{"title":"[根据 \"含有有害物质的家用产品管理法 \"修订官方方法的磷酸三(2,3-二溴丙基)酯和磷酸二(2,3-二溴丙基)酯分析方法的审查]。","authors":"Tsuyoshi Kawakami, Tomoko Ooshima, Masayuki Ohyama, Naeko Sugaya, Iwaki Nishi, Taichi Yoshitomi, Hisayoshi Takai, Takanari Wakayama, Hiroyuki Ohno, Maiko Tahara, Yoshiaki Ikarashi","doi":"10.1248/yakushi.23-00188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, the use of frame retardants [tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate: TDBPP and bis(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate: BDBPP] in several household textile products is banned under the \"Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances.\" As the official analytical methods for testing these substances have not been revised for over 42 years, several issues such as the using of harmful reagents, have been pointed out. Therefore, we developed a new method to revise the official method in our previous study. In this study, the validity of the developed test method is evaluated at six laboratories using two types of textile samples spiked with TDBPP and BDBPP at three concentrations (4, 8, and 20 µg/g). TDBPP and BDBPP are extracted under reflux using methanol containing hydrochloric acid. TDBPP is analyzed using GC-MS, and BDBPP is also analyzed using GC-MS after methylation with trimethylsilyl diazomethane. Although the accuracy (70-120%), repeatability (<10%), and reproducibility (<15%) of a few samples, mainly low concentration samples, are out of range, overall, the concentration level of detection limits of TDBPP and BDBPP (8 and 10 µg/g) in official analytical methods are quantifiable with sufficient precision using the proposed method. Furthermore, harmful reagents are not used in this method. Thus, the method validated in this study is effective as a revised method for the testing of TDBPP and BDBPP in household textile products.</p>","PeriodicalId":23810,"journal":{"name":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","volume":"144 4","pages":"463-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Examination of Analytical Method for Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate and Bis(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate to Revise the Official Methods Based on \\\"Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances\\\"].\",\"authors\":\"Tsuyoshi Kawakami, Tomoko Ooshima, Masayuki Ohyama, Naeko Sugaya, Iwaki Nishi, Taichi Yoshitomi, Hisayoshi Takai, Takanari Wakayama, Hiroyuki Ohno, Maiko Tahara, Yoshiaki Ikarashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1248/yakushi.23-00188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Japan, the use of frame retardants [tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate: TDBPP and bis(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate: BDBPP] in several household textile products is banned under the \\\"Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances.\\\" As the official analytical methods for testing these substances have not been revised for over 42 years, several issues such as the using of harmful reagents, have been pointed out. Therefore, we developed a new method to revise the official method in our previous study. In this study, the validity of the developed test method is evaluated at six laboratories using two types of textile samples spiked with TDBPP and BDBPP at three concentrations (4, 8, and 20 µg/g). TDBPP and BDBPP are extracted under reflux using methanol containing hydrochloric acid. TDBPP is analyzed using GC-MS, and BDBPP is also analyzed using GC-MS after methylation with trimethylsilyl diazomethane. Although the accuracy (70-120%), repeatability (<10%), and reproducibility (<15%) of a few samples, mainly low concentration samples, are out of range, overall, the concentration level of detection limits of TDBPP and BDBPP (8 and 10 µg/g) in official analytical methods are quantifiable with sufficient precision using the proposed method. Furthermore, harmful reagents are not used in this method. Thus, the method validated in this study is effective as a revised method for the testing of TDBPP and BDBPP in household textile products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan\",\"volume\":\"144 4\",\"pages\":\"463-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.23-00188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.23-00188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Examination of Analytical Method for Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate and Bis(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate to Revise the Official Methods Based on "Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances"].
In Japan, the use of frame retardants [tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate: TDBPP and bis(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate: BDBPP] in several household textile products is banned under the "Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances." As the official analytical methods for testing these substances have not been revised for over 42 years, several issues such as the using of harmful reagents, have been pointed out. Therefore, we developed a new method to revise the official method in our previous study. In this study, the validity of the developed test method is evaluated at six laboratories using two types of textile samples spiked with TDBPP and BDBPP at three concentrations (4, 8, and 20 µg/g). TDBPP and BDBPP are extracted under reflux using methanol containing hydrochloric acid. TDBPP is analyzed using GC-MS, and BDBPP is also analyzed using GC-MS after methylation with trimethylsilyl diazomethane. Although the accuracy (70-120%), repeatability (<10%), and reproducibility (<15%) of a few samples, mainly low concentration samples, are out of range, overall, the concentration level of detection limits of TDBPP and BDBPP (8 and 10 µg/g) in official analytical methods are quantifiable with sufficient precision using the proposed method. Furthermore, harmful reagents are not used in this method. Thus, the method validated in this study is effective as a revised method for the testing of TDBPP and BDBPP in household textile products.