急诊手术术前延误:第二急诊手术室的现实情况、经济影响和收益。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Á Lucey, S Beecher, R McLaughlin
{"title":"急诊手术术前延误:第二急诊手术室的现实情况、经济影响和收益。","authors":"Á Lucey, S Beecher, R McLaughlin","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Time-to-theatre (TTT) is a key performance indicator of theatre efficiency and delayed TTT incurs significant costs and poor clinical outcomes. An increasing Irish population in conjunction with an ageing population puts increasing pressure on emergency surgical services across Ireland. We examined our institution's experience with introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective theatre lists for acute surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of electronic, prospectively maintained databases was performed between 1 February 2018 and 31 January 2020. A cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of delayed TTT. The cost-saving benefit of introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective Kaizen lists was then calculated and compared with 2012-2014 figures from our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6,679 procedures were performed. Overall mean TTT was 16h, 10h shorter than before the introduction of a second emergency theatre and Kaizen theatre lists (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients aged >65 years, who are historically a significantly disadvantaged group, had a shorter TTT following the introduction of a second emergency theatre. The economic advantage of a second emergency theatre resulted in a cost saving of <b>€</b>3,674,538 over 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investment in emergency surgical services resulted in more efficient access to emergency theatres. There was a reduction in out-of-hours operating across all specialties and across the more at-risk groups such as those over the age of 65, who had an overall reduction in TTT. This had significant financial benefits and likely reduced the clinical risk associated with delayed TTT and out-of-hours operating.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"534-539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency surgery preoperative delays: realities, economic impacts and gains of a second emergency operating theatre.\",\"authors\":\"Á Lucey, S Beecher, R McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Time-to-theatre (TTT) is a key performance indicator of theatre efficiency and delayed TTT incurs significant costs and poor clinical outcomes. An increasing Irish population in conjunction with an ageing population puts increasing pressure on emergency surgical services across Ireland. We examined our institution's experience with introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective theatre lists for acute surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of electronic, prospectively maintained databases was performed between 1 February 2018 and 31 January 2020. A cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of delayed TTT. The cost-saving benefit of introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective Kaizen lists was then calculated and compared with 2012-2014 figures from our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6,679 procedures were performed. Overall mean TTT was 16h, 10h shorter than before the introduction of a second emergency theatre and Kaizen theatre lists (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients aged >65 years, who are historically a significantly disadvantaged group, had a shorter TTT following the introduction of a second emergency theatre. The economic advantage of a second emergency theatre resulted in a cost saving of <b>€</b>3,674,538 over 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investment in emergency surgical services resulted in more efficient access to emergency theatres. There was a reduction in out-of-hours operating across all specialties and across the more at-risk groups such as those over the age of 65, who had an overall reduction in TTT. This had significant financial benefits and likely reduced the clinical risk associated with delayed TTT and out-of-hours operating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"534-539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介手术室所需时间(TTT)是衡量手术室效率的关键绩效指标,延迟的 TTT 会导致高昂的成本和不良的临床结果。爱尔兰人口的不断增长以及人口老龄化的加剧,给整个爱尔兰的急诊外科服务带来了越来越大的压力。我们研究了本机构在为急诊手术患者引入第二急诊手术室和半选择性手术室名单方面的经验:在 2018 年 2 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 31 日期间,我们对前瞻性维护的电子数据库进行了回顾性审查。进行了成本分析,以评估延迟 TTT 的经济影响。然后计算了引入第二个急诊室和半选择性Kaizen清单的成本节约效益,并与本院2012-2014年的数据进行了比较:共进行了 6679 例手术。总平均手术时间为16小时,比引入第二急诊室和Kaizen手术室名单前缩短了10小时(p < 0.001)。年龄大于 65 岁的患者历来是明显的弱势群体,在引入第二急诊室后,他们的总手术时间也缩短了。第二急诊室的经济优势在24个月内节省了3,674,538欧元的成本:结论:对急诊外科服务的投资提高了急诊室的使用效率。所有专科和高危人群(如 65 岁以上人群)的非工作时间手术都有所减少,他们的总手术时间也有所减少。这不仅带来了巨大的经济效益,还可能降低了与 TTT 延误和非工作时间手术相关的临床风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency surgery preoperative delays: realities, economic impacts and gains of a second emergency operating theatre.

Introduction: Time-to-theatre (TTT) is a key performance indicator of theatre efficiency and delayed TTT incurs significant costs and poor clinical outcomes. An increasing Irish population in conjunction with an ageing population puts increasing pressure on emergency surgical services across Ireland. We examined our institution's experience with introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective theatre lists for acute surgical patients.

Methods: A retrospective review of electronic, prospectively maintained databases was performed between 1 February 2018 and 31 January 2020. A cost analysis was conducted to assess the economic impact of delayed TTT. The cost-saving benefit of introducing a second emergency theatre and semi-elective Kaizen lists was then calculated and compared with 2012-2014 figures from our institution.

Results: In total, 6,679 procedures were performed. Overall mean TTT was 16h, 10h shorter than before the introduction of a second emergency theatre and Kaizen theatre lists (p < 0.001). Patients aged >65 years, who are historically a significantly disadvantaged group, had a shorter TTT following the introduction of a second emergency theatre. The economic advantage of a second emergency theatre resulted in a cost saving of 3,674,538 over 24 months.

Conclusion: Investment in emergency surgical services resulted in more efficient access to emergency theatres. There was a reduction in out-of-hours operating across all specialties and across the more at-risk groups such as those over the age of 65, who had an overall reduction in TTT. This had significant financial benefits and likely reduced the clinical risk associated with delayed TTT and out-of-hours operating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信