美罗培南导致丙戊酸血浆浓度下降对丙戊酸抗癫痫药效的影响

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Chunping Gu, Yongfang Zhang, Fumiao Yuan, Kaibin Huang, Zhenzhou Lin, Qiong Chen, Yan Chen, Yongming Wu, Dongmei Wang, Shengnan Wang
{"title":"美罗培南导致丙戊酸血浆浓度下降对丙戊酸抗癫痫药效的影响","authors":"Chunping Gu,&nbsp;Yongfang Zhang,&nbsp;Fumiao Yuan,&nbsp;Kaibin Huang,&nbsp;Zhenzhou Lin,&nbsp;Qiong Chen,&nbsp;Yan Chen,&nbsp;Yongming Wu,&nbsp;Dongmei Wang,&nbsp;Shengnan Wang","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to indicate whether a declined plasma concentration of valproic acid (VPA) induced by co-administration of meropenem (MEPM) could affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed data of hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with status epilepticus or epilepsy between 2010 and 2019. Patients co-administered VPA and MEPM during hospitalization were screened and assigned to the exposure group, while those co-administerd VPA and other broad-spectrum antibiotics were allocated to the control group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The exposure group and control group included 50 and 11 patients, respectively. With a similar dosage of VPA, the plasma concentration of VPA significantly decreased during co-administration (24.6 ± 4.3 μg/mL) compared with that before co-administration (88.8 ± 13.6 μg/mL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and it was partly recovered with the termination of co-administration (39.8 ± 13.2 μg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.163) in the exposure group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the treatment efficacy via changes in seizure frequency, seizure duration, and concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs, which were not significantly different between the exposure and control groups. In the exposure group, there was no significant differences in seizure frequency between the periods of before-during and before-after (<i>p</i> = 0.074 and 0.153, respectively). Seizure duration during VPA–MEPM co-administration was not significantly different from that before co-administration (<i>p</i> = 0.291).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, the reduced plasma concentration of VPA induced by the co-administration of MEPM did not affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA. This conclusion should be interpreted with caution, and more research is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000034567. Registered on 10 July 2020</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.25025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a Declined Plasma Concentration of Valproic Acid Induced by Meropenem on the Antiepileptic Efficacy of Valproic Acid\",\"authors\":\"Chunping Gu,&nbsp;Yongfang Zhang,&nbsp;Fumiao Yuan,&nbsp;Kaibin Huang,&nbsp;Zhenzhou Lin,&nbsp;Qiong Chen,&nbsp;Yan Chen,&nbsp;Yongming Wu,&nbsp;Dongmei Wang,&nbsp;Shengnan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcla.25025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to indicate whether a declined plasma concentration of valproic acid (VPA) induced by co-administration of meropenem (MEPM) could affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively reviewed data of hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with status epilepticus or epilepsy between 2010 and 2019. Patients co-administered VPA and MEPM during hospitalization were screened and assigned to the exposure group, while those co-administerd VPA and other broad-spectrum antibiotics were allocated to the control group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The exposure group and control group included 50 and 11 patients, respectively. With a similar dosage of VPA, the plasma concentration of VPA significantly decreased during co-administration (24.6 ± 4.3 μg/mL) compared with that before co-administration (88.8 ± 13.6 μg/mL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and it was partly recovered with the termination of co-administration (39.8 ± 13.2 μg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.163) in the exposure group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the treatment efficacy via changes in seizure frequency, seizure duration, and concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs, which were not significantly different between the exposure and control groups. In the exposure group, there was no significant differences in seizure frequency between the periods of before-during and before-after (<i>p</i> = 0.074 and 0.153, respectively). Seizure duration during VPA–MEPM co-administration was not significantly different from that before co-administration (<i>p</i> = 0.291).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, the reduced plasma concentration of VPA induced by the co-administration of MEPM did not affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA. This conclusion should be interpreted with caution, and more research is warranted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000034567. Registered on 10 July 2020</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.25025\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在说明联合应用美罗培南(MEPM)引起的丙戊酸(VPA)血浆浓度下降是否会影响VPA的抗癫痫疗效:我们回顾性研究了2010年至2019年期间被诊断为癫痫状态或癫痫的住院患者的数据。筛选住院期间联合使用 VPA 和 MEPM 的患者并将其分配到暴露组,而联合使用 VPA 和其他广谱抗生素的患者则分配到对照组:暴露组和对照组分别包括 50 名和 11 名患者。结果:暴露组和对照组分别有 50 名和 11 名患者,在使用类似剂量的 VPA 时,VPA 的血浆浓度(24.6 ± 4.3 μg/mL)与联合用药前(88.8 ± 13.6 μg/mL,P)相比明显下降:在本研究中,合用 MEPM 导致的 VPA 血浆浓度降低并未影响 VPA 的抗癫痫疗效。对这一结论的解释应谨慎,还需要更多的研究:试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2000034567。注册日期:2020年7月10日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of a Declined Plasma Concentration of Valproic Acid Induced by Meropenem on the Antiepileptic Efficacy of Valproic Acid

Effect of a Declined Plasma Concentration of Valproic Acid Induced by Meropenem on the Antiepileptic Efficacy of Valproic Acid

Effect of a Declined Plasma Concentration of Valproic Acid Induced by Meropenem on the Antiepileptic Efficacy of Valproic Acid

Objective

This study aimed to indicate whether a declined plasma concentration of valproic acid (VPA) induced by co-administration of meropenem (MEPM) could affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with status epilepticus or epilepsy between 2010 and 2019. Patients co-administered VPA and MEPM during hospitalization were screened and assigned to the exposure group, while those co-administerd VPA and other broad-spectrum antibiotics were allocated to the control group.

Results

The exposure group and control group included 50 and 11 patients, respectively. With a similar dosage of VPA, the plasma concentration of VPA significantly decreased during co-administration (24.6 ± 4.3 μg/mL) compared with that before co-administration (88.8 ± 13.6 μg/mL, p < 0.0001), and it was partly recovered with the termination of co-administration (39.8 ± 13.2 μg/mL, p = 0.163) in the exposure group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting estimated the treatment efficacy via changes in seizure frequency, seizure duration, and concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs, which were not significantly different between the exposure and control groups. In the exposure group, there was no significant differences in seizure frequency between the periods of before-during and before-after (p = 0.074 and 0.153, respectively). Seizure duration during VPA–MEPM co-administration was not significantly different from that before co-administration (p = 0.291).

Conclusions

In this study, the reduced plasma concentration of VPA induced by the co-administration of MEPM did not affect the antiepileptic efficacy of VPA. This conclusion should be interpreted with caution, and more research is warranted.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000034567. Registered on 10 July 2020

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信