眶上开颅术中眼睑法与眉部法的临床效果和并发症:系统回顾和间接荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gnel Pivazyan, Carlos Aguilera, Jiaqi Liu, Ziam Khan, Georgia M Wong, Ehsan Dowlati, Kelsi Chesney, Jeffrey C Mai, Amjad Anaizi, Samir Sur
{"title":"眶上开颅术中眼睑法与眉部法的临床效果和并发症:系统回顾和间接荟萃分析。","authors":"Gnel Pivazyan, Carlos Aguilera, Jiaqi Liu, Ziam Khan, Georgia M Wong, Ehsan Dowlati, Kelsi Chesney, Jeffrey C Mai, Amjad Anaizi, Samir Sur","doi":"10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy is a versatile keyhole technique for treating intracranial pathologies. The eyelid supraorbital approach, an alternative approach to an eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy, has not been widely adopted among most neurosurgeons. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform a pooled analysis of the complications of eyebrow or eyelid approaches for the treatment of aneurysms, meningiomas, and orbital tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for identifying relevant literature using keywords such as \"supraorbital,\" \"eyelid,\" \"eyebrow,\" \"tumor,\" and \"aneurysm.\" Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomies with or without orbitotomies and eyelid supraorbital craniotomies with orbitotomies for the treatment of orbital tumors, intracranial meningiomas, and aneurysms were selected. The primary outcomes were overall complications, cosmetic complications, and residual aneurysms and tumors. Secondary outcomes included five complication domains: orbital, wound-related, scalp or facial, neurological, and other complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred three articles were included in the synthesis. The pooled numbers of patients in the eyebrow and eyelid groups were 4689 and 358, respectively. No differences were found in overall complications or cosmetic complications between the eyebrow and eyelid groups. The proportion of residuals in the eyelid group (11.21%, effect size [ES] 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in the eyebrow group (6.17%, ES 0.10, 95% CI 0.08-0.13). A subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher incidences of orbital, wound-related, and scalp or facial complications in the eyelid group (p < 0.05), but higher other complications in the eyebrow group. Performing an orbitotomy substantially increased the complication risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first meta-analysis that quantitatively compared complications of eyebrow versus eyelid approaches to supraorbital craniotomy. This study found similar overall complication rates but higher rates of selected complication domains in the eyelid group. The literature is limited by a high degree of variability in the reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes and complications of eyelid versus eyebrow approaches to supraorbital craniotomy: systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gnel Pivazyan, Carlos Aguilera, Jiaqi Liu, Ziam Khan, Georgia M Wong, Ehsan Dowlati, Kelsi Chesney, Jeffrey C Mai, Amjad Anaizi, Samir Sur\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy is a versatile keyhole technique for treating intracranial pathologies. The eyelid supraorbital approach, an alternative approach to an eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy, has not been widely adopted among most neurosurgeons. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform a pooled analysis of the complications of eyebrow or eyelid approaches for the treatment of aneurysms, meningiomas, and orbital tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for identifying relevant literature using keywords such as \\\"supraorbital,\\\" \\\"eyelid,\\\" \\\"eyebrow,\\\" \\\"tumor,\\\" and \\\"aneurysm.\\\" Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomies with or without orbitotomies and eyelid supraorbital craniotomies with orbitotomies for the treatment of orbital tumors, intracranial meningiomas, and aneurysms were selected. The primary outcomes were overall complications, cosmetic complications, and residual aneurysms and tumors. Secondary outcomes included five complication domains: orbital, wound-related, scalp or facial, neurological, and other complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred three articles were included in the synthesis. The pooled numbers of patients in the eyebrow and eyelid groups were 4689 and 358, respectively. No differences were found in overall complications or cosmetic complications between the eyebrow and eyelid groups. The proportion of residuals in the eyelid group (11.21%, effect size [ES] 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in the eyebrow group (6.17%, ES 0.10, 95% CI 0.08-0.13). A subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher incidences of orbital, wound-related, and scalp or facial complications in the eyelid group (p < 0.05), but higher other complications in the eyebrow group. Performing an orbitotomy substantially increased the complication risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first meta-analysis that quantitatively compared complications of eyebrow versus eyelid approaches to supraorbital craniotomy. This study found similar overall complication rates but higher rates of selected complication domains in the eyelid group. The literature is limited by a high degree of variability in the reported outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23878\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.1.FOCUS23878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:眉上眶上开颅术是一种治疗颅内病变的多功能锁孔技术。眼睑眶上法是眉上开颅术的替代方法,但尚未被大多数神经外科医生广泛采用。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是对眉部或眼睑入路治疗动脉瘤、脑膜瘤和眼眶肿瘤的并发症进行汇总分析:方法:使用 "眶上"、"眼睑"、"眉毛"、"肿瘤 "和 "动脉瘤 "等关键词对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Review数据库中的文献进行了系统回顾,以确定相关文献。选取了治疗眼眶肿瘤、颅内脑膜瘤和动脉瘤的眼眉眶上开颅手术(带或不带开眶手术)和眼睑眶上开颅手术(带开眶手术)。主要结果包括总体并发症、外观并发症以及残留动脉瘤和肿瘤。次要结果包括五个并发症领域:眼眶并发症、伤口相关并发症、头皮或面部并发症、神经系统并发症和其他并发症:结果:有 103 篇文章被纳入综述。汇总的眉毛组和眼睑组患者人数分别为 4689 人和 358 人。眉毛组和眼睑组在总体并发症和美容并发症方面没有发现差异。眼睑组的残留比例(11.21%,效应大小[ES] 0.26,95% CI 0.12-0.41)明显高于眉毛组(6.17%,ES 0.10,95% CI 0.08-0.13)(P < 0.05)。亚组分析显示,眼睑组眼眶、伤口相关、头皮或面部并发症的发生率明显高于眉毛组(P < 0.05),但其他并发症的发生率高于眉毛组。进行眼眶切开术大大增加了并发症风险:这是第一项定量比较眉部与眼睑开颅术并发症的荟萃分析。该研究发现,眼睑组的总体并发症发生率相似,但某些特定并发症领域的发生率更高。由于所报告的结果差异很大,因此文献研究受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes and complications of eyelid versus eyebrow approaches to supraorbital craniotomy: systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Objective: Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy is a versatile keyhole technique for treating intracranial pathologies. The eyelid supraorbital approach, an alternative approach to an eyebrow supraorbital craniotomy, has not been widely adopted among most neurosurgeons. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to perform a pooled analysis of the complications of eyebrow or eyelid approaches for the treatment of aneurysms, meningiomas, and orbital tumors.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for identifying relevant literature using keywords such as "supraorbital," "eyelid," "eyebrow," "tumor," and "aneurysm." Eyebrow supraorbital craniotomies with or without orbitotomies and eyelid supraorbital craniotomies with orbitotomies for the treatment of orbital tumors, intracranial meningiomas, and aneurysms were selected. The primary outcomes were overall complications, cosmetic complications, and residual aneurysms and tumors. Secondary outcomes included five complication domains: orbital, wound-related, scalp or facial, neurological, and other complications.

Results: One hundred three articles were included in the synthesis. The pooled numbers of patients in the eyebrow and eyelid groups were 4689 and 358, respectively. No differences were found in overall complications or cosmetic complications between the eyebrow and eyelid groups. The proportion of residuals in the eyelid group (11.21%, effect size [ES] 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in the eyebrow group (6.17%, ES 0.10, 95% CI 0.08-0.13). A subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher incidences of orbital, wound-related, and scalp or facial complications in the eyelid group (p < 0.05), but higher other complications in the eyebrow group. Performing an orbitotomy substantially increased the complication risk.

Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis that quantitatively compared complications of eyebrow versus eyelid approaches to supraorbital craniotomy. This study found similar overall complication rates but higher rates of selected complication domains in the eyelid group. The literature is limited by a high degree of variability in the reported outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信