颈椎转移性脊柱癌术前放疗会增加颈椎前路手术围手术期并发症吗?

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.4055/cios23322
Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Woo Park, Jin Hoon Park, Sehan Park
{"title":"颈椎转移性脊柱癌术前放疗会增加颈椎前路手术围手术期并发症吗?","authors":"Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Woo Park, Jin Hoon Park, Sehan Park","doi":"10.4055/cios23322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation therapy (RT) performed before anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) may cause fascial plane fibrosis, decreased soft-tissue vascularity, and vertebral body weakness, which could increase the risk of esophageal and major vessel injuries, wound complications, and construct subsidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative RT performed for metastatic spine cancer (MSC) at the cervical spine increases perioperative morbidity for ACSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients who underwent ACSS for treatment of MSC at the cervical spine were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomy via the anterior approach. Patient demographics, surgical factors, operative factors, and complications were recorded. Results of patients who were initially treated with RT before ACSS (RT group) were compared with those who did not receive RT before ACSS (non-RT group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (36.7%) were included in the RT group, while the remaining 31 (63.3%) were included in the non-RT group. Surgery-related factors, including operation time (<i>p</i> = 0.109), estimated blood loss (<i>p</i> = 0.246), amount of postoperative drainage (<i>p</i> = 0.604), number of levels operated (<i>p</i> = 0.207), and number of patients who underwent combined posterior fusion (<i>p</i> = 0.768), did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Complication rates, including esophageal injury, dural tear, infection, wound dehiscence, and mechanical failure, did not significantly differ between the RT and non-RT groups. Early subsidence was significantly greater in the non-RT group compared to that in the RT group (<i>p</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RT performed before surgery for MSC does not increase the risk of wound complication, mechanical failure, or vital structure injury during ACSS. The surgical procedural approach was not complicated by previous RT history. Therefore, surgeons can safely choose the anterior approach when the number of levels or location of MSC favors anterior surgery, and performing a posterior surgery is unnecessary due to a concern that previous RT may increase complication rates of ACSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"16 2","pages":"286-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Preoperative Radiation Therapy Performed for Metastatic Spine Cancer at the Cervical Spine Increase Perioperative Complications of Anterior Cervical Surgery?\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Woo Park, Jin Hoon Park, Sehan Park\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios23322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation therapy (RT) performed before anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) may cause fascial plane fibrosis, decreased soft-tissue vascularity, and vertebral body weakness, which could increase the risk of esophageal and major vessel injuries, wound complications, and construct subsidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative RT performed for metastatic spine cancer (MSC) at the cervical spine increases perioperative morbidity for ACSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients who underwent ACSS for treatment of MSC at the cervical spine were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomy via the anterior approach. Patient demographics, surgical factors, operative factors, and complications were recorded. Results of patients who were initially treated with RT before ACSS (RT group) were compared with those who did not receive RT before ACSS (non-RT group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients (36.7%) were included in the RT group, while the remaining 31 (63.3%) were included in the non-RT group. Surgery-related factors, including operation time (<i>p</i> = 0.109), estimated blood loss (<i>p</i> = 0.246), amount of postoperative drainage (<i>p</i> = 0.604), number of levels operated (<i>p</i> = 0.207), and number of patients who underwent combined posterior fusion (<i>p</i> = 0.768), did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Complication rates, including esophageal injury, dural tear, infection, wound dehiscence, and mechanical failure, did not significantly differ between the RT and non-RT groups. Early subsidence was significantly greater in the non-RT group compared to that in the RT group (<i>p</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RT performed before surgery for MSC does not increase the risk of wound complication, mechanical failure, or vital structure injury during ACSS. The surgical procedural approach was not complicated by previous RT history. Therefore, surgeons can safely choose the anterior approach when the number of levels or location of MSC favors anterior surgery, and performing a posterior surgery is unnecessary due to a concern that previous RT may increase complication rates of ACSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"286-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈椎前路手术(ACSS)前进行的放射治疗(RT)可能会导致筋膜面纤维化、软组织血管减少和椎体无力,从而增加食管和大血管损伤、伤口并发症和结构下沉的风险。因此,本研究旨在评估颈椎转移性脊柱癌(MSC)术前 RT 是否会增加 ACSS 的围手术期发病率:方法:回顾性研究了49例接受ACSS治疗的颈椎MSC患者。所有患者均通过前路接受了颈椎前路椎体切除术。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、手术因素、操作因素和并发症。将在 ACSS 前接受 RT 治疗的患者(RT 组)与 ACSS 前未接受 RT 治疗的患者(非 RT 组)的结果进行比较:结果:18 名患者(36.7%)被纳入 RT 组,其余 31 名患者(63.3%)被纳入非 RT 组。手术相关因素,包括手术时间(p = 0.109)、估计失血量(p = 0.246)、术后引流量(p = 0.604)、手术水平数(p = 0.207)和接受联合后路融合术的患者人数(p = 0.768),在两组之间没有显著差异。并发症发生率,包括食管损伤、硬膜撕裂、感染、伤口开裂和机械故障,在 RT 组和非 RT 组之间没有明显差异。与 RT 组相比,非 RT 组的早期下沉率明显更高(p = 0.012):结论:在间充质干细胞手术前进行 RT 不会增加 ACSS 期间伤口并发症、机械故障或重要结构损伤的风险。手术方法不会因为之前的 RT 史而变得复杂。因此,如果间充质干细胞的层数或位置有利于前路手术,外科医生就可以放心地选择前路手术,而不必因为担心之前的 RT 会增加 ACSS 的并发症发生率而进行后路手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Preoperative Radiation Therapy Performed for Metastatic Spine Cancer at the Cervical Spine Increase Perioperative Complications of Anterior Cervical Surgery?

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) performed before anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) may cause fascial plane fibrosis, decreased soft-tissue vascularity, and vertebral body weakness, which could increase the risk of esophageal and major vessel injuries, wound complications, and construct subsidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative RT performed for metastatic spine cancer (MSC) at the cervical spine increases perioperative morbidity for ACSS.

Methods: Forty-nine patients who underwent ACSS for treatment of MSC at the cervical spine were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomy via the anterior approach. Patient demographics, surgical factors, operative factors, and complications were recorded. Results of patients who were initially treated with RT before ACSS (RT group) were compared with those who did not receive RT before ACSS (non-RT group).

Results: Eighteen patients (36.7%) were included in the RT group, while the remaining 31 (63.3%) were included in the non-RT group. Surgery-related factors, including operation time (p = 0.109), estimated blood loss (p = 0.246), amount of postoperative drainage (p = 0.604), number of levels operated (p = 0.207), and number of patients who underwent combined posterior fusion (p = 0.768), did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Complication rates, including esophageal injury, dural tear, infection, wound dehiscence, and mechanical failure, did not significantly differ between the RT and non-RT groups. Early subsidence was significantly greater in the non-RT group compared to that in the RT group (p = 0.012).

Conclusions: RT performed before surgery for MSC does not increase the risk of wound complication, mechanical failure, or vital structure injury during ACSS. The surgical procedural approach was not complicated by previous RT history. Therefore, surgeons can safely choose the anterior approach when the number of levels or location of MSC favors anterior surgery, and performing a posterior surgery is unnecessary due to a concern that previous RT may increase complication rates of ACSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信