凝视显示反馈对医学生自我监控和放射学学习的影响。

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ellen M. Kok, Diederick C. Niehorster, Anouk van der Gijp, Dirk R. Rutgers, William F. Auffermann, Marieke van der Schaaf, Liesbeth Kester, Tamara van Gog
{"title":"凝视显示反馈对医学生自我监控和放射学学习的影响。","authors":"Ellen M. Kok,&nbsp;Diederick C. Niehorster,&nbsp;Anouk van der Gijp,&nbsp;Dirk R. Rutgers,&nbsp;William F. Auffermann,&nbsp;Marieke van der Schaaf,&nbsp;Liesbeth Kester,&nbsp;Tamara van Gog","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Self-monitoring is essential for effectively regulating learning, but difficult in visual diagnostic tasks such as radiograph interpretation. Eye-tracking technology can visualize viewing behavior in gaze displays, thereby providing information about visual search and decision-making. We hypothesized that individually adaptive gaze-display feedback improves posttest performance and self-monitoring of medical students who learn to detect nodules in radiographs. We investigated the effects of: (1) Search displays, showing which part of the image was searched by the participant; and (2) Decision displays, showing which parts of the image received prolonged attention in 78 medical students. After a pretest and instruction, participants practiced identifying nodules in 16 cases under search-display, decision-display, or no feedback conditions (<i>n</i> = 26 per condition). A 10-case posttest, without feedback, was administered to assess learning outcomes. After each case, participants provided self-monitoring and confidence judgments. Afterward, participants reported on self-efficacy, perceived competence, feedback use, and perceived usefulness of the feedback. Bayesian analyses showed no benefits of gaze displays for post-test performance, monitoring accuracy (absolute difference between participants’ estimated and their actual test performance), completeness of viewing behavior, self-efficacy, and perceived competence. Participants receiving search-displays reported greater feedback utilization than participants receiving decision-displays, and also found the feedback more useful when the gaze data displayed was precise and accurate. As the completeness of search was not related to posttest performance, search displays might not have been sufficiently informative to improve self-monitoring. Information from decision displays was rarely used to inform self-monitoring. Further research should address if and when gaze displays can support learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 5","pages":"1689 - 1710"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students’ self-monitoring and learning in radiology\",\"authors\":\"Ellen M. Kok,&nbsp;Diederick C. Niehorster,&nbsp;Anouk van der Gijp,&nbsp;Dirk R. Rutgers,&nbsp;William F. Auffermann,&nbsp;Marieke van der Schaaf,&nbsp;Liesbeth Kester,&nbsp;Tamara van Gog\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Self-monitoring is essential for effectively regulating learning, but difficult in visual diagnostic tasks such as radiograph interpretation. Eye-tracking technology can visualize viewing behavior in gaze displays, thereby providing information about visual search and decision-making. We hypothesized that individually adaptive gaze-display feedback improves posttest performance and self-monitoring of medical students who learn to detect nodules in radiographs. We investigated the effects of: (1) Search displays, showing which part of the image was searched by the participant; and (2) Decision displays, showing which parts of the image received prolonged attention in 78 medical students. After a pretest and instruction, participants practiced identifying nodules in 16 cases under search-display, decision-display, or no feedback conditions (<i>n</i> = 26 per condition). A 10-case posttest, without feedback, was administered to assess learning outcomes. After each case, participants provided self-monitoring and confidence judgments. Afterward, participants reported on self-efficacy, perceived competence, feedback use, and perceived usefulness of the feedback. Bayesian analyses showed no benefits of gaze displays for post-test performance, monitoring accuracy (absolute difference between participants’ estimated and their actual test performance), completeness of viewing behavior, self-efficacy, and perceived competence. Participants receiving search-displays reported greater feedback utilization than participants receiving decision-displays, and also found the feedback more useful when the gaze data displayed was precise and accurate. As the completeness of search was not related to posttest performance, search displays might not have been sufficiently informative to improve self-monitoring. Information from decision displays was rarely used to inform self-monitoring. Further research should address if and when gaze displays can support learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1689 - 1710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-024-10322-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我监控对于有效调节学习至关重要,但在视觉诊断任务中却很难做到,如射线照片判读。眼动跟踪技术可以通过注视显示将观看行为可视化,从而提供有关视觉搜索和决策的信息。我们假设,个体自适应凝视显示反馈能提高医学生在学习检测射线照片结节时的后测成绩和自我监控能力。我们研究了以下方面的效果(1) 搜索显示,显示参与者搜索图像的哪个部分;(2) 决策显示,显示图像的哪个部分受到 78 名医学生的长时间关注。经过前测和指导后,参与者在搜索显示、决策显示或无反馈条件下练习识别 16 个病例中的结节(每个条件的人数 = 26 人)。为评估学习成果,进行了 10 个病例的无反馈后测。每个案例结束后,参与者都要进行自我监测和信心判断。之后,参与者报告了自我效能感、感知能力、反馈使用情况以及感知反馈的有用性。贝叶斯分析表明,凝视显示对测试后成绩、监测准确性(参与者估计成绩与实际测试成绩之间的绝对差异)、观看行为的完整性、自我效能感和感知能力均无益处。与接受决策显示屏的学员相比,接受搜索显示屏的学员对反馈的利用率更高,而且他们还认为,当显示的注视数据精确无误时,反馈更有用。由于搜索的完整性与测试后的成绩无关,因此搜索显示的信息可能不足以提高自我监控能力。来自决策显示的信息很少被用于自我监控。进一步的研究应该探讨凝视显示是否以及何时能够支持学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of gaze-display feedback on medical students’ self-monitoring and learning in radiology

Self-monitoring is essential for effectively regulating learning, but difficult in visual diagnostic tasks such as radiograph interpretation. Eye-tracking technology can visualize viewing behavior in gaze displays, thereby providing information about visual search and decision-making. We hypothesized that individually adaptive gaze-display feedback improves posttest performance and self-monitoring of medical students who learn to detect nodules in radiographs. We investigated the effects of: (1) Search displays, showing which part of the image was searched by the participant; and (2) Decision displays, showing which parts of the image received prolonged attention in 78 medical students. After a pretest and instruction, participants practiced identifying nodules in 16 cases under search-display, decision-display, or no feedback conditions (n = 26 per condition). A 10-case posttest, without feedback, was administered to assess learning outcomes. After each case, participants provided self-monitoring and confidence judgments. Afterward, participants reported on self-efficacy, perceived competence, feedback use, and perceived usefulness of the feedback. Bayesian analyses showed no benefits of gaze displays for post-test performance, monitoring accuracy (absolute difference between participants’ estimated and their actual test performance), completeness of viewing behavior, self-efficacy, and perceived competence. Participants receiving search-displays reported greater feedback utilization than participants receiving decision-displays, and also found the feedback more useful when the gaze data displayed was precise and accurate. As the completeness of search was not related to posttest performance, search displays might not have been sufficiently informative to improve self-monitoring. Information from decision displays was rarely used to inform self-monitoring. Further research should address if and when gaze displays can support learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信