为危险的地区,其体重指数和腰围也更高。在体重指数和腰围方面,红线与种族以及红线与性别之间的交互作用具有统计学意义(p<0.10)。然而,在分层分析中,唯一具有统计学意义的关联是在白人参与者中。居住在历史危险地区的白人参与者的体重指数(β=-0.63 [95% CI= -1.11, -0.15])和腰围(β=-1.50 [95% CI= -2.62, -0.38])均低于居住在衰退地区的白人参与者。在房屋所有者贷款公司的各个等级中,白人参与者所在社区的居民收入高于黑人参与者所在社区的居民(p<0.0001)。在历史上被划为红线的地区,这种差异最大。男性、女性、黑人和白人成年人的协变量关联各不相同,这解释了交互模型和分层模型之间的差异。结论白人成年人可能受益于历史上的重划区,这可能强化了50年后产生BMI和腰围种族不平等的邻里过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults

Introduction

Historical maps of racialized evaluation of mortgage lending risk (i.e., redlined neighborhoods) have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Little research has examined whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with obesity, differentially by race or gender.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study to examine whether living in historically redlined neighborhoods is associated with BMI and waist circumference among Black and White adults in 1985–1986. Participants’ addresses were linked to the 1930s Home Owners’ Loan Corporation maps that evaluated mortgage lending risk across neighborhoods. The authors used multilevel linear regression models clustered on Census tract, adjusted for confounders to estimate main effects, and stratified, and interaction models by (1) race, (2) gender, and (3) race by gender with redlining differentially for Black versus White adults and men versus women. To better understand strata differences, they compared Census tract–level median household income across race and gender groups within Home Owners’ Loan Corporation grade.

Results

Black adults (n=2,103) were more likely than White adults (n=1,767) to live in historically rated hazardous areas and to have higher BMI and waist circumference. Redlining and race and redlining and gender interactions for BMI and waist circumference were statistically significant (p<0.10). However, in stratified analyses, the only statistically significant associations were among White participants. White participants living in historically rated hazardous areas had lower BMI (β=0.63 [95% CI= −1.11, −0.15]) and lower waist circumference (β=1.50 [95% CI= −2.62, −0.38]) than those living in declining areas. Within each Home Owners’ Loan Corporation grade, residents in White participants’ neighborhoods had higher incomes than those living in Black participants’ neighborhoods (p<0.0001). The difference was largest within historically redlined areas. Covariate associations differed for men, women, Black, and White adults, explaining the difference between the interaction and the stratified models. Race by redlining interaction did not vary by gender.

Conclusions

White adults may have benefitted from historical redlining, which may have reinforced neighborhood processes that generated racial inequality in BMI and waist circumference 50 years later.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信