Jingfeng Yin, Ying Wu, Robert C. Liden, Donald Kluemper, Steve Sauerwald, Jibao Gu
{"title":"虐待型首席执行官与慈善型企业社会责任对组织创新和绩效的交互影响","authors":"Jingfeng Yin, Ying Wu, Robert C. Liden, Donald Kluemper, Steve Sauerwald, Jibao Gu","doi":"10.5465/amj.2022.0380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how and when chief executive officer (CEO) abusive leadership can undermine organizational innovation and performance by diminishing top management team (TMT) behavioral integration. Based on upper echelons theory and the related interface perspective, we analyzed cross-sectional survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 308 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Study 1 and multi-wave multisource survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 287 SMEs in Study 2. The empirical results support our theory. In addition, these effects are moderated by philanthropic corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiated by CEOs, such that CEO abusive leadership has a more substantial negative indirect impact on organizational innovation and performance when the level of philanthropic CSR is elevated. This moderation is attributed to TMT members’ amplified negative perceptions of receiving inconsistent treatment, whereby the CEO treats external stakeholders favorably and internal executives poorly. The combined effects of CEO abusive leadership and philanthropic CSR on organizational innovation and performance add to the literature on abusive leadership, strategic leadership interfaces, and upper echelons theory.","PeriodicalId":6975,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Journal","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Interactive Effects of Abusive CEOs and Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Innovation and Performance\",\"authors\":\"Jingfeng Yin, Ying Wu, Robert C. Liden, Donald Kluemper, Steve Sauerwald, Jibao Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amj.2022.0380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine how and when chief executive officer (CEO) abusive leadership can undermine organizational innovation and performance by diminishing top management team (TMT) behavioral integration. Based on upper echelons theory and the related interface perspective, we analyzed cross-sectional survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 308 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Study 1 and multi-wave multisource survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 287 SMEs in Study 2. The empirical results support our theory. In addition, these effects are moderated by philanthropic corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiated by CEOs, such that CEO abusive leadership has a more substantial negative indirect impact on organizational innovation and performance when the level of philanthropic CSR is elevated. This moderation is attributed to TMT members’ amplified negative perceptions of receiving inconsistent treatment, whereby the CEO treats external stakeholders favorably and internal executives poorly. The combined effects of CEO abusive leadership and philanthropic CSR on organizational innovation and performance add to the literature on abusive leadership, strategic leadership interfaces, and upper echelons theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0380\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Interactive Effects of Abusive CEOs and Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Innovation and Performance
We examine how and when chief executive officer (CEO) abusive leadership can undermine organizational innovation and performance by diminishing top management team (TMT) behavioral integration. Based on upper echelons theory and the related interface perspective, we analyzed cross-sectional survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 308 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Study 1 and multi-wave multisource survey data from CEOs and TMTs of 287 SMEs in Study 2. The empirical results support our theory. In addition, these effects are moderated by philanthropic corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiated by CEOs, such that CEO abusive leadership has a more substantial negative indirect impact on organizational innovation and performance when the level of philanthropic CSR is elevated. This moderation is attributed to TMT members’ amplified negative perceptions of receiving inconsistent treatment, whereby the CEO treats external stakeholders favorably and internal executives poorly. The combined effects of CEO abusive leadership and philanthropic CSR on organizational innovation and performance add to the literature on abusive leadership, strategic leadership interfaces, and upper echelons theory.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) is to disseminate empirical research that rigorously tests, extends, or constructs management theory while enhancing management practice. The journal welcomes diverse empirical methods, including qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, meta-analytic, and mixed methods. For publication in AMJ, research must exhibit robust empirical and theoretical contributions, with manuscripts emphasizing the practical relevance of these contributions to management practice. Authors are encouraged to craft original, insightful, interesting, and theoretically bold research that makes a substantial "value-added" contribution to the field's comprehension of a given issue or topic.