日语版晨昏程度问卷。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Taisuke Eto, Yuki Nishimura, Hiroki Ikeda, Tomohide Kubo, Ana Adan, Shingo Kitamura
{"title":"日语版晨昏程度问卷。","authors":"Taisuke Eto, Yuki Nishimura, Hiroki Ikeda, Tomohide Kubo, Ana Adan, Shingo Kitamura","doi":"10.1080/07420528.2024.2334048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circadian typology, or \"morningness\" and \"eveningness,\" is generally assessed using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), a 19-item scale that could be burdensome in large-scale surveys. To overcome this, a 5-item version known as the reduced morningness-eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ), which is sensitive to the assessment of circadian typology, was developed; however, a validated Japanese version of the rMEQ is yet to be established. This study aimed to develop and validate the Japanese version of the rMEQ. Five essential items for the rMEQ were selected from existing Japanese MEQ data (<i>N</i> = 2,213), and the rMEQ was compiled. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis for the psychometric properties of the rMEQ and confirmed its robust one-factor structure for evaluating morningness-eveningness (GFI = 0.984, AGFI = 0.951, CFI = 0.935, and RMSEA = 0.091). Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency of rMEQ items using Cronbach's <i>α</i> and McDonald's <i>ω</i>, and the values were 0.618 and 0.654, respectively. The rMEQ scores strongly correlated with MEQ (<i>ρ</i> = 0.883, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and classification agreement (Morning, Neither, and Evening types) between rMEQ and MEQ was 77.6% (Cramer's <i>V</i> = 0.643, Weighted Cohen's <i>κ</i> = 0.72), confirming the validity. The Japanese rMEQ may be a valuable tool for the efficient assessment of circadian typologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10294,"journal":{"name":"Chronobiology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Japanese version of the reduced morningness-eveningness questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Taisuke Eto, Yuki Nishimura, Hiroki Ikeda, Tomohide Kubo, Ana Adan, Shingo Kitamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07420528.2024.2334048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Circadian typology, or \\\"morningness\\\" and \\\"eveningness,\\\" is generally assessed using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), a 19-item scale that could be burdensome in large-scale surveys. To overcome this, a 5-item version known as the reduced morningness-eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ), which is sensitive to the assessment of circadian typology, was developed; however, a validated Japanese version of the rMEQ is yet to be established. This study aimed to develop and validate the Japanese version of the rMEQ. Five essential items for the rMEQ were selected from existing Japanese MEQ data (<i>N</i> = 2,213), and the rMEQ was compiled. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis for the psychometric properties of the rMEQ and confirmed its robust one-factor structure for evaluating morningness-eveningness (GFI = 0.984, AGFI = 0.951, CFI = 0.935, and RMSEA = 0.091). Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency of rMEQ items using Cronbach's <i>α</i> and McDonald's <i>ω</i>, and the values were 0.618 and 0.654, respectively. The rMEQ scores strongly correlated with MEQ (<i>ρ</i> = 0.883, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and classification agreement (Morning, Neither, and Evening types) between rMEQ and MEQ was 77.6% (Cramer's <i>V</i> = 0.643, Weighted Cohen's <i>κ</i> = 0.72), confirming the validity. The Japanese rMEQ may be a valuable tool for the efficient assessment of circadian typologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronobiology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronobiology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2024.2334048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronobiology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2024.2334048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

昼夜节律类型学,即 "早睡 "和 "晚睡",通常使用 "早睡晚睡问卷"(MEQ)进行评估,该问卷包含 19 个项目,在大规模调查中可能会造成负担。为了克服这一问题,我们开发了一个对昼夜节律类型学评估敏感的 5 个项目的版本,即简化版晨昏问卷(rMEQ)。本研究旨在开发和验证日语版的 rMEQ。我们从现有的日本 "昼夜节律调查表 "数据(N = 2,213)中选取了五个基本项目,并编制了日文版 "昼夜节律调查表"。我们对 rMEQ 的心理测量学特性进行了确认性因子分析,证实了它在评价早间偶合度方面稳健的单因子结构(GFI = 0.984,AGFI = 0.951,CFI = 0.935,RMSEA = 0.091)。rMEQ项目的内部一致性采用Cronbach's α和McDonald's ω进行评估,其信度值分别为0.618和0.654。rMEQ得分与MEQ密切相关(ρ = 0.883,p V = 0.643,加权科恩κ = 0.72),证实了rMEQ的有效性。日本的 rMEQ 可能是有效评估昼夜节律类型的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Japanese version of the reduced morningness-eveningness questionnaire.

Circadian typology, or "morningness" and "eveningness," is generally assessed using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), a 19-item scale that could be burdensome in large-scale surveys. To overcome this, a 5-item version known as the reduced morningness-eveningness questionnaire (rMEQ), which is sensitive to the assessment of circadian typology, was developed; however, a validated Japanese version of the rMEQ is yet to be established. This study aimed to develop and validate the Japanese version of the rMEQ. Five essential items for the rMEQ were selected from existing Japanese MEQ data (N = 2,213), and the rMEQ was compiled. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis for the psychometric properties of the rMEQ and confirmed its robust one-factor structure for evaluating morningness-eveningness (GFI = 0.984, AGFI = 0.951, CFI = 0.935, and RMSEA = 0.091). Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency of rMEQ items using Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω, and the values were 0.618 and 0.654, respectively. The rMEQ scores strongly correlated with MEQ (ρ = 0.883, p < 0.001), and classification agreement (Morning, Neither, and Evening types) between rMEQ and MEQ was 77.6% (Cramer's V = 0.643, Weighted Cohen's κ = 0.72), confirming the validity. The Japanese rMEQ may be a valuable tool for the efficient assessment of circadian typologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronobiology International
Chronobiology International 生物-生理学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
110
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chronobiology International is the journal of biological and medical rhythm research. It is a transdisciplinary journal focusing on biological rhythm phenomena of all life forms. The journal publishes groundbreaking articles plus authoritative review papers, short communications of work in progress, case studies, and letters to the editor, for example, on genetic and molecular mechanisms of insect, animal and human biological timekeeping, including melatonin and pineal gland rhythms. It also publishes applied topics, for example, shiftwork, chronotypes, and associated personality traits; chronobiology and chronotherapy of sleep, cardiovascular, pulmonary, psychiatric, and other medical conditions. Articles in the journal pertain to basic and applied chronobiology, and to methods, statistics, and instrumentation for biological rhythm study. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/page/cbi/Description
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信