台湾抗线粒体抗体阳性与原发性胆汁性胆管炎的演变关系:一项为期 16 年的医院队列研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241241227
Ming-Ling Chang, Jur-Shan Cheng, Puo-Hsien Le, Wei-Ting Chen, Hsin-Ping Ku, Rong-Nan Chien
{"title":"台湾抗线粒体抗体阳性与原发性胆汁性胆管炎的演变关系:一项为期 16 年的医院队列研究。","authors":"Ming-Ling Chang, Jur-Shan Cheng, Puo-Hsien Le, Wei-Ting Chen, Hsin-Ping Ku, Rong-Nan Chien","doi":"10.1177/17562848241241227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How antimitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive patients evolve to have primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in viral hepatitis-endemic areas is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate this evolution in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>A 16-year medical center-based cohort study of 2,095,628 subjects was conducted in Taiwan, an Asian country endemic to viral hepatitis. AMA-positive subjects were those with positive AMA with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ⩽1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), and PBC was defined as positive AMA with ALP >1.5 × ULN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AMA-positive subjects had a lower average age- and sex-adjusted prevalence than PBC patients (4.68/10<sup>5</sup> <i>versus</i> 11.61/10<sup>5</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), but their incidence was comparable (0.99/10<sup>5</sup> <i>versus</i> 1.12/10<sup>5</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.36). The former group had a borderline significantly lower mean age (56.59 years <i>versus</i> 58.10 years, <i>p</i> = 0.06) and a lower female-to-male ratio (2.85:1 <i>versus</i> 5.44:1, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Both AMA-positive subjects (prevalence change: 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; incidence change: -9.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and PBC patients (prevalence change: 14.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; incidence change: -4.7%, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.01) prevalence rate increased but the incidence rate decreased. Among the 423 AMA-positive subjects, 77 (18.2%) developed PBC, for a mean duration of 1.757 years. Compared with AMA-positive subjects, PBC patients had similar concurrent chronic hepatitis B (CHB) rates (2.7% <i>versus</i> 4.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.197) but lower chronic hepatitis C (CHC) rates (3.69% <i>versus</i> 15.60%, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBC was more prevalent than AMA-positive subjects, and PBC patients had a higher female-to-male ratio than AMA-positive subjects, of whom 18.2% developed PBC (mean lag: 1.757 years). Upward trends in prevalence rates and downward trends in incidence rates were noted for both AMA-positive subjects and PBC. CHB was rare, CHC was more prevalent among PBC patients than the general population, and CHC was less prevalent among PBC than among AMA-positive subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolutionary relationship between antimitochondrial antibody positivity and primary biliary cholangitis in Taiwan: a 16-year hospital cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Ling Chang, Jur-Shan Cheng, Puo-Hsien Le, Wei-Ting Chen, Hsin-Ping Ku, Rong-Nan Chien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848241241227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How antimitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive patients evolve to have primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in viral hepatitis-endemic areas is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate this evolution in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>A 16-year medical center-based cohort study of 2,095,628 subjects was conducted in Taiwan, an Asian country endemic to viral hepatitis. AMA-positive subjects were those with positive AMA with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ⩽1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), and PBC was defined as positive AMA with ALP >1.5 × ULN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AMA-positive subjects had a lower average age- and sex-adjusted prevalence than PBC patients (4.68/10<sup>5</sup> <i>versus</i> 11.61/10<sup>5</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), but their incidence was comparable (0.99/10<sup>5</sup> <i>versus</i> 1.12/10<sup>5</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.36). The former group had a borderline significantly lower mean age (56.59 years <i>versus</i> 58.10 years, <i>p</i> = 0.06) and a lower female-to-male ratio (2.85:1 <i>versus</i> 5.44:1, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Both AMA-positive subjects (prevalence change: 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; incidence change: -9.2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and PBC patients (prevalence change: 14.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; incidence change: -4.7%, <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.01) prevalence rate increased but the incidence rate decreased. Among the 423 AMA-positive subjects, 77 (18.2%) developed PBC, for a mean duration of 1.757 years. Compared with AMA-positive subjects, PBC patients had similar concurrent chronic hepatitis B (CHB) rates (2.7% <i>versus</i> 4.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.197) but lower chronic hepatitis C (CHC) rates (3.69% <i>versus</i> 15.60%, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBC was more prevalent than AMA-positive subjects, and PBC patients had a higher female-to-male ratio than AMA-positive subjects, of whom 18.2% developed PBC (mean lag: 1.757 years). Upward trends in prevalence rates and downward trends in incidence rates were noted for both AMA-positive subjects and PBC. CHB was rare, CHC was more prevalent among PBC patients than the general population, and CHC was less prevalent among PBC than among AMA-positive subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241241227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241241227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在病毒性肝炎流行地区,抗线粒体抗体(AMA)阳性患者是如何演变为原发性胆汁性胆管炎的?在病毒性肝炎流行地区,抗线粒体抗体(AMA)阳性患者如何演变为原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)尚不清楚:设计/方法:一项为期 16 年、以医疗中心为基础的队列研究:我们在病毒性肝炎流行的亚洲国家台湾开展了一项为期 16 年、以医疗中心为基础的队列研究,共纳入 2,095,628 名受试者。AMA阳性受试者是指AMA阳性且碱性磷酸酶(ALP)⩽1.5倍于正常值上限(ULN)的受试者,PBC是指AMA阳性且ALP >1.5 × ULN的受试者:经年龄和性别调整后,AMA 阳性受试者的平均患病率低于 PBC 患者(4.68/105 对 11.61/105,p = 0.0002),但两者的发病率相当(0.99/105 对 1.12/105,p = 0.36)。前者的平均年龄略低(56.59 岁对 58.10 岁,p = 0.06),男女比例较低(2.85:1 对 5.44:1,p p p p 0.01),患病率有所上升,但发病率有所下降。在 423 名 AMA 阳性受试者中,有 77 人(18.2%)发展为 PBC,平均病程为 1.757 年。与 AMA 阳性受试者相比,PBC 患者的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)并发率相似(2.7% 对 4.3%,P = 0.197),但慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)并发率较低(3.69% 对 15.60%,P 结论:PBC 的发病率高于 AMA 阳性受试者:PBC的发病率高于AMA阳性受试者,PBC患者的男女比例高于AMA阳性受试者,其中18.2%的患者发展为PBC(平均滞后时间:1.757年)。AMA阳性受试者和PBC的患病率呈上升趋势,发病率呈下降趋势。CHB很少见,CHC在PBC患者中的发病率高于普通人群,而CHC在PBC患者中的发病率低于AMA阳性受试者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolutionary relationship between antimitochondrial antibody positivity and primary biliary cholangitis in Taiwan: a 16-year hospital cohort study.

Background: How antimitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive patients evolve to have primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in viral hepatitis-endemic areas is unknown.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate this evolution in Taiwan.

Design/methods: A 16-year medical center-based cohort study of 2,095,628 subjects was conducted in Taiwan, an Asian country endemic to viral hepatitis. AMA-positive subjects were those with positive AMA with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ⩽1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), and PBC was defined as positive AMA with ALP >1.5 × ULN.

Results: AMA-positive subjects had a lower average age- and sex-adjusted prevalence than PBC patients (4.68/105 versus 11.61/105, p = 0.0002), but their incidence was comparable (0.99/105 versus 1.12/105, p = 0.36). The former group had a borderline significantly lower mean age (56.59 years versus 58.10 years, p = 0.06) and a lower female-to-male ratio (2.85:1 versus 5.44:1, p < 0.0001). Both AMA-positive subjects (prevalence change: 20.0%, p < 0.01; incidence change: -9.2%, p < 0.01) and PBC patients (prevalence change: 14.6%, p < 0.01; incidence change: -4.7%, p< 0.01) prevalence rate increased but the incidence rate decreased. Among the 423 AMA-positive subjects, 77 (18.2%) developed PBC, for a mean duration of 1.757 years. Compared with AMA-positive subjects, PBC patients had similar concurrent chronic hepatitis B (CHB) rates (2.7% versus 4.3%, p = 0.197) but lower chronic hepatitis C (CHC) rates (3.69% versus 15.60%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: PBC was more prevalent than AMA-positive subjects, and PBC patients had a higher female-to-male ratio than AMA-positive subjects, of whom 18.2% developed PBC (mean lag: 1.757 years). Upward trends in prevalence rates and downward trends in incidence rates were noted for both AMA-positive subjects and PBC. CHB was rare, CHC was more prevalent among PBC patients than the general population, and CHC was less prevalent among PBC than among AMA-positive subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信